Cited by 151Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Systematic review of empirical studies on cyberbullying in adults: What we know and what we should investigate

Open access
Jenaro, Cristina, Flores, Noelia, Frías, Cinthia Patricia·2018·Aggression and Violent Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2017.12.003

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jenaro, C., Flores, N., & Frías, C. P.
Affiliations
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
38
Pages
113-122
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771766480
Cited by
151
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Gredos (University of Salamanca) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, adults, cyberbullying victims, bystanders, aggression, violence, evidence-based practice, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review