Cited by 75Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesPain Management and Treatment

Long-term performance of Utah slanted electrode arrays and intramuscular electromyographic leads implanted chronically in human arm nerves and muscles

Open access
George, Jacob A, Page, David M, Davis, Tyler S, Duncan, Christopher C, Hutchinson, Douglas T, Rieth, Loren W, Clark, Gregory A·2020·Journal of Neural Engineering

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We explore the long-term performance and stability of seven percutaneous Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays (USEAs) and intramuscular recording leads (iEMGs) implanted chronically in the residual arm nerves and muscles of three human participants as a means to permanently restore sensorimotor function after transradial amputations. APPROACH: We quantify the number of functional recording and functional stimulating electrodes over time. We also calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of USEA and iEMG recordings and quantify the stimulation current necessary to evoke detectable sensory percepts. Furthermore, we quantify the consistency of the sensory modality, receptive field location, and receptive field size of USEA-evoked percepts. MAIN RESULTS: In the most recent subject, involving USEAs with technical improvements, neural recordings persisted for 502 d (entire implant duration) and the number of functional recording electrodes for one USEA increased over time. However, for six out of seven USEAs across the three participants, the number of functional recording electrodes decreased within the first 2 months after implantation. The SNR of neural recordings and electromyographic recordings stayed relatively consistent over time. Sensory percepts were consistently evoked over the span of 14 months, were not significantly different in size, and highlighted the nerves' fascicular organization. The percentage of percepts with consistent modality or consistent receptive field location between sessions (∼1 month apart) varied between 0%-86.2% and 9.1%-100%, respectively. Stimulation thresholds and electrode impedances increased initially but then remained relatively stable over time. SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates improved performance of USEAs, and provides a basis for comparing the longevity and stability of USEAs to that of other neural interfaces. USEAs provide a rich repertoire of neural recordings and sensory percepts. Although their performance still generally declines over time, functionality can persist long-term. Future work should leverage the results presented here to further improve USEA design or to develop adaptive algorithms that can maintain a high level of performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/abc025

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UEAs have been successfully implanted in human subjects in numerous studies and these devices have continued to work for many years.

    “Although the duration of this study was limited to 6 months, UEAs have been successfully implanted in human subjects in numerous studies (25-29) and these devices have continued to work for many years.”

    From Visual percepts evoked with an intracortical 96-channel microelectrode array inserted in human occipital cortex (2021) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Discussion (p. 13) says Utah slanted electrode arrays had been implanted in seven human amputees and that recording functionality was demonstrated through 502 days. This supports human implantation and continued function beyond a year, but not the claim that the devices continued to work for many years. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, J. A., Page, D. M., Davis, T. S., Duncan, C. C., Hutchinson, D. T., Rieth, L. W., & Clark, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Avanos Medical (United States) (US)
  • Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US)
Corresponding author
George, Jacob A
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2020-10-31
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
056042
ISSN
1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091784096
Cited by
75
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-15-C-4017)
  • National Science Foundation (GRFP-1747505, NSF ECCS-1533649)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
transradial amputation, sensory feedback, receptive fields, signal-to-noise ratio, stimulation threshold, electrode impedance, peripheral nerve recording
MeSH terms
Arm, Artificial Limbs, Electrodes, Implanted, Humans, Microelectrodes, Muscles, Utah

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review