Cited by 104Opinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceChaos, Complexity, and EducationComplex Systems and Dynamics

Complex Dynamical Systems in Social and Personality Psychology: Theory, Modeling, and Analysis

Richardson, Michael J., Dale, Rick, Marsh, Kerry L.·2014·Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511996481.015

Cites

173 of 173 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In dynamic systems framework, prediction is not the outcome of internal model selection but a natural consequence of temporally structured dynamics, without requiring explicit Bayesian updating.

    “Prediction, in this framework, is not the outcome of internal model selection but a natural consequence of temporally structured dynamics—where the system’s history and current state constrain its future evolution, without requiring explicit Bayesian updating (Schmidt and Richardson 2008; Richardson et al. 2014).”

    From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Richardson et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 174 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, M. J., Dale, R., & Marsh, K. L.
Venue
Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology
Published
2014-02-24
Pages
253-282
OpenAlex
W2475480073
Cited by
104
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.81
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
Keywords
complex dynamical systems, social psychology, personality psychology, nonlinear dynamics, chaos theory, self-regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review