Cited by 26Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Effect of Thyroid Function Variations Within the Laboratory Reference Range on Health Status, Mood, and Cognition in Levothyroxine-Treated Subjects

Open access
Samuels, Mary H., Kolobova, Irina, Smeraglio, Anne, Niederhausen, Meike, Janowsky, Jeri S., Schuff, Kathryn G.·2016·Thyroid®

Abstract

Background: There has been recent debate within the thyroid field regarding whether current upper limits of the thyrotropin (TSH) reference range should be lowered. This debate can be better informed by investigation of whether variations in thyroid function within the reference range have clinical effects. One important target organ for thyroid hormone is the brain, but little is known about variations in neurocognitive measures within the reference range for thyroid function. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 132 otherwise healthy hypothyroid subjects receiving chronic replacement therapy with levothyroxine (LT4) who had TSH levels across the full span of the laboratory reference range (0.34–5.6 mU/L). Subjects underwent detailed tests of health status, mood, and cognitive function, with an emphasis on memory and executive functions. Results: Subjects with low-normal (≤2.5 mU/L) and high-normal (>2.5 mU/L) TSH levels did not differ on most tests of health status, mood, or cognitive function, and there were no correlations between TSH, free T4, or free T3 levels and most outcomes. There was, however, a suggestion that thyroid function affected performance on the Iowa Gambling Task, which mimics real life decision-making. Subjects with low-normal TSH levels made more advantageous decisions than those with high-normal TSH levels. Conclusions: Variations in thyroid function within the laboratory reference range do not appear to have clinically relevant effects on health status, mood, or memory in LT4 treated subjects. However, decision making, which encompasses many executive functions, may be affected. Unless further studies strengthen this finding, these data do not support narrowing the TSH reference range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.2016.0141

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hypothyroid patients treated with levothyroxine monotherapy tend to have lower serum T3 concentrations and higher T4 levels than healthy people.

    “Hypothyroid patients treated with levothyroxine monotherapy tend to have lower serum T3 concentrations and higher T4 levels than healthy people. 42,50”

    From Use of liothyronine (T3) in hypothyroidism: Joint British Thyroid Association/Society for endocrinology consensus statement (2023) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Results (page unavailable) report low free T3 in 70 of 132 levothyroxine-treated subjects, supporting the low-T3 portion of the claim. The study compares treated subjects by TSH level, not with healthy people, and reports no finding that their T4 levels are higher than healthy people's. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [35]Spreen O, Strauss EA. 1998. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 612–616 [Google Scholar]
  2. [36]Spreen O, Strauss EA. 1998. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 644–646 [Google Scholar]
  3. [37]Harvey PD, Greenberg BR, Serper MR. 1989. The affective lability scales: development, reliability, and validity. J Clin Psychol 45:786–793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [38]Lezak M, Howieson DB, Loring DW. 1995. Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 444–450 [Google Scholar]
  5. [40]Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. 1995. Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 371–374 [Google Scholar]
  6. [42]Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. 1995. Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 363–364 [Google Scholar]
  7. [43]Spreen O, Strauss EA. 1998. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 208–212 [Google Scholar]
  8. [45]Spreen O, Strauss E. 1998. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms and Commentary. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1042–1043 [Google Scholar]
  9. [47]R Core Team 2015 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: Available at: www.R-project.org/ (accessed February1, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. [49]Højsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J. 2006. The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw 15:1–11 [Google Scholar]
  11. [54]Samuels MH, Kolobova I, Smeraglio A, Peters D, Janowsky JS, Schuff KG. 2014. The effects of levothyroxine replacement or suppressive therapy on health status, mood and cognition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:843–851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samuels, M. H., Kolobova, I., Smeraglio, A., Niederhausen, M., Janowsky, J. S., & Schuff, K. G.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Saturday Academy (US)
Corresponding author
Samuels, Mary H.
Venue
Thyroid®
Published
2016-09
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1173-1184
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W2485397563
Cited by
26
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thyroid (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK075496)
  • National Center for Research Resources (K01RR024120)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
TSH reference range, levothyroxine, hypothyroidism, thyroid function, cognitive function, memory, executive function, mood, health status, Iowa Gambling Task, decision-making, free thyroxine, free T3
MeSH terms
Affect, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Values, Thyroid Function Tests, Thyroid Gland, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Triiodothyronine, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review