Cited by 115Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Use of Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring Is Associated With A1C Reduction in People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin or Noninsulin Therapy

Open access
Wright, Eugene E., Kerr, Matthew S.D., Reyes, Ignacio J., Nabutovsky, Yelena, Miller, Eden·2021·Diabetes Spectrum

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glycemic control is suboptimal in many individuals with type 2 diabetes. Although use of flash continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has demonstrated A1C reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a multiple daily injection or insulin pump therapy regimen, the glycemic benefit of this technology in patients with type 2 diabetes using nonintensive treatment regimens has not been well studied. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study used the IBM Explorys database to assess changes in A1C after flash CGM prescription in a large population with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes treated with nonintensive therapy. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, age <65 years, treatment with basal insulin or noninsulin therapy, naive to any CGM, baseline A1C ≥8%, and a prescription for the FreeStyle Libre flash CGM system during the period between October 2017 and February 2020. Patients served as their own control subject. RESULTS: A total of 1,034 adults with type 2 diabetes (mean age 51.6 ± 9.2 years, 50.9% male, baseline A1C 10.1 ± 1.7%) were assessed. More patients received noninsulin treatments (n = 728) than basal insulin therapy (n = 306). We observed a significant reduction in A1C within the full cohort: from 10.1 ± 1.7 to 8.6 ± 1.8%; Δ −1.5 ± 2.2% (P <0.001). The largest reductions were seen in patients with a baseline A1C ≥12.0% (n = 181, A1C reduction −3.7%, P <0.001). Significant reductions were seen in both treatment groups (basal insulin −1.1%, noninsulin −1.6%, both P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Prescription of the flash CGM system was associated with significant reductions in A1C in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin or noninsulin therapy. These findings provide evidence for expanding access to flash CGM within the broader population of people with type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/ds20-0069

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adults with type 2 diabetes (both using and not using insulin), continuous glucose monitoring achieves improved glycated haemoglobin concentrations without impacting the rate of hypoglycaemia.

    “Continuous glucose monitoring for adults with type 2 diabetes (both those using and not using insulin)24,25 also achieves improved glycated haemoglobin concentrations without impacting the rate of hypoglycaemia.”

    From Blood glucose monitoring devices: current considerations (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results (Outcomes; page not provided) report lower A1C after flash CGM prescription in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving basal insulin or noninsulin therapy. The Methods (Outcomes; page not provided) list A1C outcomes but no hypoglycemia-rate outcome, so the claim that hypoglycemia rates were unaffected is unsupported. The observational study also establishes an association after prescription, not that CGM caused the improvement. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Wright et al. 2021, adults with T2DM receiving noninsulin therapies or basal insulin had a significant HbA1c reduction from 10.1 ± 1.7 to 8.6 ± 1.8% (difference −1.5 ± 2.2%, p < 0.001) 6 months after FSL initiation; the noninsulin therapy group had a mean HbA1c reduction of 1.6% (p < 0.001).

    “Wright et al. reported a significant HbA1c reduction from 10.1 ± 1.7 to 8.6 ± 1.8% (difference −1.5 ± 2.2%, p < 0.001) 6 months after initiation of FSL. The noninsulin therapy group had a mean HbA1c reduction of 1.6% (p < 0.001).”
  • In adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin or noninsulin therapy, intermittently scanned CGM improves A1C levels.

    “Furthermore, retrospective observational data in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with either basal insulin or noninsulin therapy have shown an improvement in A1C levels (85).”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [85]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, E. E., Kerr, M. S. D., Reyes, I. J., Nabutovsky, Y., & Miller, E.
Affiliations
  • Charlotte Area Health Education Center, Charlotte, NC
  • Abbott (United States) (US)
  • Diabetes Nation, Sisters, OR
Corresponding author
Wright, Eugene E.
Venue
Diabetes Spectrum
Published
2021-02-10
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
184-189
ISSN
  • 1040-9165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7353
OpenAlex
W3128076258
Cited by
115
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12
FWCI
15.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Spectrum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Abbott Diabetes Care
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c reduction, basal insulin, FreeStyle Libre, suboptimal glycemic control, HbA1c

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review