Cited by 160Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsNutritional Studies and DietCancer Risks and Factors

Risk factors for mortality in the Nurses’ Health Study: a competing risks analysis

Open access
Baer, Heather J., Glynn, Robert J., Hu, Frank B., Hankinson, Susan E., Willett, Walter C., Colditz, Graham A., Stampfer, Meir, Rosner, Bernard·2011·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Few studies have examined multiple risk factors for mortality or formally compared their associations across specific causes of death. The authors used competing risks survival analysis to evaluate associations of lifestyle and dietary factors with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among 50,112 participants in the Nurses' Health Study. There were 4,893 deaths between 1986 and 2004: 1,026 from cardiovascular disease, 931 from smoking-related cancers, 1,430 from cancers not related to smoking, and 1,506 from all other causes. Age, body mass index at age 18 years, weight change, height, current smoking and pack-years of smoking, glycemic load, cholesterol intake, systolic blood pressure and use of blood pressure medications, diabetes, parental myocardial infarction before age 60 years, and time since menopause were directly related to all-cause mortality, whereas there were inverse associations for physical activity and intakes of nuts, polyunsaturated fat, and cereal fiber. Moderate alcohol consumption was associated with decreased mortality. A model that incorporated differences in the associations of some risk factors with specific causes of death had a significantly better fit compared with a model in which all risk factors had common associations across all causes. In the future, this new model may be used to identify individuals at increased risk of mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwq368

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mechanisms through which hPDI could reduce CHD risk are likely shared with the mechanisms for type 2 diabetes risk reduction.

    “The mechanisms through which hPDI could reduce CHD risk are likely shared with the mechanisms for type 2 diabetes risk reduction.(2, 24–32)”
  • These dietary factors could aid in weight loss/maintenance, enhance glycemic control and insulin regulation, improve lipid profile, reduce blood pressure, improve vascular health, decrease inflammation, and foster more favorable diet-gut microbiome interactions, thereby lowering CHD risk.

    “all of which could aid in weight loss/maintenance, enhance glycemic control and insulin regulation, improve lipid profile, reduce blood pressure, improve vascular health, decrease inflammation, and foster more favorable diet- gut microbiome interactions (e.g. through lowered levels of trimethylamine N-oxide), thereby lowering CHD risk.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baer, H. J., Glynn, R. J., Hu, F. B., Hankinson, S. E., Willett, W. C., Colditz, G. A., Stampfer, M., & Rosner, B.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Baer, Heather J.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2010-12-06
Volume
173
Issue
3
Pages
319-329
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2103592177
Cited by
153
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P01CA087969, [P01 CA87969)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
mortality risk factors, competing risks, cause-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, lifestyle factors, dietary factors, cardiovascular mortality, tobacco-related cancer, body mass index, weight change, glycemic load, cholesterol intake, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, menopause, physical activity, nuts, polyunsaturated fat, cereal fiber, alcohol consumption, Nurses' Health Study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cause of Death, Chronic Disease, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Mortality, Nurses, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Smoking, United States, Health Behavior, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review