Cited by 65Eating Disorders and BehaviorsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Excessive Time on Social Networking Sites and Disordered Eating Behaviors Among Undergraduate Students: Appearance and Weight Esteem as Mediating Pathways.

Murray, Marisa, Maras, Danijela, Goldfield, Gary S.·2016·Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking

Abstract

Social networking sites (SNS) are a popular form of communication among undergraduate students. Body image concerns and disordered eating behaviors are also quite prevalent among this population. Maladaptive use of SNS has been associated with disordered eating behaviors; however, the mechanisms remain unclear. The present study examined if body image concerns (e.g., appearance and weight esteem) mediate the relationship between excessive time spent on SNS and disordered eating behaviors (restrained and emotional eating). The sample included 383 (70.2 percent female) undergraduate students (mean age = 23.08 years, standard deviation = 3.09) who completed self-report questionnaires related to SNS engagement, body image, disordered eating behaviors, and demographics. Parallel multiple mediation and moderated mediation analyses revealed that lower weight and appearance esteem mediated the relationship between excessive time on SNS and restrained eating for males and females, whereas appearance esteem mediated the relationship between excessive time on SNS and emotional eating for females only. The study adds to the literature by highlighting mediational pathways and gender differences. Intervention research is needed to determine if teaching undergraduate students more adaptive ways of using SNS or reducing exposure to SNS reduces body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in this high-risk population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2016.0384

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, M., Maras, D., & Goldfield, G. S.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Goldfield, Gary S.
Venue
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
Published
2016-12
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
709-715
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2562491996
Cited by
65
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
social networking sites, excessive social media use, disordered eating, dietary restraint, emotional eating, body image, body dissatisfaction, undergraduate students, gender differences, mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Body Weight, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Students, Thinness, Time Factors, Young Adult, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review