Cited by 34Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Coverage for Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Nonintensive Therapies: An Evidence-Based Approach to Policymaking

Open access
Aleppo, Grazia, Hirsch, Irl B., Parkin, Christopher G., McGill, Janet, Galindo, Rodolfo, Kruger, Davida F., Levy, Carol J., Forlenza, Gregory P. +3 more·2023·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated the clinical benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are treated with intensive insulin regimens. Based on this evidence, CGM is now a standard of care for individuals within these diabetes populations and widely covered by commercial and public insurers. Moreover, recent clinical guidelines from the American Diabetes Association and American Association of Clinical Endocrinology now endorse CGM use in individuals treated with nonintensive insulin regimens. However, despite increasing evidence supporting CGM use for individuals treated with less-intensive insulin therapy or noninsulin medications, insurance coverage is limited or nonexistent. This narrative review reports key findings from recent randomized, observational, and retrospective studies investigating use of CGM in T2D individuals treated with basal insulin only and/or noninsulin therapies and presents an evidence-based rationale for expanding access to CGM within this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2023.0268

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th ed. Brussels, International Diabetes Federation, 2021. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition [Last accessed: January 31, 2023].
  2. [38]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Type 2 diabetes in adults: Management (NG28). Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28 [Last accessed: November 26, 2022]. 32023018
  3. [49]Welsh J, Grace T. Rapid HbA1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes in a community setting following initiation of real-time continuous glucose monitoring. In: The Official Journal of ATTD Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes Conference 22–25 February 2023, Berlin & Online. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25(Suppl 2): EP149 /#323.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aleppo, G., Hirsch, I. B., Parkin, C. G., McGill, J., Galindo, R., Kruger, D. F., Levy, C. J., Forlenza, G. P., Umpierrez, G. E., Grunberger, G., & Bergenstal, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • CGParkin Communications, Inc., Henderson, Nevada, USA.
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • Grady Memorial Hospital (US)
  • Grunberger Diabetes Institute (US)
  • Park Nicollet Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Parkin, Christopher G.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2023-10
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
741-751
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W4384818544
Cited by
34
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Emory University
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  • Northwestern University
  • Insulet Corporation
  • MannKind Corporation
  • Dexcom
  • Nevro
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Roche Diabetes Care
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002378)
  • Abbott Diabetes Care
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK123384-3, K23DK123384, P30DK111024)
  • National Center for Research Resources
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, type 2 diabetes, insurance coverage, health policy, basal insulin, diabetes technology access, evidence-based policy
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Retrospective Studies, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Insulin, Regular, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review