Cited by 177Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictions from an anisotropic inflationary era

Open access
Pitrou, Cyril, Pereira, Thiago S, Uzan, Jean-Philippe·2008·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

This paper investigates the predictions of an inflationary phase starting from a homogeneous and anisotropic universe of the Bianchi I type. After discussing the evolution of the background spacetime, focusing on the number of e -folds and the isotropization, we solve the perturbation equations and predict the power spectra of the curvature perturbations and gravity waves at the end of inflation. The main features of the early anisotropic phase is (1) a dependence of the spectra on the direction of the modes, (2) a coupling between curvature perturbations and gravity waves and (3) the fact that the two gravity wave polarizations do not share the same spectrum on large scales. All these effects are significant only on large scales and die out on small scales where isotropy is recovered. They depend on a characteristic scale that can, but a priori must not, be tuned to some observable scale. To fix the initial conditions, we propose a procedure that generalizes the one standardly used in inflation but that takes into account the fact that the WKB regime is violated at early times when the shear dominates. We stress that there exist modes that do not satisfy the WKB condition during the shear-dominated regime and for which the amplitude at the end of inflation depends on unknown initial conditions. On such scales, inflation loses its predictability. This study paves the way for the determination of the cosmological signature of a primordial shear, whatever the Bianchi I spacetime. It thus stresses the importance of the WKB regime to draw inflationary predictions and demonstrates that, when the number of e -folds is large enough, the predictions converge toward those of inflation in a Friedmann–Lemaître spacetime but that they are less robust in the case of an inflationary era with a small number of e -folds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seemingly anomalous correlations have already been detected among the low-multipole CMB anisotropies, which might indicate deviations from statistical isotropy in the inflationary spectrum.

    “Indeed, seemingly anomalous correlations have already been detected among the low-multipole CMB anisotropies [20,21,22,23,24], which might indicate deviations from statistical isotropy in the inflationary spectrum.”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction links possible large-scale CMB anomalies to a preferred direction in primordial power spectra, and the discussion of primordial spectra describes a possible breakdown of statistical isotropy as an indication awaiting confirmation. The paper does not specifically report detected correlations among low-multipole CMB anisotropies; its treatment of the observational evidence is more tentative. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Periodicity in one of our large spatial dimensions has not been observed, indicating that the physical circumference of the closed z dimension must be greater than the physical diameter of the surface of last scattering.

    “The second important relationship comes from realizing that periodicity in one of our large spatial dimensions has not been observed (see e.g.[20]), indicating that the physical circumference of the closed z dimension must be greater than the physical diameter of the surface of last scattering, or”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [20]

    The discussion of primordial spectra addresses CMB signatures of anisotropic inflation, not an observed absence of spatial periodicity. Searches for periodicity, a closed spatial dimension, and the diameter of the surface of last scattering found no passage establishing the claimed circumference bound; the cited paper’s pages were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. Linde A D, 1990, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, 10.1201/b16971 · DOI
  2. Peter P, 2005, Cosmologie Primordiale
  3. Bernardeau F, 2007, Cosmologie, des Fondement Théoriques aux Observations
  4. Mukhanov V, 1981, JETP Lett., 33, 532
  5. 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90373-2 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/0370-2693(85)90436-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5437 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00032-X · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.123512 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Komatsu E, 2006, Phys. Rep., 402, 103
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.R535 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.103506 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.121301 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Osano B, 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2007, 003, 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/04/003 · DOI
  16. Maldacena J, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 2003, 013, 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083004 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0370-1573(90)90144-Q · DOI
  19. 10.1086/151965 · DOI
  20. Barrow J D, 1982, Q. J. R. Astron. Soc., 23, 344
  21. 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90263-0 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevD.32.2522 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0370-2693(85)90245-X · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90126-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.34.931 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevD.35.1146 · DOI
  27. Patcher T, 1987, Eur. Phys. Lett., 4, 1211, 10.1209/0295-5075/4/10/022 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0370-2693(86)91488-7 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90135-6 · DOI
  30. Raychaudhuri A, 1988, Class. Quantum Grav., 5, 225, 10.1088/0264-9381/5/1/026 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.6065 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084029 · DOI
  33. Barrow J D, 2006, Class. Quantum Grav., 23, 3053, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/17/012 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.063509 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.063506 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.124001 · DOI
  37. Aguirregabiria J, 2004, Class. Quantum Grav., 21, 823, 10.1088/0264-9381/21/4/005 · DOI
  38. 10.1023/A:1020087004012 · DOI
  39. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.07043.x · DOI
  40. Mukhanov V F, 1985, Pis. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 41, 402
  41. Mukhanov V F, 1985, JETP Lett., 41, 493
  42. 10.1143/PTP.76.1036 · DOI
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.123511 · DOI
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevD.34.3570 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3562 · DOI
  46. 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.087302 · DOI
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1970 · DOI
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.2147 · DOI
  49. Zeldovich Y B, 1972, Sov. Phys. JETP, 34, 1159
  50. 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.368 · DOI
  51. Pereira T S, 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2007, 006, 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/09/006 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Gümrükçüoglu A E, 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2007, 005, 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/11/005 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1086/382267 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.221301 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.071301 · DOI
  57. 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.083508 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/nature01944 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.103518 · DOI
  60. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.103514 · DOI
  61. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.043003 · DOI
  62. 10.2996/kmj/1050496653 · DOI
  63. Gausmann E, 2001, Class. Quantum Grav., 18, 5155, 10.1088/0264-9381/18/23/311 · DOI
  64. Lehoucq R, 2002, Class. Quantum Grav., 19, 4683, 10.1088/0264-9381/19/18/305 · DOI
  65. Barrow J D, 2001, Class. Quantum Grav., 18, 1753, 10.1088/0264-9381/18/9/310 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1086/444454 · DOI
  67. 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083502 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Marteens R, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 309, L7
  69. 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1525 · DOI
  70. 10.1086/303633 · DOI
  71. 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.1901 · DOI
  72. Martinez-Gonzalez E, 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 300, 346
  73. 10.1086/149127 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Ryan M P, 1975, Homogeneous Relativistic Cosmologies
  75. 10.1007/BF01645908 · DOI
  76. Lidsey J E, 1992, Class. Quantum Grav., 9, 1239, 10.1088/0264-9381/9/5/008 · DOI
  77. 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.083512 · DOI
  78. 10.1103/RevModPhys.69.373 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/0370-1573(93)90114-S · DOI
  80. Sarkar S, 1996, Rep. Prog. Phys., 59, 1493, 10.1088/0034-4885/59/12/001 · DOI
  81. 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.023510 · DOI
  82. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.920 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00838-8 · DOI
  84. 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2380 · DOI
  85. 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.105012 · DOI
  86. Maldacena J, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 2003, 013, 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063529 · DOI
  88. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063520 · DOI
  89. 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043514 · DOI
  90. 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.023508 · DOI
  91. 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.103529 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pitrou, C., Pereira, T. S., & Uzan, J.-P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2008-04-03
Volume
2008
Issue
04
Pages
004
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W2040268923
Cited by
177
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
anisotropic inflation, Bianchi type I cosmology, curvature perturbations, gravitational waves, power spectrum, WKB approximation, initial conditions, e-folds, isotropization, polarization spectra, primordial anisotropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review