Cited by 30Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

ESTONIAN STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION AND DEFINITION OF CYBERBULLYING; pp. 323–343

Open access
Naruskov, Karin, Luik, Piret, Nocentini, Annalaura, Menesini, Ersilia·2012·Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

Abstract

Rapid development of information and communication technologies is having a direct impact on the lives of adolescents, and a new form of bullying has emerged. This study aims to examine how Estonian students perceive and define cyberbullying based on five cyberbullying criteria (imbalance of power, intention, repetition, anonymity, and publicity/privacy) and four types of cyberbullying behaviour (written-verbal, visual, exclusion, and impersonation). A quali-quanti approach was used consisting of focus groups and a questionnaire. Two mixed-gender focus groups of 12- and 15-year-old students were interviewed to deepen their perception in relation to cyberbullying criteria and behaviours. Results were used for the quantitative study. The questionnaire was conducted with 336 adolescents from twelve Estonian schools, aged from 11 to 17 years. Results by MDS revealed a two-dimensional model characterized by imbalance of power and anonymity. This study can help to improve understanding of the phenomenon with respect to student perceptions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3176/tr.2012.4.02

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Li, Qing (2007) "Bullying in the new playground: research into cyberbullying and cyber victimiza- tion". Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 23, 4, 435-454.
  2. Mishna, Faye, Michael Saini and Steven Solomon (2009) "Ongoing and online: children and youth's perception of cyberbullying." Children and Youth Services Review 31, 12, 1222-1228.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naruskov, K., Luik, P., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • University of Florence (IT)
Venue
Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2012-11-26
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
323-343
ISSN
1406-0922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110827918
Cited by
30
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Tartu Ülikool
  • European Social Fund (1.2.0401.09 – 0070, project no. 1.2.0401.09 – 0070)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, student perceptions, adolescents, power imbalance, anonymity, exclusion, impersonation, Estonian students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review