Cited by 158Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Engagement in Mindfulness Practices by U.S. Adults: Sociodemographic Barriers

Open access
Olano, Henry A., Kachan, Diana, Tannenbaum, Stacey L., Mehta, Ashwin, Annane, Debra, Lee, David J.·2015·The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of sociodemographic factors on mindfulness practices. METHODS: National Health Interview Survey Alternative Medicine Supplement data were used to examine sociodemographic predictors of engagement in meditation, yoga, tai chi, and qigong. RESULTS: Greater education was associated with mindfulness practices (odds ratio [OR], 4.02 [95% confidence interval [CI], 3.50-4.61]), men were half as likely as women to engage in any practice, and lower engagement was found among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics. CONCLUSION: Vulnerable population groups with worse health outcomes were less likely to engage in mindfulness practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/acm.2014.0269

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • National Health Interview Survey data show that education level, race/ethnicity, and sex/gender predict engagement with mindfulness practices.

    “For example, National Health Interview Survey data show that education level, race/ethnicity, and sex/gender (here we refer to sex/gender differences to indicate agnosticism over whether differences in mindfulness engagement between men and women reflect biologically or socially influenced differences or a complex combination) predict engagement with mindfulness practices.33”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olano, H. A., Kachan, D., Tannenbaum, S. L., Mehta, A., Annane, D., & Lee, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Olano, Henry A.
Venue
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Published
2015-02
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
100-102
ISSN
  • 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7708
OpenAlex
W2015944910
Cited by
158
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (F30AG040886)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2R01OH003915)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness practice, meditation, yoga, Tai Chi, qigong, sociodemographic barriers, educational attainment, gender differences, racial and ethnic disparities, vulnerable populations, complementary and alternative medicine use
MeSH terms
Adult, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Yoga, Meditation, Tai Ji, Vulnerable Populations, Mindfulness, Qigong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review