Cited by 686Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile

Calvete, Esther, Orue, Izaskun, Estévez, Ana, Villardón, Lourdes, Padilla, Patricia·2010·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P.
Affiliations
Universidad de Deusto (ES)
Corresponding author
Calvete, Esther
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
1128-1135
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056641475
Cited by
686
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 25
FWCI
34.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, adolescents, aggressor profile, proactive aggression, reactive aggression, justification of violence, violence exposure, peer acceptance, peer rejection, perceived social support, gender differences, psychometric validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review