The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-accuracy automatic classification of Parkinsonian tremor severity using machine learning method
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Although clinical aspirations for new technology to accurately measure and diagnose Parkinsonian tremors exist, automatic scoring of tremor severity using machine learning approaches has not yet been employed. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to maximize the scientific validity of automatic tremor-severity classification using machine learning algorithms to score Parkinsonian tremor severity in the same manner as the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) used to rate scores in real clinical practice. APPROACH: Eighty-five PD patients perform four tasks for severity assessment of their resting, resting with mental stress, postural, and intention tremors. The tremor signals are measured using a wristwatch-type wearable device with an accelerometer and gyroscope. Displacement and angle signals are obtained by integrating the acceleration and angular-velocity signals. Nineteen features are extracted from each of the four tremor signals. The optimal feature configuration is decided using the wrapper feature selection algorithm or principal component analysis, and decision tree, support vector machine, discriminant analysis, and k-nearest neighbour algorithms are considered to develop an automatic scoring system for UPDRS prediction. The results are compared to UPDRS ratings assigned by two neurologists. MAIN RESULTS: The highest accuracies are 92.3%, 86.2%, 92.1%, and 89.2% for resting, resting with mental stress, postural, and intention tremors, respectively. The weighted Cohen's kappa values are 0.745, 0.635 and 0.633 for resting, resting with mental stress, and postural tremors (almost perfect agreement), and 0.570 for intention tremors (moderate). SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate the feasibility of the proposed system as a clinical decision tool for Parkinsonian tremor-severity automatic scoring.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous work on tremor detection and quantification is mainly based on short segments of signal and heavily relied on manual signal segmentation [37].”
From Detection and Quantification of Resting Tremor in Parkinson's Disease Using Long-Term Acceleration Data (2021) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments
Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 · Cited by 10,117
Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured?
Bruton, A., Conway, J. H., & Holgate, S. T. (2000) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0031-9406(05)61211-4 · Cited by 763 · cited 1×
“…represented these outstanding results with RMSE, acc uracy, and weighted Kappa coefficient based on the fact that several suitable methods for reliability assessment should be represented together considering advantages and disadvantages of each method of reliability assessment (Bruton et al 2000).”
MethodSalarian, A., Russmann, H., Wider, C., Burkhard, P. R., Vingerhoets, F. J. G., & Aminian, K. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2006.886670 · Cited by 416 · cited 2×
“Further, high and significant correlations between the UPDRS and tremor signals have been reported based on feature analysis using accelerometers, gyroscopes, or smartphones; hence, the tremors of PD patients have been quantified (Salarian et al 2007, Daneault et al 2012).”
BackgroundDynamics of tremor-related oscillations in the human globus pallidus: a single case study
Hurtado, J. M., Gray, C. M., Tamas, L. B., & Sigvardt, K. A. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1674 · Cited by 246
Kubota, K. J., Chen, J. A., & Little, M. A. (2016) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.26693 · Cited by 210 · cited 1×
“However, machine learning algorithms must be used to convert the high-dimensional characteristics of motion-sensor data into scientifically and clinically meaningful information (Kubota et al 2016).”
MethodSmart watch accelerometry for analysis and diagnosis of tremor
Wile, D. J., Ranawaya, R., & Kiss, Z. H. T. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.021 · Cited by 148
Heida, T., Wentink, E., & Marani, E. (2013) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-10-70 · Cited by 66
Linear and nonlinear tremor acceleration characteristics in patients with Parkinson's disease
Meigal, A. Y., Rissanen, S. M., Tarvainen, M. P., Georgiadis, S. D., Karjalainen, P. A., Airaksinen, O., & Kankaanpää, M. (2012) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/33/3/395 · Cited by 63
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Crawford, 2011, Differentiation and diagnosis of tremor, Am. Fam. Phys., 83, 697
- Dai, 2015, Quantitative assessment of Parkinsonian tremor based on an inertial measurement unit, Sensors, 15, 25055, 10.3390/s151025055 · DOI
- Daneault, 2012, Using a smart phone as a standalone platform for detection and monitoring of pathological tremors, Frontiers Hum. Neurosci., 6, 357, 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00357 · DOI · Paper page
- Davidson, 2012, Comparison of patient rated treatment response with measured improvement in Parkinson’s disease, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 83, 1001, 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302741 · DOI
- Giuberti, 2015a, Assigning UPDRS scores in the leg agility task of Parkinsonians: can it be done through BSN-based kinematic variables?, IEEE Int. Things J., 2, 41, 10.1109/JIOT.2015.2390075 · DOI
- Giuberti, 2015b, Automatic UPDRS evaluation in the sit-to-stand task of Parkinsonians: kinematic analysis and comparative outlook on the leg agility task, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., 19, 803, 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2425296 · DOI
- Giuffrida, 2009, Clinically deployable Kinesia technology for automated tremor assessment, Mov. Disord., 24, 723, 10.1002/mds.22445 · DOI
- Goetz, 1997, Efficacy of a patient-training videotape on motor fluctuations for on-off diaries in Parkinson’s disease, Mov. Disord., 12, 1039, 10.1002/mds.870120631 · DOI
- Goetz, 2008, Movement disorder society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results, Mov. Disord., 23, 2129, 10.1002/mds.22340 · DOI · Paper page
- Kohavi, 1997, Wrappers for feature subset selection, Artif. Intell., 97, 273, 10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X · DOI
- Kostikis, 2015, A smartphone-based tool for assessing Parkinsonian hand tremor, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., 19, 1835, 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2471093 · DOI · Paper page
- Kraus, 2006, Kinetic tremor in Parkinson’s disease—an underrated symptom, J. Neural Transm., 113, 845, 10.1007/s00702-005-0354-9 · DOI
- Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
- Maetzler, 2013, Quantitative wearable sensors for objective assessment of Parkinson’s disease, Mov. Disord., 28, 1628, 10.1002/mds.25628 · DOI · Paper page
- Martinez-Manzanera, 2016, A method for automatic and objective scoring of bradykinesia using orientation sensors and classification algorithms, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 63, 1016, 10.1109/TBME.2015.2480242 · DOI
- Meigal, 2009, Novel parameters of surface EMG in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy young and old controls, J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 19, e206, 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.02.008 · DOI
- Memedi, 2013, Automatic and objective assessment of alternating tapping performance in Parkinson’s disease, Sensors, 13, 16965, 10.3390/s131216965 · DOI
- Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson’s Disease, 2003, The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations, Mov. Disord., 18, 738, 10.1002/mds.10473 · DOI
- Pan, 2015, A mobile cloud-based Parkinson’s disease assessment system for home-based monitoring, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 3, e29, 10.2196/mhealth.3956 · DOI
- Parisi, 2015, Body-sensor-network-based kinematic characterization and comparative outlook of UPDRS scoring in leg agility, sit-to-stand, and gait tasks in Parkinson’s disease, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., 19, 1777, 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2472640 · DOI
- Parisi, 2016, Inertial BSN-based characterization and automatic UPDRS evaluation of the gait task of Parkinsonians, IEEE Trans. Affective Comput., 7, 258, 10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2549533 · DOI
- Puschmann, 2011, Diagnosis and treatment of common forms of tremor, Semin. Neurol., 31, 65, 10.1055/s-0031-1271312 · DOI · Paper page
- Rissanen, 2008, Surface EMG and acceleration signals in Parkinson’s disease: feature extraction and cluster analysis, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 46, 849, 10.1007/s11517-008-0369-0 · DOI
- Rissanen, 2007, Analysis of surface EMG signal morphology in Parkinson’s disease, Physiol. Meas., 28, 1507, 10.1088/0967-3334/28/12/005 · DOI
- Sama, 2017, Estimating bradykinesia severity in Parkinson’s disease by analysing gait through a waist-worn sensor, Comput. Biol. Med., 84, 114, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.03.020 · DOI
- Stamatakis, 2013, Finger tapping clinimetric score prediction in Parkinson’s disease using low-cost accelerometers, Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2013, 10.1155/2013/717853 · DOI · Paper page
- Sturman, 2005, Effects of aging on the regularity of physiological tremor, J. Neurophysiol., 93, 3064, 10.1152/jn.01218.2004 · DOI
- Thanawattano, 2015, Temporal fluctuations of tremor signals from inertial sensor: a preliminary study in differentiating Parkinson’s disease from essential tremor, Biomed. Eng. Online, 14, 1, 10.1186/1475-925X-14-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Determination Method for Gait Event Based on Acceleration Sensors
Mei, C., Gao, F., & Li, Y. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19245499 · Cited by 16
Yuan, H., Liu, S., Liu, J., Lin, H., Yang, C., Cai, X., Zeng, L., & Li, S. (2021) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2021/5669932 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeon, H., Lee, W., Park, H., Lee, H. J., Kim, S. K., Kim, H. B., Jeon, B., & Park, K. S.
- Affiliations
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Venue
- Physiological Measurement
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-10-31
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1980-1999
- ISSN
- 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6579
- OpenAlex
- W2758948784
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Physiological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coway Co., Ltd.
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- parkinsonian tremor, automatic scoring, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, wearable accelerometers, gyroscope, resting tremor, postural tremor, intention tremor, psychological stress, feature selection, clinical decision support
- MeSH terms
- Acceleration, Machine Learning, Wearable Electronic Devices, Aged, Automation, Female, Humans, Male, Parkinson Disease, Posture, Rest, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Tremor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review