The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief
Abstract
In this book Zagzebski gives an extended argument that the self-reflective person is committed to belief on authority. Epistemic authority is compatible with autonomy, but epistemic self-reliance is incoherent. She argues that epistemic and emotional self-trust are rational and inescapable, that consistent self-trust commits us to trust in others, and that among those we are committed to trusting are some whom we ought to treat as epistemic authorities, modeled on the well-known principles of authority of Joseph Raz. These principles apply to authority in the moral and religious domains.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“epistemic expertise requires a relation with understanding that AI systems do not satisfy and intellectual abilities that these systems do not manifest.”
From Experts or Authorities? The Strange Case of the Presumed Epistemic Superiority of Artificial Intelligence Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Zagzebski, 2012
In the citing paper
“Expertise may involve a more distant or impersonal relationship, while authority requires a closer one.”
From Experts or Authorities? The Strange Case of the Presumed Epistemic Superiority of Artificial Intelligence Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Zagzebski, 2012
In the citing paper
“as some philosophers have argued, self-trust in one's own capacities, together with the conscientious employment of these capacities, is an essential precondition for having justified beliefs and knowledge in the first place (Zagzebski, 2012 ; Dormandy, 2020 ).”
From The Epistemic Cost of Opacity: How the Use of Artificial Intelligence Undermines the Knowledge of Medical Doctors in High-Stakes Contexts (2025) · cites this paper as Zagzebski, 2012
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Zagzebski 2012
In the citing paper
“The second is that self-trust is nevertheless defeasible.”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Zagzebski 2012
In the citing paper
“There is nothing epistemically problematic in preferring the deliverances of someone else ' s cognitive faculties over one ' s own on particular topics or in well-circumscribed areas (Zagzebski 2012, Ch. 1).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Zagzebski 2012
In the citing paper
“The fi rst is that it is default rational to have self-trust concerning one ' s own cognitive faculties and judgments.”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Zagzebski 2012
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 489
Epistemic and deontic authority in theargumentum ad verecundiam
Koszowy, M., & Walton, D. (2019) · Pragmatics and Society · doi:10.1075/ps.16051.kos · Cited by 11
The Virtue Epistemology of Maria Montessori
Frierson, P. R. (2015) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2015.1036895 · Cited by 11
A defense of the very idea of moral deference pessimism
Lewis, M. (2019) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01312-1 · Cited by 11
For A Service Conception of Epistemic Authority: A Collective Approach
Croce, M. (2019) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1577511 · Cited by 27
Bordignon, F. (2023) · Journal of Contemporary European Studies · doi:10.1080/14782804.2023.2177838 · Cited by 10
Missier, C. A. (2025) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel16010073 · Cited by 10
Moral Experts, Deference & Disagreement
Matheson, J., McElreath, S., & Nobis, N. (2018) · Philosophy and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92759-6_5 · Cited by 10
Social Exclusion, Epistemic Injustice, and Intellectual Self-Trust
Leefmann, J. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.2004620 · Cited by 10
Bhojani, A.-R., & Clarke, M. (2023) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417522000470 · Cited by 10
Epistemic Injustice in the Political Domain: Powerless Citizens and Institutional Reform
Liveriero, F. (2020) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-020-10097-w · Cited by 14
Epistemology and the Pandemic: Lessons from an Epistemic Crisis
Špecián, P. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.2009931 · Cited by 10
Challenging Authority with Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Arguments from and to Authority
Lewiński, M. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7030207 · Cited by 11
Authority or autonomy? Philosophical and psychological perspectives on deference to experts
Worsnip, A., Lane, D., Pratt, S., Napolitano, M. G., Gray, K. J., & Greene, J. A. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2475138 · Cited by 10
Marková, I. S. (2025) · Cultures of Science · doi:10.1177/20966083251324673 · Cited by 9
Rivas, C. A., Sohanpal, R., MacNeill, V., Steed, L., Edwards, E. A., Antao, L., Griffiths, C., Eldridge, S. M., Taylor, S. J., & Walton, R. T. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015664 · Cited by 9
Social Epistemic Normativity: The Program
Goldberg, S. C. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2019.54 · Cited by 9
Moral hinges and steadfastness
Ranalli, C. (2021) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12499 · Cited by 9
Muñoz, D. D. (2018) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzy043 · Cited by 9
de Ridder, J., & The Society of Christian Philosophers (2019) · Faith and Philosophy · doi:10.5840/faithphil201951123 · Cited by 9
Lange, B. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01377-4_9 · Cited by 9
AI Epistemic Disengagement and Consumer Dependence: An Augmentation‐Substitution Framework
Theoharakis, V., & Mylonopoulos, N. A. (2026) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.70136 · Cited by 8
Testimony, evidence and interpersonal reasons
Leonard, N. (2016) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0611-1 · Cited by 8
The Epistemology of Disagreement: Why Not Bayesianism?
Mulligan, T. (2019) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2019.28 · Cited by 8
Trust as a Test for Unethical Persuasive Design
Brennan, J. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00431-6 · Cited by 8
Misplaced Trust in Expertise: Pseudo-Experts and Unreliable Experts
Croce, M., & Marsili, N. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2491104 · Cited by 7
Du, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2732250 · Cited by 11
Linguistic Understanding and Testimonial Warrant
Pollock, J. (2021) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-020-00362-w · Cited by 7
Ward, P., Lunnay, B., Foley, K. M., Meyer, S. B., Thomas, J. A., Olver, I., & Miller, E. R. (2021) · International Journal of Social Quality · doi:10.3167/ijsq.2021.11010217 · Cited by 7
Our Epistemic Duties in Scenarios of Vaccine Mistrust
Terzian, G., & Corbalán, M. I. (2021) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2021.1997399 · Cited by 7
Commentary, Authority, and the Care of the Self
Futter, D. B. (2016) · Philosophy and Rhetoric · doi:10.5325/philrhet.49.1.0098 · Cited by 7
Hirvonen, N., Multas, A., Nygård, T., & Huotari, M. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24942 · Cited by 14
Expert Authority and Its Assessment
Keren, A. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2472780 · Cited by 6
Contessa, G. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009625326 · Cited by 6
Testimonial knowledge and content preservation
Pollock, J. (2023) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-023-02030-5 · Cited by 6
Deferring to Expertise whilst Maintaining Autonomy
Brown, R. C. H. (2024) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.3 · Cited by 6
The Philosophy of Epistemic Autonomy: Introduction to Special Issue
Matheson, J. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2335623 · Cited by 6
Deferring to Experts and Thinking for Oneself
Grundmann, T. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2449605 · Cited by 6
Knowing, Unknowing, and Re-knowing
Hoeyer, K., & Winthereik, B. R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_11 · Cited by 6
Why Won’t You Listen To Me? Predictive Neurotechnology and Epistemic Authority
Tacca, A., & Gilbert, F. (2023) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-023-09527-0 · Cited by 6
Rollins, J. (2015) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12184 · Cited by 6
The Special Value of Epistemic Self‐Reliance
Byerly, T. R. (2013) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/rati.12016 · Cited by 6
How Aristotelians Can Make Faith a Virtue
Jeffrey, A. (2016) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-016-9756-z · Cited by 6
Caveat Auditor : Epistemic Trust and Conflicts of Interest
McBrayer, J. P. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2078250 · Cited by 7
Obedience and Believing a Person
McMyler, B. (2015) · Philosophical Investigations · doi:10.1111/phin.12087 · Cited by 6
Hope, Hate and Indignation: Spinoza and Political Emotion in the Trump Era
Tucker, E. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74427-8_8 · Cited by 6
A comparison between North and South business ethics: the concepts of Renzhi and Fazhi in China
Rawwas, M. Y. A., Wang, Y., Zhao, B., & Javed, B. (2018) · Asia Pacific Business Review · doi:10.1080/13602381.2018.1495381 · Cited by 6
Skilful reflection as a master virtue
Mi, C., & Ryan, S. (2016) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1192-z · Cited by 6
AI and the Philosophy of Expertise and Epistemic Authority
Hauswald, R. (2025) · A Companion to Applied Philosophy of AI · doi:10.1002/9781394238651.ch5 · Cited by 5
A Philosophy of the Humanities
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.001.0001 · Cited by 5
The Apt Curation Model: An Epistemic Virtue Theory of AI-Assisted Authorship
Rodrigues, T. V. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01038-z · Cited by 11
Virtue environmentalism: towards a robustly social virtue epistemology
Jarczewski, D. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05168-3 · Cited by 5
Exploring the moral exemplarity of Greta Thunberg
Mansikka‐aho, A., Varpanen, J., Lahikainen, L., & Pulkki, J. M. (2023) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2023.2248404 · Cited by 5
Should we worry about conspiracy theorists rejecting experts?
Tsapos, M. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2375774 · Cited by 5
Maile, A. J. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2379987 · Cited by 8
HOW TO INSULT AND COMPLIMENT A TESTIFIER
Malcolm, F. (2016) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2016.39 · Cited by 5
Inevitable ignorance as a standard for excusability: an epistemological analysis
Ciuni, R., & Tuzet, G. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02388-2 · Cited by 5
WHAT IT TAKES TO LIVE PHILOSOPHICALLY: OR, HOW TO PROGRESS IN THE ART OF LIVING
Cohoe, C. M., & Grimm, S. R. (2020) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12420 · Cited by 4
Moderation and authority-building process: the dynamics of knowledge creation on history subreddits
de Andrade, D. L., & Filho, D. V. (2022) · Internet Histories · doi:10.1080/24701475.2022.2110564 · Cited by 5
The problems of authority and the want of apprenticeship in soldiers’ character development
Berghaus, P. T. (2016) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2016.1204272 · Cited by 5
Lis, A., Kama, K., & Reins, L. (2019) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scz025 · Cited by 5
The Epistemology of Collective Testimony
Townsend, L. (2020) · Journal of Social Ontology · doi:10.1515/jso-2019-0044 · Cited by 5
Toxic Positivity and Epistemic Injustice
de Rijk, S. J. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2025.7 · Cited by 4
Language as Power in the Language Teacher Education Ecosystem
Kamali, J. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009733823 · Cited by 5
Experiential Knowledge in Mental Health Care: A Coherent Concept?
Dings, R., & Strijbos, D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.003.0014 · Cited by 4
Mitova, V. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02406-9 · Cited by 4
Isern‐Mas, C., & Almagro, M. (2025) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-025-09730-5 · Cited by 4
‘Trusting-to’ and ‘Trusting-as’: A qualitative account of trustworthiness
Kelsall, J. (2022) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2022.2075456 · Cited by 4
The Pitfalls of Epistemic Autonomy without Intellectual Humility
Beebe, J. R. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2342870 · Cited by 8
Might Technology Undermine First-Person Authority?
Doyle, C. (2024) · Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Scientific Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00876-7 · Cited by 4
Tools for Teaching and Role-Modeling Critical Thinking
Wagner, P. A. (2022) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2022.138086 · Cited by 4
Lovrits, V. (2024) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2024.2321394 · Cited by 4
Folk-economic beliefs as “evidential fiction”: Putting the economic public discourse back on track
Acerbi, A., & Sacco, P. L. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x18000250 · Cited by 4
Testimony, faith, and humility
Malcolm, F. (2020) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412519000738 · Cited by 4
Justified epistemic authority (in legal interpretation)
Spaić, B. (2018) · Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu · doi:10.5937/analipfb1804143s · Cited by 4
Making Sense of Epistemic Authority
Jarczewski, D. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2566132 · Cited by 3
The Ethics and Epistemology of Clinician-AI Disagreement in Medicine: Beyond Opposition
Pozzi, G., Sand, M., & Jongsma, K. R. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2632008 · Cited by 3
Zhao, Y., & Hu, Z. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04497-z · Cited by 3
Expert Panels in Evaluation: An Update From the Field Using the DATA Model
Cameron, B. T., & Hynes, C. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation · doi:10.3138/cjpe-2023-0047 · Cited by 3
Epistemic Environmentalism and Autonomy: The Case of Conceptual Engineering
Kitsik, E. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2024.42 · Cited by 3
Testimonial Authority and Knowledge Transmission
Jäger, C., & Shackel, N. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2449608 · Cited by 3
COMMENTS ON “WHAT THE INTERNALIST SHOULD SAY TO THE TORTOISE”
Wright, S. (2015) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2015.15 · Cited by 3
The Transmission of Understanding
Green, A. (2018) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.1743 · Cited by 3
Sham Epistemic Authority and Implicit Racial Bias
Lassiter, C. (2019) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1552995 · Cited by 3
Everybody else is thinking it, so why can’t we?
McBrayer, J. P. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02850-6 · Cited by 3
Epistemic Democracy and Technopolitics
Marrone, P. (2022) · International Journal of Technoethics · doi:10.4018/ijt.291551 · Cited by 3
Watson, J. C., & Guidry-Grimes, L. K. (2018) · Philosophy and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92759-6_1 · Cited by 3
Testimony, Understanding, and Art Criticism
Hazlett, A. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191815423.003.0012 · Cited by 3
Whither philosophy of religion?
Leftow, B., Anderson, P. S., & Schellenberg, J. L. (2015) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412515000347 · Cited by 3
Citizenry incompetence and the epistemic structure of society
Brasi, L. D. (2018) · Filosofia Unisinos · doi:10.4013/fsu.2018.193.03 · Cited by 3
Rutledge, J. C., & The Society of Christian Philosophers (2019) · Faith and Philosophy · doi:10.5840/faithphil2019430121 · Cited by 3
Scriptures and the Guidance of Language
Smith, S. G. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108580441 · Cited by 4
Exemplarist Moral Theory: Recent Developments and Replies to Objections
Zagzebski, L. T. (2025) · The Journal of Value Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s10790-025-10037-w · Cited by 2
Self-citationThe Development of Gilbert Ryle’s Conception of Knowledge
Kremer, M. J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.003.0005 · Cited by 2
Cabral, M. (2025) · Zygon® · doi:10.16995/zygon.20050 · Cited by 2
Malcolm, F. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05117-0 · Cited by 2
Callahan, L. F., & Rea, M. C. (2025) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.70013 · Cited by 2
Divine Hiddenness and Evidence for God
Anderson, C. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198973041.001.0001 · Cited by 2
The Keystone Loop, Self-Trust, and Epistemic Reparations to Oneself
Wright, S. J. (2025) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96041-3_7 · Cited by 2
Spours, K. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13110944 · Cited by 3
For Real?—Epistemic Trust Within Online Environments and the Lures of Conspiracy Thinking
Schmidt-Boddy, P., Vespermann, D., Melichar, H. G., & Fuchs, T. (2026) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/s10746-025-09830-0 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Zagzebski, L. T.
- Corresponding author
- Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-11-07
- OpenAlex
- W4210369994
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 14.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic authority, epistemic autonomy, self-reflection, Joseph Raz, epistemic trust, epistemic rationality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
