Cited by 158Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesExercise and Physiological Responses

Effect of β-carotene on lymphocyte subpopulations in elderly humans: evidence for a dose-response relationship

Watson, RR, Prabhala, RH, Plezia, PM, Alberts, DS·1991·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

The effects of various doses (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 mg/d) of supplementary beta-carotene were evaluated. The percentage of lymphoid cells with surface markers for T-helper and natural killer (NK) cells and cells with interleukin 2 (IL-2) and transferrin receptors were significantly and substantially increased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from older human adult volunteers after supplementation with greater than or equal to 30 mg beta-carotene/d for 2 mo. The increase in the percentage of cells with markers of NK cells and in expression of IL-2 receptors was dose dependent. The plasma concentrations of beta-carotene were also elevated significantly; however, there was no increase in the amount of retinol present in plasma. This indicated that immunomodulation induced by beta-carotene may be due to the carotenoid rather than to an increased amount, and hence actions, of vitamin A. These results support the role of immunostimulation as a potential mechanism of action of beta-carotene with cancer-prevention potential.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/53.1.90

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, R., Prabhala, R., Plezia, P., & Alberts, D.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
90-94
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1910857921
Cited by
158
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (1991-04-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50aa008037-05, 5r01da004827-02)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA-08037)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 04827)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-25702)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
beta-carotene, lymphocyte subsets, natural killer cells, T helper cells, interleukin-2 receptor, transferrin receptor, dose-response relationship, immunomodulation, older adults, vitamin A, carotenoids, cancer prevention, dietary supplementation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Carotenoids, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer, Humans, Killer Cells, Natural, Male, Middle Aged, Receptors, Transferrin, Vitamin A, Receptors, Interleukin-2, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, beta Carotene, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review