The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system
Open accessAbstract
Three-dimensional (3D) cell-printing has been emerging as a promising technology with which to build up human skin models by enabling rapid and versatile design. Despite the technological advances, challenges remain in the development of fully functional models that recapitulate complexities in the native tissue. Moreover, although several approaches have been explored for the development of biomimetic human skin models, the present skin models based on multistep fabrication methods using polydimethylsiloxane chips and commercial transwell inserts could be tackled by leveraging 3D cell-printing technology. In this paper, we present a new 3D cell-printing strategy for engineering a 3D human skin model with a functional transwell system in a single-step process. A hybrid 3D cell-printing system was developed, allowing for the use of extrusion and inkjet modules at the same time. We began by revealing the significance of each module in engineering human skin models; by using the extrusion-dispensing module, we engineered a collagen-based construct with polycaprolactone (PCL) mesh that prevented the contraction of collagen during tissue maturation; the inkjet-based dispensing module was used to uniformly distribute keratinocytes. Taking these features together, we engineered a human skin model with a functional transwell system; the transwell system and fibroblast-populated dermis were consecutively fabricated by using the extrusion modules. Following this process, keratinocytes were uniformly distributed onto the engineered dermis by the inkjet module. Our transwell system indicates a supportive 3D construct composed of PCL, enabling the maturation of a skin model without the aid of commercial transwell inserts. This skin model revealed favorable biological characteristics that included a stabilized fibroblast-stretched dermis and stratified epidermis layers after 14 days. It was also observed that a 50 times reduction in cost was achieved and 10 times less medium was used than in a conventional culture. Collectively, because this single-step process opens up chances for versatile designs, we envision that our cell-printing strategy could provide an attractive platform in engineering various human skin models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2958 · Cited by 7,034
3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues
Mandrycky, C., Wang, Z., Kim, K., & Kim, D.-H. (2016) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011 · Cited by 1,754
Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting
Ozbolat, I. T., & Hospodiuk, M. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076 · Cited by 1,572
Deterministically patterned biomimetic human iPSC-derived hepatic model via rapid 3D bioprinting
Ma, X., Qu, X., Zhu, W., Li, Y.-S., Yuan, S., Zhang, H., Liu, J., Wang, P., Lai, C. S. E., Zanella, F., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1524510113 · Cited by 872
Photocrosslinkable Gelatin Hydrogel for Epidermal Tissue Engineering
Zhao, X., Lang, Q., Yildirimer, L., Lin, Z. Y., Cui, W., Annabi, N., Ng, K. W., Dokmeci, M. R., Ghaemmaghami, A. M., & Khademhosseini, A. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201500005 · Cited by 832
Metcalfe, A. D., & Ferguson, M. W. J. (2007) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0179 · Cited by 785
Getting under the skin of epidermal morphogenesis
Fuchs, E., & Raghavan, S. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg758 · Cited by 753
Design and Fabrication of Human Skin by Three-Dimensional Bioprinting
Lee, V., Singh, G., Trasatti, J. P., Bjornsson, C., Xu, X., Tran, T. N., Yoo, S.-S., Dai, G., & Karande, P. (2014) · Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods · doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0335 · Cited by 725
Xu, T., Binder, K. W., Albanna, M. Z., Dice, D., Zhao, W., Yoo, J. J., & Atala, A. (2012) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5082/5/1/015001 · Cited by 631
Cited by
Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering
Matai, I., Kaur, G., Seyedsalehi, A., McClinton, A., & Laurencin, C. T. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 · Cited by 1,156
Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review
Nikolova, M. P., & Chavali, M. S. (2019) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005 · Cited by 907
Askari, M., Afzali Naniz, M., Kouhi, M., Saberi, A., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2021) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d0bm00973c · Cited by 369
“Kim et al. 108 used this method to fabricate collagen-based sca ff olds with a poly( ε -caprolactone) PCL mesh, to form the dermal component of a skin substitute.”
MethodInfluentialRamasamy, S., Davoodi, P., Vijayavenkataraman, S., Teoh, J. H., Thamizhchelvan, A. M., Robinson, K. S., Wu, B., Fuh, J. Y. H., DiColandrea, T., Zhao, H., et al. (2021) · Bioprinting · doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00123 · Cited by 96
The future of skin toxicology testing–three-dimensional bioprinting meets microfluidics
Ng, W. L., & Yeong, W. Y. (2019) · International Journal of Bioprinting · doi:10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.237 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, B. S., Lee, J.-S., Gao, G., & Cho, D.-W.
- Venue
- Biofabrication
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-06-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 025034
- ISSN
- 1758-5082 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5090
- OpenAlex
- W2621963256
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1758-5090/aa71c8
- The paper
- Kim, B. S., Lee, J.-S., Gao, G., & Cho, D.-W. (2017). Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system. Biofabrication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa71c8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.