Cited by 35Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

‘Who is the ideal candidate?’: decisions and issues relating to visual neuroprosthesis development, patient testing and neuroplasticity.

Merabet, Lotfi B, Rizzo, Joseph F, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, Fernandez, Eduardo·2007·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Appropriate delivery of electrical stimulation to intact visual structures can evoke patterned sensations of light in individuals who have been blind for many years. This pivotal finding has lent credibility to the concept of restoring functional vision by artificial means. As numerous groups worldwide pursue human clinical testing with visual prosthetic devices, it is becoming increasingly clear that there remains a considerable gap between the challenges of prosthetic device development and the rehabilitative strategies needed to implement this new technology in patients. An important area of future work will be the development of appropriate pre- and post-implantation measures of performance and establishing candidate selection criteria in order to quantify technical advances, guide future device design and optimize therapeutic success. We propose that the selection of an 'ideal' candidate should also be considered within the context of the variable neuroplastic changes that follow vision loss. Specifically, an understanding of the adaptive and compensatory changes that occur within the brain could assist in guiding the development of post-implantation rehabilitative strategies and optimize behavioral outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/4/1/s15

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merabet, L. B., Rizzo, J. F., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fernandez, E.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2007-02-26
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
S130-S135
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2042591526
Cited by
35
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, blind patients, candidate selection, neuroplasticity, vision loss, vision restoration, performance indicators
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Decision Making, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Prognosis, Prosthesis Design, United States, Vision Disorders, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Equipment Failure Analysis, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review