Cited by 361Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imprints of a primordial preferred direction on the microwave background

Open access

Abstract

Rotational invariance is a well-established feature of low-energy physics. Violations of this symmetry must be extremely small today, but could have been larger in earlier epochs. In this paper we examine the consequences of a small breaking of rotational invariance during the inflationary era when the primordial density fluctuations were generated. Assuming that a fixed-norm vector picked out a preferred-direction during the inflationary era, we explore the imprint it would leave on the cosmic microwave background anisotropy, and provide explicit formulas for the expected amplitudes $⟨{a}_{lm}{a}_{{l}^{\ensuremath{'}}{m}^{\ensuremath{'}}}^{*}⟩$ of the spherical-harmonic coefficients. We suggest that it is natural to expect that the imprint on the primordial power spectrum of a preferred spatial direction is approximately scale-invariant, and examine a simple model in which this is true.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.75.083502

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Background anisotropy present at the onset of inflation generates statistical anisotropy in quantum fluctuations as they expand beyond the Hubble radius, and this can modify the spectrum of primordial density perturbations.

    “Although the initial anisotropy rapidly redshifts away, background anisotropy present at the onset of inflation will generate statistical anisotropy in quantum fluctuations as they expand beyond the Hubble radius, and this in turn can modify the spectrum of primordial density perturbations [16,17,18,19].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that fluctuations redshift beyond the Hubble radius and that broken rotational invariance changes the primordial power spectrum. Section III (page unavailable) calculates a direction-dependent fluctuation spectrum in an anisotropic inflation model. But the paper models anisotropy persisting through inflation until its end; it does not establish the citing sentence’s claim that initial anisotropy rapidly redshifts away. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. V. F. Mukhanov, 1981, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 33, 549
  2. V. F. Mukhanov, 1981, JETP Lett., 33, 532
  3. 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90541-X · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1110 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90373-2 · DOI
  6. S. Dodelson, 2003, Modern Cosmology
  7. 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.748 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00128-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1086/186504 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/310075 · DOI
  12. 10.1086/379345 · DOI
  13. 10.1086/505559 · DOI
  14. 10.1086/379099 · DOI
  15. 10.1086/379783 · DOI
  16. 10.1086/375508 · DOI
  17. 10.1086/421105 · DOI
  18. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06354.x · DOI
  19. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06563.x · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08206.x · DOI
  21. 10.1051/0004-6361:20021850 · DOI
  22. 10.1051/0004-6361:20042416 · DOI
  23. 10.1086/338879 · DOI
  24. 10.1086/324437 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.1864 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1231 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00638-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.116002 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1086/382267 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1086/421972 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043515 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.221301 · DOI · Paper page
  34. F. K. Hansen, 2004, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 354, 1714
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.083508 · DOI
  36. 10.1086/427897 · DOI
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.071301 · DOI
  38. 10.1086/444454 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09980.x · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10078.x · DOI
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.151303 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.063506 · DOI
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.123521 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.newar.2006.09.013 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.newar.2006.09.007 · DOI
  46. 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/10/016 · DOI
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.043002 · DOI
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.103002 · DOI
  49. 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/03/002 · DOI
  50. 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.063529 · DOI
  51. 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.041302 · DOI
  52. 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.041301 · DOI
  53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.131302 · DOI
  54. L. Campanelli, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 209903, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.209903 · DOI
  55. 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063504 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1103/PhysRevD.40.1886 · DOI
  57. 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.024028 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.024003 · DOI
  59. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123525 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.064005 · DOI
  61. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.105009 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.023505 · DOI
  63. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083505 · DOI
  64. 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043514 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ackerman, L., Carroll, S. M., & Wise, M. B.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2007-04-05
Volume
75
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2037232212
Cited by
361
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 31
FWCI
15.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
cosmic microwave background anisotropies, primordial density fluctuations, inflation (cosmology), spherical harmonic coefficients, primordial power spectrum, scale invariance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review