Cited by 55Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Macrocirculation is not the sole determinant of respiratory induced variations in the reflection mode photoplethysmographic signal

Open access
Nilsson, L, Johansson, A, Kalman, S·2003·Physiological Measurement

Abstract

Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a non-invasive optical technique sensitive to variations in blood volume and perfusion in the tissue. Reflection mode PPG may have clinical advantages over transmission mode PPG. To improve clinical usefulness and further development of the reflection mode PPG, studies on factors that modify the signal are warranted. We studied the coherence between the respiratory induced intensity variations (RIIV) of the PPG signal and respiratory synchronous pressure variations in central venous pressure (CVP), peripheral venous pressure (PVP) and arterial blood pressure (ABP) during positive pressure ventilation on 12 patients under anaesthesia and on 12 patients with spontaneous breathing. During positive pressure ventilation the coherence between all signals was high. Inspiration was followed first by an increase in CVP, then by increases in ABP and PVP and lastly by RIIV indicating less back-scattered light. In spontaneously breathing patients the coherence was high, but the phases between the signals were changed. During inspiration, ABP decreased slightly before CVP, followed by a decrease in RIIV and PVP. The phase relation between RIIV and respiratory induced variation in macrocirculation changed with ventilatory mode, but not in a uniform way, indicating the influence of mechanisms other than macrocirculation involved in generating the RIIV signal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0967-3334/24/4/009

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Venous pressure can add low-frequency noise to the PPG waveform, often between 0 and 0.5 Hz, contributing to baseline oscillations.

    “Venous pressure can also add low-frequency noise to the PPG waveform, the same effects seen by respiration, which is caused by venous anatomy [129,130,131]. Often between 0 and 0.5 Hz, this noise contributes to be baseline oscillations.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nilsson, L., Johansson, A., & Kalman, S.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University Hospital (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Venue
Physiological Measurement
Published
2003-10-31
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
925-937
ISSN
  • 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6579
OpenAlex
W2139142627
Cited by
55
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiological Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
macrocirculation, central venous pressure, peripheral venous pressure, arterial blood pressure, positive pressure ventilation, spontaneous breathing, coherence analysis, phase equilibria, anesthesia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Apnea, Blood Pressure, Blood Volume, Central Venous Pressure, Child, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Male, Microcirculation, Middle Aged, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Respiratory Mechanics, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review