Defining Cyberbullying: A Qualitative Research into the Perceptions of Youngsters

In the citing paper

“At a descriptive level young people equated cyberbullying with”

In the citing paper

“Three studies were judged to be less valuable because of a lack of clarity across the CASP domains, particularly with regard to research methods (Burnham & Wright, 2012;Smith et al., 2008;Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008).”

In the citing paper

“However, anonymous acts can make it difficult for a victim to determine a perpetrator's identity (Mishna et al., 2009;Nocentini et al., 2010;Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008).”

In the citing paper

“It was suggested that knowing the identity of the individual behind a cyberbullying act “made it possible to put the action into perspective…and to react accordingly” (Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008, p. 502).”

In the citing paper

“A large overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying was noted, with victims sometimes targets of both (Jacobs et al., 2015;Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008).”

In the citing paper

“A Belgian study outlined that “in some instances, persons who were perceived as more powerful in real life” and therefore, unlikely to be victims of bullying in the physical world, “were the target of cyber-attacks” (Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008, p. 502).”

In the citing paper

“Young people in a Belgian study who perpetrated cyberbullying explained that “they had mostly operated anonymously or disguised themselves and that their victims were often people they also knew in the real world” (Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008, p. 501).”

In the citing paper

“It should be noted that their understanding of this attribute is largely based on findings from qualitative studies with young people (Ševčíková, Šmahel, & Otavová, 2012;Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008), one of which is included in this meta-ethnography (Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008).”