Cited by 79Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Blaming the Victim: The Effects of Extraversion and Information Disclosure on Guilt Attributions in Cyberbullying

Weber, Mathias, Ziegele, Marc, Schnauber, Anna·2013·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

Cyberbullying victims' success in coping with bullying largely depends on schoolmates and other bystanders' social support. However, factors influencing the degree of social support have as yet not been investigated. In this article, the concept of victim blaming is applied to cyberbullying incidents. It is assumed that a cyberbullying victim receives less social support when the victim's behavior is perceived as very overt. It is further assumed that this effect's underlying process is the partial attribution of responsibility for the incident to the victim and not to the bully. The hypotheses are tested with a 2×2 online experiment. In this experiment, varying online self-presentations of a fictitious female cyberbullying victim were presented to 586 Germans aged 16-22. The victim's public Facebook profile was manipulated in terms of the victim's extraversion and the amount of personal information disclosed. The results support the hypotheses. Participants attributed more responsibility for the bullying incident to the victim when the victim was presented as extraverted and very open in revealing personal information. This diminished social support for the victim. The effect was partially mediated by the victim's perceived attractiveness. The study implies that concepts from victimization research can enhance our understanding of cyberbullying incidents. Among other factors, the victim's specific personal characteristics deserve more consideration--not only with regard to the incident itself but also regarding subsequent social dynamics and coping mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2012.0328

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research showed that cyberbullying was deemed as acceptable when victims were viewed as oversharing personal information online.

    “Similarly with the participants’ views that cyberaggression should be tolerated when seen as a predictable outcome of actions on SM, previous research showed that cyberbullying was deemed as acceptable when victims were viewed as oversharing personal information online (119, 120), highlighting a tendency to justify harmful behaviors based on targets perceived responsibility.”
  • Social support (as opposed to victim-blaming) plays a genuine role in how individuals cope with cyberbullying incidents.

    “Indeed, many researchers have noted that social support (as opposed to victim-blaming) plays a genuine role in how individuals cope with cyberbullying incidents (Weber et al., 2013).”

    From A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Weber et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weber, M., Ziegele, M., & Schnauber, A.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Department of Communication, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2013-04
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
254-259
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2159732105
Cited by
79
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, victim blaming, guilt attribution, social support, extraversion, information disclosure, online self-presentation, Facebook profiles, perceived attractiveness, bystanders, victimization
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Aggression, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Social Support, Crime Victims, Disclosure, Young Adult, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review