Cited by 848Nutrition, Health, and Society StudiesNutritional Studies and DietConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

A global review of food-based dietary guidelines

Open access
Herforth, Anna, Arimond, Mary, Álvarez-Sánchez, Cristina, Coates, Jennifer, Christianson, Karin, Muehlhoff, Ellen·2019·Advances in Nutrition

Abstract

The objective of this review is to provide a concise, descriptive global review of current food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG), and to assess similarities and differences in key elements of a healthy diet articulated across countries. Information was sourced from the FBDG repository of the FAO, which catalogs FBDG for all countries where they are available, including a description of the food guide (the graphic representation of the dietary guidelines), a set of key messages, and downloadable documents provided by the countries. FBDG are currently available for 90 countries globally: 7 in Africa, 17 in Asia and the Pacific, 33 in Europe, 27 in Latin America and the Caribbean, 4 in the Near East, and 2 in North America. The year of publication of current versions ranges from 1986 to 2017 (mean 2009). This review provides summaries of the key messages and food guides that are used to communicate national dietary guidance, organized by food group, and evaluates the extent to which each set of FBDG includes existing recommendations articulated by the WHO. Some guidance appears nearly universally across countries: to consume a variety of foods; to consume some foods in higher proportion than others; to consume fruits and vegetables, legumes, and animal-source foods; and to limit sugar, fat, and salt. Guidelines on dairy, red meat, fats and oils, and nuts are more variable. Although WHO global guidance encourages consumption of nuts, whole grains, and healthy fats, these messages are not universally echoed across countries. Future frontiers in FBDG development include the incorporation of environmental sustainability and increased attention to sociocultural factors including rapidly changing dietary trends. Steps toward regional and global dietary recommendations could be helpful for refinement of country-level FBDG, and for clear communication and measurement of diet quality both nationally and globally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/advances/nmy130

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]Gonzalez Fischer C, Garnett T. Plates, Pyramids, Planet: Developments in National Healthy and Sustainable Dietary Guidelines: A State of Play Assessment. Rome: FAO University of Oxford; 2016.
  2. [19]FAO, WHO. Second International Conference on Nutrition; 2014 Nov 19–21; Rome. Conference Outcome Document: Framework for Action [Internet]. Rome,Italy: FAO, WHO[ citedNovember, 2018]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-mm215e.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herforth, A., Arimond, M., Álvarez-Sánchez, C., Coates, J., Christianson, K., & Muehlhoff, E.
Affiliations
  • Family Health International 360 (US)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Herforth, Anna
Venue
Advances in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
590-605
ISSN
  • 2156-5376 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8313
OpenAlex
W2942526895
Cited by
848
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 155 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 19 · 2013: 1
FWCI
67.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2019-07-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • UC Davis World Food Center
  • FAO Nutrition and Food Systems Division
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
food-based dietary guidelines, healthy eating, food guide, dietary recommendations, fruit and vegetable intake, Fabaceae, animal source foods, nuts, whole grains, healthy fats, dairy products, red meat
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Food, Humans, Global Health, Nutrition Policy, Recommended Dietary Allowances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review