The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
General Anesthesia and Human Brain Connectivity
Open accessAbstract
General anesthesia consists of amnesia, hypnosis, analgesia, and areflexia. Of these, the mechanism of hypnosis, or loss of consciousness, has been the most elusive, yet a fascinating problem. How anesthetic agents suppress human consciousness has been investigated with neuroimaging for two decades. Anesthetics substantially reduce the global cerebral metabolic rate and blood flow with a degree of regional heterogeneity characteristic to the anesthetic agent. The thalamus appears to be a common site of modulation by several anesthetics, but this may be secondary to cortical effects. Stimulus-dependent brain activation is preserved in primary sensory areas, suggesting that unconsciousness cannot be explained by cortical deafferentation or a diminution of cortical sensory reactivity. The effect of general anesthetics in functional and effective connectivity is varied depending on the agent, dose, and network studied. At an anesthetic depth characterized by the subjects' unresponsiveness, a partial, but not complete, reduction in connectivity is generally observed. Functional connectivity of the frontoparietal association cortex is often reduced, but a causal role of this change for the loss of consciousness remains uncertain. Functional connectivity of the nonspecific (intralaminar) thalamic nuclei is preferentially reduced by propofol. Higher-order thalamocortical connectivity is also reduced with certain anesthetics. The changes in functional connectivity during anesthesia induction and emergence do not mirror each other; the recovery from anesthesia may involve increases in functional connectivity above the normal wakeful baseline. Anesthetic loss of consciousness is not a block of corticofugal information transfer, but a disruption of higher-order cortical information integration. The prime candidates for functional networks of the forebrain that play a critical role in maintaining the state of consciousness are those based on the posterior parietal-cingulate-precuneus region and the nonspecific thalamus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
Controlled Sedation with Alphaxalone-Alphadolone
Ramsay, M. A. E., Savege, T. M., Simpson, B. R. J., & Goodwin, R. (1974) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656 · Cited by 2,861
Detecting awareness in the vegetative state
Owen, A. M., Coleman, M. R., Boly, M., Davis, M. H., Laureys, S., & Pickard, J. D. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1130197 · Cited by 1,978
An information integration theory of consciousness
Tononi, G. (2004) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-5-42 · Cited by 1,958 · cited 3×
“When both agents were titrated to similar sedative-hypnotic end-points, propofol (1.2 and 2.7 l g/mL) decreased rCBF in the anterior brain regions, whereas thiopental (4.8 and 10.6 l g/ mL) decreased rCBF primarily in the cerebellar and posterior brain regions (Veselis et al., 1997, 2004).”
InfluentialIntrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain
Vincent, J. L., Patel, G. H., Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Baker, J. T., Van Essen, D. C., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, L. H., Corbetta, M., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05758 · Cited by 1,786
Tononi, G. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5395.1846 · Cited by 1,561
Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep
Massimini, M., Ferrarelli, F., Huber, R., Esser, S. K., Singh, H., & Tononi, G. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117256 · Cited by 1,534
Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto
Tononi, G. (2008) · The Biological Bulletin · doi:10.2307/25470707 · Cited by 1,529
Crick, F., & Koch, C. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0203-119 · Cited by 1,492
Cited by
What insects can tell us about the origins of consciousness.
Barron, A. B., & Klein, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1520084113 · Cited by 446
General anesthesia decouples cortical pyramidal neurons
Suzuki, M., & Larkum, M. E. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.024 · Cited by 348
Bonhomme, V., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Demertzi, A., Bruno, M.-A., Jaquet, O., Bahri, M. A., Plenevaux, A., Boly, M., Boveroux, P., Soddu, A., et al. (2016) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000001275 · Cited by 207
Coupling the State and Contents of Consciousness
Aru, J., Suzuki, M., Rutiku, R., Larkum, M. E., & Bachmann, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2019.00043 · Cited by 164
Disconnecting Consciousness: Is There a Common Anesthetic End Point?
Hudetz, A. G., & Mashour, G. A. (2016) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000001353 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudetz, A. G.
- Venue
- Brain Connectivity
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 291-302
- ISSN
- 2158-0014 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-0022
- OpenAlex
- W1985673618
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General Anesthesia and Human Brain Connectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/brain.2012.0107
- The paper
- Hudetz, A. G. (2012). General Anesthesia and Human Brain Connectivity. Brain Connectivity. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2012.0107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.