Cited by 22Obesity, Physical Activity, DietSleep and related disordersPhysical Activity and Health

Prospective Associations between Weekend Catch-Up Sleep, Physical Activity, and Childhood Obesity

Huang, Wendy Yajun, Wong, Stephen Heung Sang·2019·Childhood Obesity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catch-up sleep and low physical activity on weekends have been commonly documented. Preliminary evidence on Chinese children, however, has shown a variety of weekly physical activity patterns. This study examined the prospective associations between weekend catch-up patterns of sleep and physical activity and obesity over a 2-year period in Chinese children. METHODS: Prospective data from 599 children in the Understand Children's Activity and Nutrition (UCAN) cohort study were analyzed. Weekly patterns of obesogenic behaviors (physical activity and sleep duration) were assessed annually over a 2-year period. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time were determined by ActiGraph accelerometry. Data on sleep durations and sociodemographic factors were obtained from parental-reported questionnaires. Weekend catch-up sleep and MVPA patterns were calculated and examined in relation to childhood obesity after controlling for sociodemographic variables and sedentary time. RESULTS: Every additional hour of average weekly sleep duration was associated with a 16% decrease in the odds of obesity (OR: 0.841, 95%CI: 0.709 - 0.999). After adjustment of average sleep duration, weekend sleep catch-up categories showed no association with obesity risk. Over a 2-year period, half of the children demonstrated weekend catch-up MVPA. Weekend catch-up MVPA for less than 20 minutes (OR: 0.473, 95%CI: 0.258 - 0.867) or more than 20 minutes (OR: 0.505, 95%CI: 0.257 - 0.993) were both related to lower risk of obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend catch-up sleep did not ameliorate the risk of childhood obesity, whereas weekend catch-up MVPA did reduce that risk. More research is needed to explore the factors contributing to these obesogenic behavior patterns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/chi.2018.0158

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, W. Y., & Wong, S. H. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Sport and Physical Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Wong, Stephen Heung Sang
Venue
Childhood Obesity
Published
2019-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
40-47
ISSN
  • 2153-2168 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-2176
OpenAlex
W2894572659
Cited by
22
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Childhood Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
catch-up sleep, weekend catch-up sleep, physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary time, sleep duration, obesogenic behaviors, Chinese children
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Time Factors, Health Behavior, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Odds Ratio, Sedentary Behavior, Accelerometry, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review