Cited by 82Muscle metabolism and nutritionNutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Frailty amplifies the effects of aging on protein metabolism: role of protein intake

Open access
Chevalier, Stéphanie, Gougeon, Réjeanne, Nayar, Kiran, Morais, José A·2003·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background We previously showed that muscle contributes less to whole-body protein breakdown with healthy aging. Objective We hypothesized that frailty further compromises protein metabolism and that short-term protein supplementation improves protein status. Design Protein metabolism was studied with the oral, 60-h [(15)N]glycine and N(tau)-methylhistidine methods in 8 frail and 13 healthy elderly women during a 9-d isoenergetic, isonitrogenous formula diet and then after increased protein intakes in the frail women, to match the intakes of healthy subjects, for 12 d. Results Compared with healthy women, frail women had higher rates of whole-body protein synthesis and breakdown per kg fat-free mass and lower rates of muscle protein breakdown when expressed as total amounts per day but higher rates when expressed per kg muscle. Because muscle mass was lower in frail women, the contribution of muscle to whole-body protein breakdown was lower and that of nonmuscle lean tissues was higher. The protein-enriched diet had no effect on these variables but resulted in an increase in net endogenous protein balance and a positive nitrogen balance at the end of the diet period. Conclusions Frailty exacerbates age-related changes in protein metabolism by inducing an increase in muscle protein catabolism and a decrease in muscle mass. At low protein intakes, the increase in muscle catabolism may be a form of protection for both nonmuscle lean tissue mass and function at the expense of muscle mass. Frail women maintained the capacity to retain nitrogen after increased protein intakes, which could convey health benefits if sustained over a long enough period to result in lean tissue accretion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.422

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chevalier, S., Gougeon, R., Nayar, K., & Morais, J. A.
Affiliations
McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Morais, José A
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
422-429
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141461788
Cited by
82
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
frailty, aging, protein metabolism, protein intake, protein supplementation, muscle protein degradation, whole-body protein synthesis, nitrogen balance, lean body mass, older women
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Body Composition, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Muscle Proteins, Nitrogen, Proteins, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review