Cited by 663Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Defining Cyberbullying: A Qualitative Research into the Perceptions of Youngsters

Vandebosch, Heidi, Van Cleemput, Katrien·2008·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

Data from 53 focus groups, which involved students from 10 to 18 years old, show that youngsters often interpret “cyberbullying” as “Internet bullying” and associate the phenomenon with a wide range of practices. In order to be considered “true” cyberbullying, these practices must meet several criteria. They should be intended to hurt (by the perpetrator) and perceived as hurtful (by the victim); be part of a repetitive pattern of negative offline or online actions; and be performed in a relationship characterized by a power imbalance (based on “real-life” power criteria, such as physical strength or age, and/or on ICT-related criteria such as technological know-how and anonymity).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cpb.2007.0042

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerpn, Belgium.
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2008-07-20
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
499-503
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W2115727255
Cited by
663
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 38
FWCI
18.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, definition of cyberbullying, adolescents' perceptions, power imbalance, anonymity, online harassment, victimization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Aggression, Child, Psychology, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Terminology as Topic, Psychology, Social, Reference Values, Social Perception, Focus Groups, Internet, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review