Cited by 81

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eps15 Homology Domain 1-associated Tubules Contain Phosphatidylinositol-4-Phosphate and Phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-Bisphosphate and Are Required for Efficient Recycling

Jović, Marko, Kieken, Fabien, Naslavsky, Naava, Sorgen, Paul L., Caplan, Steve·2009·Molecular Biology of the Cell

Abstract

The C-terminal Eps15 homology domain (EHD) 1/receptor-mediated endocytosis-1 protein regulates recycling of proteins and lipids from the recycling compartment to the plasma membrane. Recent studies have provided insight into the mode by which EHD1-associated tubular membranes are generated and the mechanisms by which EHD1 functions. Despite these advances, the physiological function of these striking EHD1-associated tubular membranes remains unknown. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy demonstrated that the Eps15 homology (EH) domain of EHD1 binds to phosphoinositides, including phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate. Herein, we identify phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate as an essential component of EHD1-associated tubules in vivo. Indeed, an EHD1 EH domain mutant (K483E) that associates exclusively with punctate membranes displayed decreased binding to phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate and other phosphoinositides. Moreover, we provide evidence that although the tubular membranes to which EHD1 associates may be stabilized and/or enhanced by EHD1 expression, these membranes are, at least in part, pre-existing structures. Finally, to underscore the function of EHD1-containing tubules in vivo, we used a small interfering RNA (siRNA)/rescue assay. On transfection, wild-type, tubule-associated, siRNA-resistant EHD1 rescued transferrin and β1 integrin recycling defects observed in EHD1-depleted cells, whereas expression of the EHD1 K483E mutant did not. We propose that phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate is an essential component of EHD1-associated tubules that also contain phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate and that these structures are required for efficient recycling to the plasma membrane.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1091/mbc.e08-11-1102

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1091/mbc.e04-07-0578 · DOI
  2. Blagoveshchenskaya A., 2008, J. Cell Biol, 180, 803, 10.1083/jcb.200708109 · DOI
  3. Blume J. J., 2007, Exp. Cell Res, 313, 219, 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.10.006 · DOI
  4. 10.1091/mbc.e05-01-0076 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brown F. D., 2001, J. Cell Biol, 154, 1007, 10.1083/jcb.200103107 · DOI
  6. Caplan S., 2002, EMBO J, 21, 2557, 10.1093/emboj/21.11.2557 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Conner S. D., 2003, Nature, 422, 37, 10.1038/nature01451 · DOI
  8. Daumke O., 2007, Nature, 449, 923, 10.1038/nature06173 · DOI · Paper page
  9. de Beer T., 1998, Science, 281, 1357, 10.1126/science.281.5381.1357 · DOI
  10. 10.1091/mbc.e03-12-0862 · DOI
  11. Delaglio F., 1995, J. Biomol. NMR, 6, 277, 10.1007/BF00197809 · DOI
  12. De Matteis M. A., 2005, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1744, 396, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.04.013 · DOI
  13. Duffy H. S., 2002, J. Biol. Chem, 277, 36706, 10.1074/jbc.M207016200 · DOI
  14. Farsad K., 2001, J. Cell Biol, 155, 193, 10.1083/jcb.200107075 · DOI
  15. George M., 2007, BMC Cell Biol, 8, 3, 10.1186/1471-2121-8-3 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Grant B. D., 2008, Traffic, 9, 2043, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00834.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Grant B., 2001, Nat. Cell Biol, 3, 573, 10.1038/35078549 · DOI
  18. Gruenberg J., 1995, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol, 7, 552, 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80013-1 · DOI
  19. Guilherme A., 2004, J. Biol. Chem, 279, 40062, 10.1074/jbc.M401918200 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hales C. M., 2001, J. Biol. Chem, 276, 39067, 10.1074/jbc.M104831200 · DOI
  21. Hinshaw J. E., 1995, Nature, 374, 190, 10.1038/374190a0 · DOI
  22. Honda A., 1999, Cell, 99, 521, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81540-8 · DOI
  23. Itoh T., 2006, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1761, 897, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Johnson B. A., 1994, J. Biomol. NMR, 4, 603, 10.1007/BF00404272 · DOI
  25. Jovic M., 2007, J. Cell Sci, 120, 802, 10.1242/jcs.03383 · DOI
  26. Kieken F., 2007, J. Biomol. NMR, 39, 323, 10.1007/s10858-007-9196-0 · DOI
  27. Lee D. W., 2005, J. Biol. Chem, 280, 280
  28. Lin S. X., 2001, Nat. Cell Biol, 3, 567, 10.1038/35078543 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Maehama T., 1998, J. Biol. Chem, 273, 13375, 10.1074/jbc.273.22.13375 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Malecz N., 2000, Curr. Biol, 10, 1383, 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00778-8 · DOI
  31. Maxfield F. R., 2004, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 5, 121, 10.1038/nrm1315 · DOI · Paper page
  32. McMahon H. T., 2005, Nature, 438, 590, 10.1038/nature04396 · DOI
  33. McPherson P. S., 1996, Nature, 379, 353, 10.1038/379353a0 · DOI
  34. 10.1091/mbc.e03-10-0733 · DOI
  35. Naslavsky N., 2005, J. Cell Sci, 118, 4093, 10.1242/jcs.02595 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Naslavsky N., 2007, J. Biol. Chem, 282, 16612, 10.1074/jbc.M609493200 · DOI
  37. 10.1091/mbc.e05-05-0466 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Nemoto Y., 1997, J. Biol. Chem, 272, 30817, 10.1074/jbc.272.49.30817 · DOI
  39. Picciano J. A., 2003, Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol, 285, C1009, 10.1152/ajpcell.00140.2003 · DOI
  40. 10.1091/mbc.e07-08-0841 · DOI
  41. Rapaport D., 2006, Traffic, 7, 52, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00359.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1091/mbc.e07-02-0169 · DOI
  43. Sharma M., 2008, Traffic, 9, 995, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00732.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. Sheff D. R., 1999, J. Cell Biol, 145, 123, 10.1083/jcb.145.1.123 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Shi A., 2007, Curr. Biol, 17, 1913, 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.045 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Shinozaki-Narikawa N., 2006, Traffic, 7, 1539, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00480.x · DOI
  47. Sonnichsen B., 2000, J. Cell Biol, 149, 901, 10.1083/jcb.149.4.901 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Suchy S. F., 1995, Hum. Mol. Genet, 4, 2245, 10.1093/hmg/4.12.2245 · DOI
  49. Ullrich O., 1996, J. Cell Biol, 135, 913, 10.1083/jcb.135.4.913 · DOI · Paper page
  50. van der Sluijs P., 1992, Cell, 70, 729, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90307-X · DOI
  51. Xu Y., 2004, Mol. Membr. Biol, 21, 269, 10.1080/09687680410001716871 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Zimmerberg J., 2006, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 7, 9, 10.1038/nrm1784 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jović, M., Kieken, F., Naslavsky, N., Sorgen, P. L., & Caplan, S.
Affiliations
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Eppley Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5870
Venue
Molecular Biology of the Cell
Published
2009-06
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
2731-2743
ISSN
  • 1059-1524
  • 1939-4586
Cited by
81
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review