The DOI matches its Crossref record; 159 of the 162 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 184 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Geometrodynamics of polarized light: Berry phase and spin Hall effect in a gradient-index medium
Open accessAbstract
We review the geometrical-optics evolution of an electromagnetic wave propagating along a curved ray trajectory in a gradient-index dielectric medium. A Coriolis-type term appears in Maxwell equations under transition to the rotating coordinate system accompanying the ray. This term describes the spin-orbit coupling of light which consists of (i) the Berry phase responsible for a trajectory-dependent polarization variations and (ii) the spin Hall effect representing polarization-dependent trajectory perturbations. These mutual phenomena are described within universal geometrical structures underlying the problem and are explained by the dynamics of the intrinsic angular momentum carried by the wave. Such close geometro-dynamical interrelations illuminate a dual physical nature of the phenomena.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review develops a unified geometrical-optics description of spin-orbit coupling of light in a gradient-index dielectric, where the Berry phase and spin Hall effect are mutual consequences of a Coriolis-type term in the ray-accompanying frame. It shows that polarization evolution and polarization-dependent ray deflection are governed by Berry connection/curvature and by conservation of total angular momentum.
Key findings
- The Berry phase and spin Hall effect of light are two sides of the same spin-orbit interaction: the Berry phase describes the trajectory’s effect on polarization, while the spin Hall effect describes polarization’s reaction on the ray trajectory; both follow from a single spin-orbit Lagrangian.
- The Berry curvature takes the form of a topological monopole in momentum space and equals \(F = t\) on the unit \(t\)-sphere, indicating unit Gaussian curvature; the Berry phase for a cyclic evolution equals the solid angle \(\Theta\) cut by the loop on the \(t\)-sphere, up to a \(2\pi\) frame-rotation difference.
- The spin Hall effect adds a helicity-dependent topological term to the ray equations, producing a transverse deflection orthogonal to both the wave momentum \(p\) and the inhomogeneity gradient \(\nabla n\); its magnitude is estimated as the wavelength \(\lambda\) for a complete \(2\pi\) turn of the propagation direction, and the splitting between right- and left-hand circularly polarized beams is \(\Delta = 2\delta r_0\).
- For a helical ray in a cylindrically symmetric medium, the Berry phase grows linearly with propagation distance and rotates the polarization ellipse uniformly; the spin Hall displacement is directed along the binormal and accumulates over repeated cyclical trajectories.
Methods
- Theoretical review using short-wavelength geometrical optics for a monochromatic electromagnetic wave in a smoothly inhomogeneous isotropic dielectric, with small parameter \(\mu\) comparing wavelength to medium inhomogeneity scale.
- Maxwell equations are projected onto the plane transverse to the ray, transformed to a ray-accompanying rotating coordinate frame, and diagonalized in the circular-polarization basis; the resulting Coriolis term is treated to first order in \(\mu\).
- The analysis uses Berry connection/curvature, Jones-vector and Stokes/Poincaré representations, Euler-Lagrange ray equations, and a worked example of a helical ray in a cylindrical gradient-index medium.
Limitations
- The paper states that it considers only the spin-redirection Rytov–Vladimirskii–Berry phase in inhomogeneous media and does not cover generalizations to step-index interfaces, anisotropic media, or higher-order states of light carrying orbital angular momentum.
- It notes that geometrical optics is rigorously inapplicable in single-mode waveguides, although the polarization evolution and Berry phase of waveguide modes obey the same geometrical formalism.
- It states that the spin Hall displacement is typically much smaller than the width of a paraxial optical beam, though observable because beam centroids can be measured with subwavelength accuracy; it also notes that the Imbert–Fedorov shift cannot generally be described within the Berry-phase formalism because of non-adiabatic evolution at sharp interfaces.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
62 Own interpretation · 54 No basis given · 42 Not checked yet · 3 Partly supported · 2 Own result · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“At the same time, Eq. (3.14) shows that it can be treated as the angular Doppler effect term, which describes the phase shift of the wave carrying intrinsic angular momentum Σ and undergoing rotational evolution with angular frequency Ω [68 -80].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] source
- Partly supportedcites [69] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (p. 2) reports a phase shift associated with spin rotation, and General Consideration (pp. 4–5) relates angular momentum to the rotation frequency. Our copy does not identify a spin-orbit Lagrangian as an angular Doppler effect term, so that specific interpretation is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites [70] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the paper’s discussion of the Coriolis frequency shift and unified geometric phase (page unavailable in our copy), a term in the wave Hamiltonian is linked to spin-orbit interaction, and the resulting phase arises as the reference frame rotates. The paper says this shift is similar to an angular Doppler shift, but explicitly distinguishes it from a real angular Doppler shift; it does not identify the term as a spin-orbit Lagrangian. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked yetcites [71] source
- Not checked yetcites [72] source
- Not checked yetcites [73] source
- Not checked yetcites [74] source
- Partly supportedcites [75] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the discussion of the rotating quarter-wave plate and Figs. 3–4 (page not provided), the paper reports a polarization-dependent geometric phase that changes with rotation rate Ω and produces a frequency shift. It does not identify a spin-orbit Lagrangian or an angular Doppler effect term involving intrinsic angular momentum Σ; the rotating element in its experiment is a wave plate. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked yetcites [76] source
- Not checked yetcites [77] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“By differentiating expression (3.36) and using Eq. (3.29) we find that the Stokes vector obeys the following precession equation [34,35]:”
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [34] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section D gives ray equations for circularly polarized light, and the passage following Eq. (28) says the Berry phase rotates the polarization plane. Neither passage states a precession equation for the Stokes vector; searches for “Stokes” and polarization precession found no such equation in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Partly supportedcites [35] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
On p. 2, the paper gives a cross-product evolution equation for the spin vector, which has a precession form. But it does not identify that vector as the Stokes vector or give a Stokes-vector precession equation; on p. 3, it says polarization was not considered in its framework. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For a cyclic evolution in momentum space (which corresponds to a ray trajectory with the coincident input and output directions of propagation), the Berry phase (3.26) equals [4 -20]”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [4] Vinitskii S I, 1990, Usp. Fiz. Nauk source
Section 3.3 relates the Berry phase of circularly polarized light to a closed path of propagation directions and its solid angle. It also says that, for adiabatic evolution, the spin-direction and propagation-direction spheres give equivalent descriptions. The cited paper therefore supports the claim in this optical setting. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [5] Vinitskii S I, 1990, Sov. Phys. Usp. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.1 describes a photon’s momentum returning to its initial value and the resulting geometrical phase. Section 3.6 gives the Berry phase as −mΩ(C), where m = ±1 is the photon’s helicity. The claim captures the solid-angle relationship but omits the helicity-dependent sign. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked yetcites [6] source
- Supportedcites [7] Ben-Aryeh Y, 2004, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. source
In the section labeled “Following” (page unavailable), the paper states that when a light wave’s propagation direction cycles along a closed path, its topological phase equals the solid angle of the circuit in the space of wavevector directions. This supports the claim for the optical momentum-space evolution described. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Not checked yetcites [8] source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Malykin G B, 2004, Phys.-Usp. source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Rytov S M, 1938, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR
- Not checked yetcites [11] Vladimirskii V V, 1941, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR
- Not checked yetcites [12] source
- Not checked yetcites [13] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The conservation of the total angular momentum, Eq. (3.42), links the spin Hall effect of light to another remarkable phenomenon - the transverse Imbert-Fedorov shift [24,27,99 -118].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Pancharatnam S, 1975, Collected Works
- Not checked yetcites [27] source
- Not checked yetcites [99] source
- Could not verifycites [100] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited paper’s Sections 2 and 4 discuss electromagnetic potentials and electron-beam interference and scattering. Searches for the spin Hall effect of light, the Imbert–Fedorov shift, and conservation of angular momentum found no passage linking those optical phenomena in our copy. Page numbers were not available for the retrieved passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked yetcites [101] source
- Not checked yetcites [102] source
- Could not verifycites [103] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s discussion of Stokes parameters and pseudospin (p. 2) and its applications to polarization changes (pp. 3–4) do not address the claimed link. Searches for the Imbert–Fedorov shift, the spin Hall effect of light, and conservation of total angular momentum found no passage establishing it. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Not checked yetcites [104] Fedorov F I, 1955, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR
- Not checked yetcites [105] source
- Not checked yetcites [106] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A Coriolis-type term appears in Maxwell equations under transition to the rotating coordinate system accompanying the ray.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inhomogeneity of the medium is smooth, i.e., its characteristic scale L is large compared with the wavelength.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Higher-order terms proportional to Ω^2 and Ω dot are neglected.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The spin-orbit Lagrangian (3.12) brings about an additional polarization-dependent wave phase.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The spin-orbit Lagrangian is proportional to the longitudinal component of the angular velocity of the co-moving coordinate frame, which is”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here the second term describes the Coriolis effect caused by the rotation of the ray coordinate frame.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Higher-order terms proportional to Ω^2 and Ω dot are neglected.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The angle of the resulting rotation of e equals the Berry phase B Φ .”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A cyclical evolution on the t sphere, Fig. 2, corresponds to the rotation on the angle 0 2 B Φ on the Poincaré sphere.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 44
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
- Probably not a substantial claim. 18
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to Eq. (3.10), in the first approximation of the geometrical optics, these two states evolve independently, and the zero-order polarization degeneracy is lifted by the Coriolis term.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This term is small: 0 ~ µ Ω Ż , but should be taken into account in the first-order approximation in µ .”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Its third component, [ ] 2 2 3 1,1 S e e + -= -∈ -, indicates the wave helicity and represents a continuous analogue of the quantized helicity 1 s = ± .”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is equal to the contour integral of the effective vector-potential A or to the flux of the 'magnetic field' F through this contour.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast to the previous Eqs. (3.25) -(3.29), equation (3.32) is independent of the local coordinate frame ( ) , , v w t and describes the polarization dynamics in a universal way.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Equation (3.32) is non-integrable , i.e., its solution ( ) l e is non-local due to the non-integrability of the Berry phase (3.25) and (3.26).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the surface of the unit t -sphere (i.e., at 1 p = ), the Berry curvature equals = F t indicating the unit Gaussian curvature of the surface.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, displacement δ r is directed locally orthogonal to inhomogeneity, 0 δ ≡ p , and we can use Eqs. (3.45) and (3.46) for calculation of δ r .”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the Stokes-vector formalism, Eq. (3.37), the Stokes vector precesses uniformly with angular velocity, Fig. 3:”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the Berry phase grows linearly with the propagation distance l , and polarization ellipse experience a uniform rotation with angular velocity (4.7) in the ray reference frame, see Fig. 1.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, the spin-dependent term of Eqs. (3.40) is proportional to the curvature of the ray and directed orthogonally to the local propagation plane (see Section A.2).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Equations (3.40) depend on the Berry curvature F and therefore are gauge-invariant, i.e., independent on the coordinate frame.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There had been a number of remarkable experiment [120 -123] which observed the spin-orbit coupling and polarization transport of light in complex speckle fields of multimode optical fibers (see also [24]),”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that 1 2 1 sin K ρ ϑ --= is the curvature of the helical ray, and Eq. (4.14) agrees with Eq. (A12).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Berry phase (the angle of rotation of the polarization ellipse) per one period of the helix, 2 / sin l π ρ ϑ = , equals”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Recently, the spin Hall effect of light and the ray equations (3.40) were verified by direct measurements for a helical trajectories as in Fig. 4 [35].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The spin-orbit term in Eqs. (3.40) is proportional to 0 Ż , and, thus, can be treated as a ' semiclassical ' correction to the ray equations.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The shift per one period of helix, 2 / sin l π ρ ϑ = , equals”
- Also stated in: § 4.4. Spin Hall effect · p. 16 · plain
“whereas the splitting between the centers of right-hand, 1 s = , and left-hand, 1 s = -, polarized beams is, evidently, 0 2 δ ∆ = r , see Fig. 4.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 4.4. Spin Hall effect · p. 16 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the torsion characterizes local rotation of this frame about t , and the Berry phase in this frame is”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here the Berry curvature is the monopole (3.20), whereas the Berry connection becomes Eq. (3.35) after gauge transformation (3.23) with α = -φ .”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, the topological term in equations (3.40) can be written as [35]”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the central wave phase 0 Φ ( 0 i e ψ Φ ∝ ) in this approximation is given by the WKB integral along the ray:”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the short-wavelength (semiclassical) approximation, the spin-orbit coupling can be described within the Berry-phase formalism, which has a universal geometrical character and can be applied to a diversity of quantum and classical wave systems [1 -3].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Shapere A, 1989, Geometric Phases in Physics
- Not checked yetcites [2] Markovski B, 1989, Topological Phases in Quantum Theory
- Not checked yetcites [3] Bohm A, 2003, Geometrical Phase in Quantum Systems source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The rays are curvilinear because of the wave refraction in the medium, and the gradient n ∇ plays the role of an 'external force' affecting the motion of the particle.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This effect is known as the spin Hall effect of light or optical Magnus effect [24 -35]”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Pancharatnam S, 1975, Collected Works
- Not checked yetcites [25] source
- Not checked yetcites [26] source
- Not checked yetcites [27] source
- Not checked yetcites [28] source
- Not checked yetcites [29] source
- Not checked yetcites [30] source
- Not checked yetcites [31] source
- Not checked yetcites [32] source
- Not checked yetcites [33] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This term describes the spin-orbit coupling of light which consists of (i) the Berry phase responsible for a trajectory-dependent polarization variations and (ii) the spin Hall effect representing polarizationdependent trajectory perturbations.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the zero -order approximation in µ , Eq. (3.1) results in the scalar Hamiltonian and the ray equations (2.3) -(2.6). However, polarization is indeterminate in this approximation.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It will be shown that the Berry phase and spin Hall effect are closely related to the dynamics of the spin angular momentum carried by the wave and can be described in terms of the Coriolis effect or the angular Doppler effect.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evolution of vector waves, e.g., electromagnetic or elastic ones, requires more sophisticated approaches, since it involves an additional, internal degree of freedom -polarization (spin).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These mutual phenomena are described within universal geometrical structures underlying the problem”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such close geometro-dynamical interrelations illuminate a dual physical nature of the phenomena.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This polarization term is small in a gradient-index medium (of the order of µ ) and can be treated perturbatively within the geometrical optics approach.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a more general context, the Berry phase and the accompanying geometric reaction forces arise from a coupling between the fast and slow degrees of freedom [44]”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The polarization rotation corresponding to the Berry phase (3.33) and (3.34) has been measured experimentally in single-mode optical fibers coiled in a helix similar to Fig. 1 [10,11] and for helical rays in a multimode rectilinear waveguide [20,35], cf. Section 4.”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This evidences adiabatic regime of the wave evolution [4,12,14,17], i.e., independence of the right- and left-hand circular polarizations.”
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“At the same time, it shows that the Berry phase is analogous to the Aharonov -Bohm (or Dirac) phase in quantum mechanics [94 -96].”
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, the spin Hall effect in a gradient-index medium and the Imbert-Fedorov shift represent, respectively, the weak- and strong-scattering limits of the polarization transport induced by the spin-orbit interaction of light.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, the spin Hall effect represents a real deflection of the ray trajectory, which is independent on the observation frame.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“but all of them (apart from numerical simulations in [123]) dealt with step-index index fibers, so that these results should rather be associated with the Imbert-Fedorov shifts upon the reflection at sharp inhomogeneities.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [123] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here J is obviously associated with the total angular momentum of light, consisting of the extrinsic orbital angular momentum = × L r p and the intrinsic spin angular momentum Σ .”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“It is worth remarking that the pseudospin S arrowrightnosp completely describes the polarization state of the wave, while the real spin angular momentum 0 s = Σ t Ż does not [97].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, propagation of light in optical fibers does not allow one to observe the geometricaloptics ray trajectories hidden in the complex speckle patterns of the interfering modes.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, akin to the Berry phase (3.26) and (3.33), the ray displacement takes the form of a nonlocal contour integral in momentum space, which can grow unlimitedly with the length of the trajectory.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Important to note that the Berry curvature appears in momentum rather than coordinate space and takes the form of the topological monopole as in the case of massless spinning particles.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the spin Hall effect, the Berry curvature manifests itself dynamically - the polarization term in Eq. (3.40) represents a ' Lorentz force ' from the 'magnetic monopole' (3.20).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The latter effect is a similar polarization-dependent displacement of a wave beam reflected or transmitted at a plane dielectric interface.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the zero-order (scalar) approximation the light propagates along a smooth trajectory which ensures the adiabatic regime of the evolution.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first-order corrections involve the wave polarization and bring about two mutual phenomena -the Berry phase and the spin Hall effect of light.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the Euler-angles and Frenet frames coincide with each other, the Berry-phase expressions are equivalent as well.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Berry phase can be associated with the inertia of the wave field which remains locally non-rotating, and can be eliminated in the proper inertial coordinate frame (see Section A3).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The Jones and Stokes representations characterize the polarization state of light, respectively, by the complex two-component vector ψ and the real three-component vector S arrowrightnosp . In the generic case, they obey ( ) SU 2 and ( ) SO 3 evolutions and correspond, respectively, to the Schrödinger and Heisenberg representations of spin in quantum mechanics [34,98].”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Berry phase represents the effect of the trajectory on the polarization of light, while the spin Hall effect is the inverse effect which accounts for the reaction of polarization on the trajectory of propagation.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It can be treated as an effective circular birefringence of the inhomogeneous medium [25,26], but, in fact, it arises because of the intrinsic property (spin) of light coupled to a curved ray trajectory.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, while the Berry phase is an artifact of a particular rotating ray-accompanying coordinate frame, the spinHall effect is a Coriolis-type transverse deflection induced by a real bending of spinning light.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the parallel-transport frame is non-local -equation (A14) contains the phase which depends on the integral evolution of t .”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case the intrinsic orbital angular momentum behaves, in the geometrical optics approximation, very much like spin and the vortex charge determines spin-like helicity of the beam.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, although the rotation of the ray-accompanying frame about t can be eliminated, rotation associated with the ray bending and the ray curvature is unremovable.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A number of effects related to the spin-orbit coupling of light take place in multimode optical fibers [24,120 -123,141 -144].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Pancharatnam S, 1975, Collected Works
- Not checked yetcites [120] source
- Not checked yetcites [121] source
- Not checked yetcites [122] source
- Not checked yetcites [123] source
- Not checked yetcites [141] Kravtsov Y A, 1996, Phys.-Usp. source
- Not checked yetcites [142] source
- Not checked yetcites [143] source
- Not checked yetcites [144] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These basis vectors characterize local properties of the curve and are independent on the laboratory coordinate frame.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Berry phase is the phase of the central plane wave in the packet.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the spin-orbit-type interaction occurs between the intrinsic and extrinsic orbital angular momentums of light beams, which induces the corresponding Berry phase and orbital Hall effect.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This shows that the spin-induced ray deflection is determined solely by the ray curvature and is directed along the binormal, i.e., orthogonal to the local propagation plane ( , ) t n .”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The inhomogeneity of the medium is smooth, i.e., its characteristic scale L is large compared with the wavelength.
“We assume that inhomogeneity of the medium is smooth, i.e., its characteristic scale, L , is large as compared with the wavelength:”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The dielectric constant of the medium is real.
“where 2 n ε = is the dielectric constant of the medium, which is assumed to be real.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Higher-order terms proportional to Ω^2 and Ω dot are neglected.
“Neglecting higher-order terms proportional to 2 Ω and Ω ɺ , we arrive at”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The wave beams or packets are Gaussian-type and do not bear an intrinsic orbital angular momentum.
“We imply Gaussian-type wave beams or packets which do not bear an intrinsic orbital angular momentum.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The position of the center of gravity of the beam can be measured with subwavelength accuracy.
“since the position of center of gravity of the beam can be measured with a subwavelength accuracy.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, the Berry connection and Berry curvature immediately appear in all intrinsic SOI phenomena, such as the spin-Hall effect.”
From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The intrinsic SOI of light originate from fundamental properties of the Maxwell equations 7,8 and are analogous to the spin-orbit interactions of relativistic quantum particles 2,9,10 and electrons in solids 11,12 .”
From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The last term in Eq. (1) describes the transverse spin-dependent displacement of the trajectory, i.e., the spin-Hall effect of light (Fig. 1a).”
From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Later, it was shown that the helicity-dependent term in Eq. (1) can be considered as a 'Lorentz force' produced by the Berry curvature F σ P ( ) acting in momentum space 7,13,14,17 (Box 2).”
From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
Goldstein, H. (1951) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno · Cited by 9,832
Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory
Aharonov, Y., & Bohm, D. (1959) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.115.485 · Cited by 6,996
The Classical Theory of Fields
(1975) · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-14608-1 · Cited by 4,725
Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field,
Dirac, P. A. M. (1931) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1931.0130 · Cited by 3,701
The Classical Theory of Fields
LANDAU, L. D., LIFSHITZ, E. M., & Holbrow, C. H. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050989 · Cited by 2,322
Universal Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect
Sinova, J., Culcer, D., Niu, Q., Sinitsyn, N. A., Jungwirth, T., & MacDonald, A. H. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.126603 · Cited by 2,180
Optical Spin-to-Orbital Angular Momentum Conversion in Inhomogeneous Anisotropic Media
Marrucci, L., Manzo, C., & Paparo, D. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.163905 · Cited by 2,115
Observation of the Spin Hall Effect of Light via Weak Measurements
Hosten, O., & Kwiat, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152697 · Cited by 2,026
Dissipationless Quantum Spin Current at Room Temperature
Murakami, S., Nagaosa, N., & Zhang, S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1087128 · Cited by 1,952
Wilczek, F. A., & Shapere, A. D. (1989) · Advanced series in mathematical physics · doi:10.1142/0613 · Cited by 1,616
Generalized theory of interference, and its applications: Part I. Coherent pencils
Pancharatnam, S. (1956) · Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Section A · doi:10.1007/bf03046050 · Cited by 1,616
Reflection-Free One-Way Edge Modes in a Gyromagnetic Photonic Crystal
Wang, Z., Chong, Y. D., Joannopoulos, J. D., & Soljačić, M. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.013905 · Cited by 1,444
Analogs of quantum-Hall-effect edge states in photonic crystals
Raghu, S., & Haldane, F. D. M. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.033834 · Cited by 1,290
Onoda, M., Murakami, S., & Nagaosa, N. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.083901 · Cited by 1,148
The Adiabatic Phase and Pancharatnam's Phase for Polarized Light
Berry, M. V. (1987) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500348714551321 · Cited by 1,068
Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: Gradient corrections and Berry-phase effects
Sundaram, G. M., & Niu, Q. (1999) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.14915 · Cited by 1,065
The Anomalous Hall Effect and Magnetic Monopoles in Momentum Space
Fang, Z., Nagaosa, N., Takahashi, K. S., Asamitsu, A., Mathieu, R., Ogasawara, T., Yamada, H., Kawasaki, M., Tokura, Y., & Terakura, K. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089408 · Cited by 1,043
Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnetic Semiconductors
Jungwirth, T., Niu, Q., & MacDonald, A. H. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.207208 · Cited by 944
Geometrical Optics of Inhomogeneous Media
Kravtsov, Y. A., & Orlov, Y. I. (1990) · Springer Series on Wave Phenomena · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84031-9 · Cited by 903
Observation of Berry's Topological Phase by Use of an Optical Fiber
Tomita, A., & Chiao, R. Y. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.937 · Cited by 810
Bomzon, Z., Biener, G., Kleiner, V., & Hasman, E. (2002) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.27.001141 · Cited by 806
Bliokh, K. Y., & Bliokh, Y. P. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.073903 · Cited by 753
Self-citationSpin-to-Orbital Angular Momentum Conversion in a Strongly Focused Optical Beam
Zhao, Y., Edgar, J. S., Jeffries, G. D. M., McGloin, D., & Chiu, D. T. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.073901 · Cited by 665
Geometrodynamics of spinning light
Bliokh, K. Y., Niv, A., Kleiner, V., & Hasman, E. (2008) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2008.229 · Cited by 615
Self-citationImbert, C. (1972) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.5.787 · Cited by 544
Manifestations of Berry's Topological Phase for the Photon
Chiao, R. Y., & Wu, Y.-S. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.933 · Cited by 482
(1989) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/bfb0032076 · Cited by 446
The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems
Bohm, A., Mostafazadeh, A., Koizumi, H., Niu, Q., & Zwanziger, J. (2003) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10333-3 · Cited by 426
Spin-orbit interaction of a photon in an inhomogeneous medium
Liberman, V. S., & Zel’dovich, B. Y. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.46.5199 · Cited by 424
Topological Nature of Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnets
Onoda, M., & Nagaosa, N. (2002) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsj.71.19 · Cited by 390
Semiclassical theories of the anomalous Hall effect
Sinitsyn, N. A. (2007) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/02/023201 · Cited by 368
Role of beam propagation in Goos–Hänchen and Imbert–Fedorov shifts
Aiello, A., & Woerdman, J. P. (2008) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.33.001437 · Cited by 368
Coriolis Effect in Optics: Unified Geometric Phase and Spin-Hall Effect
Bliokh, K. Y., Gorodetski, Y., Kleiner, V., & Hasman, E. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.030404 · Cited by 363
Self-citationRotational Frequency Shift of a Light Beam
Courtial, J., Robertson, D. A., Dholakia, K., Allen, L., & Padgett, M. J. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.4828 · Cited by 329
Path integrals and stationary-phase approximations
Klauder, J. R. (1979) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.19.2349 · Cited by 327
Neutron interferometry in a rotating frame of reference
Mashhoon, B. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.2639 · Cited by 323
Polarization of light and topological phases
Bhandari, R. (1997) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(96)00029-4 · Cited by 298
Courtial, J., Dholakia, K., Robertson, D. A., Allen, L., & Padgett, M. J. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.3217 · Cited by 294
Ross, J. N. (1984) · Optical and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/bf00619638 · Cited by 260
Observation of topological phase by use of a laser interferometer
Bhandari, R., & Samuel, J. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.60.1211 · Cited by 234
Interpreting the anholonomy of coiled light
Berry, M. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326277a0 · Cited by 230
Evolving Geometric Phase and Its Dynamical Manifestation as a Frequency Shift: An Optical Experiment
Simon, R., Kimble, H. J., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.19 · Cited by 228
Bliokh, K. Y., & Bliokh, Y. P. (2007) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.75.066609 · Cited by 224
Self-citationGeometrical Optics of Beams with Vortices: Berry Phase and Orbital Angular Momentum Hall Effect
Bliokh, K. Y. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.043901 · Cited by 216
Self-citationParaxial beams of spinning light:
Berry, M. V. (1998) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.317704 · Cited by 210
Short-wavelength diffraction theory : asymptotic methods
Babich, V. M., & Buldyrev, V. S. (1991) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 205
Berry curvature, orbital moment, and effective quantum theory of electrons in electromagnetic fields
Chang, M., & Niu, Q. (2008) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/19/193202 · Cited by 203
Topological spin transport of photons: the optical Magnus effect and Berry phase
Bliokh, K. Y., & Bliokh, Y. P. (2004) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2004.10.035 · Cited by 201
Self-citationGeometric phases in the asymptotic theory of coupled wave equations
Littlejohn, R. G., & Flynn, W. G. (1991) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.44.5239 · Cited by 198
Dooghin, A. V., Кундикова, Н. Д., Liberman, V. S., & Zel’dovich., B. Y. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.45.8204 · Cited by 186
Spin Hall Effect of Light in Spherical Geometry
Haefner, D., Sukhov, S., & Dogariu, A. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.123903 · Cited by 182
Angular momentum of a strongly focused Gaussian beam
Nieminen, T. A., Stilgoe, A. B., Heckenberg, N. R., & Rubinsztein-Dunlop, H. (2008) · Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4258/10/11/115005 · Cited by 181
Garetz, B. A. (1981) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.71.000609 · Cited by 175
Goos–Hänchen and Imbert–Fedorov shifts of polarized vortex beams
Bliokh, K. Y., Shadrivov, I. V., & Kivshar, Y. S. (2009) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.34.000389 · Cited by 158
Self-citationAnomalous Hall Effect –A New Perspective–
Nagaosa, N. (2006) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsj.75.042001 · Cited by 156
Dynamics of optical spin-orbit coupling in uniaxial crystals
Brasselet, E., Izdebskaya, Y., Shvedov, V., Desyatnikov, A. S., Krolikowski, W., & Kivshar, Y. S. (2009) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.34.001021 · Cited by 144
Spin Hall effect and Berry phase of spinning particles
Bérard, A., & Mohrbach, H. (2006) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2005.11.071 · Cited by 144
Transverse Force on a Quantized Vortex in a Superfluid
Thouless, D. J., Ao, P., & Niu, Q. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.3758 · Cited by 143
Garetz, B. A., & Arnold, S. (1979) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/0030-4018(79)90230-x · Cited by 137
A Semiclassical Approach to the Dirac Equation
Bolte, J., & Keppeler, S. (1999) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1006/aphy.1999.5912 · Cited by 135
Bliokh, K. Y., & Bliokh, Y. P. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.70.026605 · Cited by 129
Self-citationOrigin of the geometric forces accompanying Berry’s geometric potentials
Aharonov, Y., & Stern, A. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.3593 · Cited by 125
Spin Hall effect of photons in a static gravitational field
Gosselin, P., Bérard, A., & Mohrbach, H. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.084035 · Cited by 123
Azimuthal doppler shift in light beams with orbital angular momentum
Allen, L., Babiker, M., & Power, W. L. (1994) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/0030-4018(94)00484-6 · Cited by 122
Anholonomy of a moving space curve and applications to classical magnetic chains
Balakrishnan, R., Bishop, A. R., & Dandoloff, R. (1993) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.3108 · Cited by 122
Path dependence of the geometric rotation of polarization in optical fibers
Haldane, F. D. M. (1986) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.11.000730 · Cited by 122
Coherent wave-packet evolution in coupled bands
Culcer, D., Yao, Y., & Niu, Q. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.085110 · Cited by 121
Bialynicki-Birula, I., & Białynicka-Birula, Z. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2539 · Cited by 116
Paraxial Light Beams with Angular MomentumPreprint
Bekshaev, A. Y., Soskin, M. S., & Vasnetsov, M. V. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0801.2309 · Cited by 112
Berry’s phase, locally inertial frames, and classical analogues
Kugler, M., & Shtrikman, S. (1988) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.934 · Cited by 110
Fermat principle for spinning light
Duval, C., Horváth, Z., & Horváthy, P. A. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.021701 · Cited by 107
Longitudinal and transverse displacements of a bounded microwave beam at total internal reflection*
Cowan, J. J., & Anicin, B. A. (1977) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.67.001307 · Cited by 101
Topological phases in quantum mechanics and polarization optics
Vinitskiĭ, S. I., Derbov, V. L., Dubovik, V. M., Markovski, B. L., & Stepanovskiĭ, Y. P. (1990) · Soviet Physics Uspekhi · doi:10.1070/pu1990v033n06abeh002598 · Cited by 101
Appearance of gauge potentials in atomic collision physics
Zygelman, B. (1987) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(87)90189-7 · Cited by 101
Doppler effect induced by rotating lenses
Nienhuis, G. (1996) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/0030-4018(96)00295-7 · Cited by 100
Fedoseyev, V. G. (2001) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(01)01262-7 · Cited by 100
Goos-Hänchen and Imbert-Fedorov shifts of polarized vortex beams
Bliokh, K. Y., Shadrivov, I. V., & Kivshar, Y. S. (2009) · Cited by 99
Self-citationSchilling, H. (1965) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19654710304 · Cited by 96
Geometrical aspects in optical wave-packet dynamics
Onoda, M., Murakami, S., & Nagaosa, N. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.74.066610 · Cited by 95
Pillon, F., Gilles, H., & Girard, S. (2004) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.43.001863 · Cited by 92
Thomas precession, spin-orbit interaction, and Berry’s phase
Mathur, H. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.3325 · Cited by 87
Topological spin transport of a relativistic electron
Bliokh, K. Y. (2005) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/epl/i2005-10205-1 · Cited by 82
Self-citationGeneration and conversion of optical vortices in long-period helical core optical fibers
Alexeyev, C. N., & Yavorsky, M. A. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.043828 · Cited by 81
Spin gauge fields: From Berry phase to topological spin transport and Hall effects
Bliokh, K. Y., & Bliokh, Y. P. (2005) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.03.001 · Cited by 80
Self-citationNoncommutative geometry and non-Abelian Berry phase in the wave-packet dynamics of Bloch electrons
Shindou, R., & Imura, K.-I. (2005) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.05.019 · Cited by 75
Space-variant geometrical phases in focused cylindrical light beams
Bomzon, Z., & Gu, M. (2007) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.32.003017 · Cited by 74
Dasgupta, R., & Gupta, P. K. (2006) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2005.07.033 · Cited by 70
Classical geometric forces of reaction: an exactly solvable model
Berry, M., & Robbins, J. M. (1993) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1993.0126 · Cited by 68
Topological phases in quantum mechanics and polarization optics
Vinitskii, S. I., Derbov, V. L., Dubovik, V. M., Markovski, B. L., & Stepanovskii, Y. P. (1990) · Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk · doi:10.3367/ufnr.0160.199006a.0001 · Cited by 68
Non-Abelian evolution of electromagnetic waves in a weakly anisotropic inhomogeneous medium
Bliokh, K. Y., Frolov, D. Y., & Kravtsov, Y. A. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.053821 · Cited by 67
Self-citationGeometrical spinoptics and the optical Hall effect
Duval, C., Horvȧth, Z., & Horváthy, P. A. (2006) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2006.07.003 · Cited by 66
Manifestation of the rotational Doppler effect by use of an off-axis optical vortex beam
Basistiy, I. V., Slyusar, V. V., Soskin, M. S., Vasnetsov, M. V., & Bekshaev, A. Y. (2003) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.28.001185 · Cited by 66
Berry’s phase in the relativistic theory of spinning particles
Bialynicki-Birula, I., & Bialynicka-Birula, Z. (1987) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.35.2383 · Cited by 65
Maxwell-Schrödinger Equation for Polarized Light and Evolution of the Stokes Parameters
Kuratsuji, H., & Kakigi, S. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1888 · Cited by 65
Electrodynamics in a rotating frame of reference
Mashhoon, B. (1989) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(89)90338-1 · Cited by 64
Angular momentum balance and transverse shifts on reflection of light
Player, M. A. (1987) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/20/12/020 · Cited by 64
Fedoseyev, V. G. (1988) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/21/9/019 · Cited by 62
Semiclassical Limit of the Dirac Equation and Spin Precession
Spohn, H. (2000) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1006/aphy.2000.6039 · Cited by 62
Adiabatic motion of a neutral spinning particle in an inhomogeneous magnetic field
Littlejohn, R. G., & Weigert, S. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.48.924 · Cited by 61
Gosselin, P., Bérard, A., & Mohrbach, H. (2007) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2007-00212-6 · Cited by 61
Okuda, H., & Sasada, H. (2008) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.25.000881 · Cited by 57
Kravtsov, Y. A., Naida, O. N., & Fuki, A. A. (1996) · Physics-Uspekhi · doi:10.1070/pu1996v039n02abeh000131 · Cited by 57
Quantum Mechanics of a Particle Confined to a Twisted Ring
Takagi, S., & Tanzawa, T. (1992) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp.87.561 · Cited by 57
Polarization transport of transverse acoustic waves: Berry phase and spin Hall effect of phonons
Bliokh, K. Y., & Freilikher, V. D. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.174302 · Cited by 55
Self-citationPhoton Berry’s phase as a classical topological effect
Segert, J. (1987) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.36.10 · Cited by 53
Fedoseyev, V. G. (2008) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/50/505202 · Cited by 50
Spin and orbital Hall effects for diffracting optical beams in gradient-index media
Bliokh, K. Y., & Desyatnikov, A. S. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.011807 · Cited by 48
Self-citationEnergy exchanges between a rotating retardation plate and a laser beam
Bretenaker, F., & Le Floch, A. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.2316 · Cited by 47
Bekshaev, A. Y. (2009) · Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4258/11/9/094003 · Cited by 47
Murakami, S. (2005) · Advances in Solid State Physics · doi:10.1007/11423256_16 · Cited by 46
Berry's phase in optical interferometry: a simple derivation
Lipson, S. G. (1990) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.15.000154 · Cited by 46
Geometric phase of optical rotators
Galvez, E. J., & Holmes, C. D. (1999) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.16.001981 · Cited by 46
Semiclassical limit of the Dirac equation and spin precessionPreprint
Spohn, H. E. (1999) · Cited by 45
Quantum Mechanics of a Particle Confined to a Twisted Ring
Takagi, S., & Tanzawa, T. (1992) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp/87.3.561 · Cited by 44
Geometric Canonical Phase Factors and Path Integrals
Kuratsuji, H. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.1687 · Cited by 43
Bliokh, K. Y., & Freilikher, V. D. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.035108 · Cited by 42
Self-citationThree-dimensional beam reflection at dielectric interfaces
Nasalski, W. (2001) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(01)01420-1 · Cited by 41
Dynamical Meaning of Quantum Adiabatic Phase: The Case of a Noncanonical System
Kuratsuji, H., & Iida, S. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.1003 · Cited by 41
Berry and Pancharatnam topological phases of atomic and optical systems
Ben-Aryeh, Y. (2004) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/6/4/r01 · Cited by 40
Stokes-vector evolution in a weakly anisotropic inhomogeneous medium
Kravtsov, Y. A., Bieg, B., & Bliokh, K. Y. (2007) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.24.003388 · Cited by 40
Self-citationClassical differential geometry
Bobenko, A. I., & Suris, Y. B. (2008) · Graduate studies in mathematics · doi:10.1090/gsm/098/01 · Cited by 40
Topological Phases in the Quantum Theory.
Imbo, T. D. (1988) · Cited by 39
General study of displacements at total reflection
Hugonin, J. P., & Petit, R. (1977) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/0150-536x/8/2/001 · Cited by 38
Baida, F., LABEKE, D. V., & Vigoureux, J. M. (2000) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.17.000858 · Cited by 36
Berry's phase and Fermi-Walker parallel transport
Dandoloff, R. (1989) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(89)90599-9 · Cited by 34
General covariance and quantum theory
Mashhoon, B. (1986) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01889625 · Cited by 33
Gosselin, P., Bérard, A., & Mohrbach, H. (2006) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 33
Manifestation of Berry’s phase in image-bearing optical beams
Segev, M., Solomon, R., & Yariv, A. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.590 · Cited by 30
Basistiy, I. V., Bekshaev, A. Y., Vasnetsov, M. V., Slyusar, V. V., & Soskin, M. S. (2002) · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters · doi:10.1134/1.1533771 · Cited by 29
Dynamical Diffraction Theory for Wave Packet Propagation in Deformed Crystals
Sawada, K., Murakami, S., & Nagaosa, N. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.154802 · Cited by 29
Topological phase evolving from the orbital angular momentum of ‘coiled’ quantum vortices
Alexeyev, C. N., & Yavorsky, M. A. (2006) · Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4258/8/9/008 · Cited by 28
Geometric phases in singlemode fiber lightguides and fiber ring interferometers
Malykin, G. B., & Pozdnyakova, V. I. (2004) · Physics-Uspekhi · doi:10.1070/pu2004v047n03abeh001722 · Cited by 28
Atomic Micromotion and Geometric Forces in a Triaxial Magnetic Trap
Müller, J. H., Morsch, O., Ciampini, D., et al. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.4454 · Cited by 28
Wave mechanics and inertial guidance
Benn, I. M., & Tucker, R. W. (1989) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.39.1594 · Cited by 27
Variational formalism for spinning particles
Horváthy, P. A. (1979) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.523961 · Cited by 26
Spin-orbit interaction and evolution of optical eddies in perturbed weakly directing optical fibers
Alekseev, K. N., Volyar, A. V., & Fadeeva, T. A. (2002) · Optics and Spectroscopy · doi:10.1134/1.1517085 · Cited by 25
Optical vortices and topological phase in strongly anisotropic coiled few-mode optical fibers
Alexeyev, C. N., Lapin, B. P., & Yavorsky, M. A. (2007) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.24.002666 · Cited by 25
Influence of the helical shape of a fibre waveguide on the propagation of light
Kataevskaya, I. V., & Kundikova, N. D. (1995) · Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1070/qe1995v025n09abeh000504 · Cited by 24
Opat, G. I. (1991) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.16729 · Cited by 23
Direct calculation of the Berry phase for spins and helicities
Jordan, T. F. (1987) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.527486 · Cited by 23
Measurement of the Transverse Displacement at Total Reflection by Helicoidal Laser Eigenstates
Dutriaux, L., Floch, A. L., & Bretenaker, F. (1993) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/24/5/005 · Cited by 19
Computation of the transverse shift by reflexion of a limited light beam
Ricard, J.-P. (1974) · Nouvelle Revue d Optique · doi:10.1088/0335-7368/5/1/301 · Cited by 16
Intrafibre rotation of the plane of polarisation
Zel'dovich, B. Y., & Kundikova, N. D. (1995) · Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1070/qe1995v025n02abeh000317 · Cited by 15
Geometric phases in singlemode fiber lightguides and fiber ring interferometers
Malykin, G. B., & Pozdnyakova, V. I. (2004) · Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk · doi:10.3367/ufnr.0174.200403e.0303 · Cited by 13
Shifts of Coherent Light Beams on Reflection at Plane Interfaces between Isotropic Media
Turner, R. L. (1980) · Australian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1071/ph800319a · Cited by 12
The effect of spin–orbit coupling on the structure of the stopband in helical-core optical fibres
Alexeyev, C. N., Lapin, B. P., & Yavorsky, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4258/10/8/085006 · Cited by 12
The equation of motion for a spin vortex and geometric force
Kuratsuji, H., & Yabu, H. (1996) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/29/20/008 · Cited by 11
Coriolis force, geometric phase, and spin-electric coupling in semiconductors
Serebrennikov, Y. A. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.195317 · Cited by 9
Segre, S. E. (2000) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.17.001682 · Cited by 8
Pillon, F., Gilles, H., Girard, S., Laroche, M., & Emile, O. (2005) · Applied Physics B · doi:10.1007/s00340-005-1728-2 · Cited by 8
Noncollinear rotational Doppler effect
Bekshaev, A. Y., & Popov, A. Y. (2004) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.558759 · Cited by 7
Large N field theories, quenching and the master field
Rossi, G. C., & Testa, M. (1983) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)91330-8 · Cited by 7
The classical differential geometry of curves and surfaces
Valiron, G. (1986) · Math Sci Press eBooks · Cited by 6
Optical Magnus effect in metamaterials fabricated from ferromagnetic microwires
Ivanov, A. V., Shalygin, A. N., Vedyaev, A. V., & Ivanov, V. A. (2007) · JETP Letters · doi:10.1134/s0021364007110082 · Cited by 6
Motion in noninertial systems: Theory and demonstrations
Kugler, M. (1989) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.16072 · Cited by 5
Localization of Massless Spinning Particles and the Berry PhasePreprint
Skagerstam, B.-S. (1992) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9210054 · Cited by 5
Channel non-orthogonality effects on the heavy-ion transfer polarization potential
Hussein, M. S., Cantó, J., & Donangelo, R. (1984) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)90025-x · Cited by 4
The optical Magnus effect in a fibre with a confined parabolic refractive index profile
Kundikova, N. D., & Chaptsova, G. V. (1999) · Journal of Optics A Pure and Applied Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4258/1/3/002 · Cited by 4
Electromagnetic Spin-Orbit Interactions via ScatteringPreprint
Vuong, L. T., Adam, A. J. L., Brok, J. M., et al. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0806.2470
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Rytov S M, 1938, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 18, 263
- Vladimirskii V V, 1941, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 31, 222
- Pancharatnam S, 1975, Collected Works
- Berry M V, 1989, Geometric Phases in Physics, 7
- Horváthy P A, 2006, SIGMA, 2, 090
- Dandoloff R, 1989, J. Physique, 22, L461
- Fedorov F I, 1955, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 105, 465
- Punko N N, 1984, JETP Lett., 39, 20
- Fedoseev V G, 1985, Opt. Spectrosc. (USSR), 58, 296
- Volyar A V, 1992, Ukr. Fiz. Zh., 37, 1468
- Volyar A V, 1998, Opt. Atmos. Okeana, 11, 1199
- Volyar A V, 1999, Opt. Spektrosc., 86, 593
- Baranova N B, 1994, JETP Lett., 59, 232
- Zel’dovich B Y, 1994, JETP Lett., 59, 766
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spin–orbit interactions of light
Bliokh, K. Y., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Nori, F., & Zayats, A. V. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.201 · Cited by 2,276
Self-citationTransverse and longitudinal angular momenta of light
Bliokh, K. Y., & Nori, F. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.06.003 · Cited by 954
“account the spin–orbit interaction in Maxwell equations with ‘‘semi-classical’’ wavelength-order corrections [196], one can derive the helicity-dependent corrections to the traditional geometrical-optics equations for the trajectory of light [63,65,67, 173,180].”
BackgroundSelf-citationGoos–Hänchen and Imbert–Fedorov beam shifts: an overview
Bliokh, K. Y., & Aiello, A. (2013) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8978/15/1/014001 · Cited by 639
Self-citationMarrucci, L., Karimi, E., Slussarenko, S., Piccirillo, B., Santamato, E., Nagali, E., & Sciarrino, F. (2011) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8978/13/6/064001 · Cited by 510
“Related spin-orbit optical phenomena are the polarization “geometrodynam-ics” [56, 57] and the polarization-based optical sensing of nano-particle displacements [58].”
Angular momenta and spin-orbit interaction of nonparaxial light in free space
Bliokh, K. Y., Alonso, M. A., Ostrovskaya, E. A., & Aiello, A. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.063825 · Cited by 319
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bliokh, K. Y.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bliokh, Konstantin Y
- ORCID
- Bliokh, Konstantin Y
- Venue
- Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-08-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 094009
- ISSN
- 1464-4258 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3567
- OpenAlex
- W2062673708
- Semantic Scholar
- 9c34209b9b5360bc9bb49a558828f9a34020ee7f
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 162
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of Optics A Pure and Applied Optics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
- Keywords
- Berry phase, spin Hall effect, geometrical optics, polarized light, rotating coordinate system, polarization evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
