Cited by 67Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural dynamics and brain function

Longevity and reliability of chronic unit recordings using the Utah, intracortical multi-electrode arrays

Open access
Sponheim, Caleb, Papadourakis, Vasileios, Collinger, Jennifer L, Downey, John, Weiss, Jeffrey, Pentousi, Lida, Elliott, Kaisa, Hatsopoulos, Nicholas G.·2021·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Objective. Microelectrode arrays are standard tools for conducting chronic electrophysiological experiments, allowing researchers to simultaneously record from large numbers of neurons. Specifically, Utah electrode arrays (UEAs) have been utilized by scientists in many species, including rodents, rhesus macaques, marmosets, and human participants. The field of clinical human brain-computer interfaces currently relies on the UEA as a number of research groups have clearance from the United States Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for this device through the investigational device exemption pathway. Despite its widespread usage in systems neuroscience, few studies have comprehensively evaluated the reliability and signal quality of the Utah array over long periods of time in a large dataset. Approach. We collected and analyzed over 6000 recorded datasets from various cortical areas spanning almost nine years of experiments, totaling 17 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and 2 human subjects, and 55 separate microelectrode Utah arrays. The scale of this dataset allowed us to evaluate the average life of these arrays, based primarily on the signal-to-noise ratio of each electrode over time. Main results. Using implants in primary motor, premotor, prefrontal, and somatosensory cortices, we found that the average lifespan of available recordings from UEAs was 622 days, although we provide several examples of these UEAs lasting over 1000 days and one up to 9 years; human implants were also shown to last longer than non-human primate implants. We also found that electrode length did not affect longevity and quality, but iridium oxide metallization on the electrode tip exhibited superior yield as compared to platinum metallization. Significance. Understanding longevity and reliability of microelectrode array recordings allows researchers to set expectations and plan experiments accordingly and maximize the amount of high-quality data gathered. Our results suggest that one can expect chronic unit recordings to last at least two years, with the possibility for arrays to last the better part of a decade.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/ac3eaf

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Utah Microelectrode Array uses an external power mechanism and offers longevity with some lasting over 2.7 years and one case up to 9 years.

    “Similarly, the Utah Microelectrode Array (UEA) uses an external power mechanism, offering longevity with some lasting over 2.7 years, and even one case up to 9 years (Sponheim et al., 2021).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Sponheim et al., 2021

    The Abstract’s Main Results report several UEA recordings lasting over 1,000 days (more than 2.7 years) and one lasting up to nine years. The Methods describe cable-connected data acquisition, but do not establish the claim that the UEA uses an external power mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Polikov VS, Tresco PA, Reichert WM. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2005. 16198003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sponheim, C., Papadourakis, V., Collinger, J. L., Downey, J., Weiss, J., Pentousi, L., Elliott, K., & Hatsopoulos, N. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Hatsopoulos, Nicholas G.
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2021-12-01
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
066044
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W3215420535
Cited by
66
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS045853)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-10-C-4056)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
Utah electrode array, chronic electrophysiology, signal-to-noise ratio, electrode reliability, platinum metallization, rhesus monkeys, primary motor cortex, prefrontal cortex, somatosensory cortex, premotor cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrodes, Implanted, Longevity, Macaca mulatta, Microelectrodes, Utah, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review