Cited by 599Embodied and Extended CognitionCognitive Science and Education ResearchPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The Continuity of Mind

Open access
Spivey, Michael·2006·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

The cognitive and neural sciences have been on the brink of a paradigm shift for over a decade. This book is intended to help galvanize the forces of dynamical systems theory, cognitive and computational neuroscience, connectionism, and ecological psychology that are needed to complete this paradigm shift. The book lays bare the fact that comprehending a spoken sentence, understanding a visual scene, or just thinking about the day's events involves the serial coalescing of different neuronal activation patterns, i.e., a state-space trajectory that flirts with a series of point attractors. As a result, the brain cannot help but spend most of its time instantiating patterns of activity that are in between identifiable mental states rather than in them. The chapters are arranged to present a systematic overview of how perception, cognition, and action are partially overlapping segments of one continuous mental flow, rather than three distinct mental systems. The early chapters provide experiential demonstrations of the gray areas in mental activity that happen in between discretely labeled mental events, as well as geometric visualizations of attractors in state space that make the dynamical-systems framework seem less mathematically abstract. The middle chapters present scores of behavioral and neurophysiological studies that portray the continuous temporal dynamics inherent in categorization, language comprehension, visual perception, as well as attention, action, and reasoning. The final chapters conclude with discussions of what the mind itself must look like if its activity is continuous in time and its contents are distributed in state space.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195170788.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Every category implemented in any human brain is an ad hoc event: its features of equivalence are always constructed in a particular individual for a particular function in a particular situation.

    “By implication, every category implemented in any human brain is an ad hoc event 139,145-147 : its features of equivalence are always constructed in a particular individual for a particular function in a particular situation.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spivey, M.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Spivey, Michael
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2006-12-21
Volume
25
Issue
25
OpenAlex
W2127151274
Cited by
599
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 41
FWCI
5.99
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
dynamical systems theory, state trajectories, attractors, connectionism, ecological psychology, cognitive neuroscience, language comprehension, visual perception, categorization, attention, reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review