Cited by 607Nutritional Studies and DietAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactDietary Effects on Health

Vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality in Adventist Health Study 2

Open access
Orlich, Michael J., Singh, Pramil N, Sabaté, Joan, Jaceldo-Siegl, Karen, Fan, Jing, Knutsen, Synnove, Beeson, W. Lawrence, Fraser, Gary E.·2013·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Some evidence suggests vegetarian dietary patterns may be associated with reduced mortality, but the relationship is not well established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study; mortality analysis by Cox proportional hazards regression, controlling for important demographic and lifestyle confounders. SETTING: Adventist Health Study 2 (AHS-2), a large North American cohort. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 96,469 Seventh-day Adventist men and women recruited between 2002 and 2007, from which an analytic sample of 73,308 participants remained after exclusions. EXPOSURES: Diet was assessed at baseline by a quantitative food frequency questionnaire and categorized into 5 dietary patterns: nonvegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, lacto-ovo-vegetarian, and vegan. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The relationship between vegetarian dietary patterns and all-cause and cause-specific mortality; deaths through 2009 were identified from the National Death Index. RESULTS: There were 2570 deaths among 73,308 participants during a mean follow-up time of 5.79 years. The mortality rate was 6.05 (95% CI, 5.82-6.29) deaths per 1000 person-years. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality in all vegetarians combined vs nonvegetarians was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.97). The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality in vegans was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-1.01); in lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-1.00); in pesco-vegetarians, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69-0.94); and in semi-vegetarians, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.75-1.13) compared with nonvegetarians. Significant associations with vegetarian diets were detected for cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular noncancer mortality, renal mortality, and endocrine mortality. Associations in men were larger and more often significant than were those in women. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Vegetarian diets are associated with lower all-cause mortality and with some reductions in cause-specific mortality. Results appeared to be more robust in males. These favorable associations should be considered carefully by those offering dietary guidance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6473

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Rizzo NS Jaceldo-Siegl K Fraser GE Differences and similarities in dietary pattern and nutrient profiles between the sexes and blacks and whites: the Adventist Health Study 2 [abstract P077] Circulation 2012 125 10 suppl AP077 http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/meeting_abstract/125/10_MeetingAbstracts/AP077 Accessed December 1, 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orlich, M. J., Singh, P. N., Sabaté, J., Jaceldo-Siegl, K., Fan, J., Knutsen, S., Beeson, W. L., & Fraser, G. E.
Affiliations
Loma Linda University (US)
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2013-07-08
Volume
173
Issue
13
Pages
1230
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154622069
Cited by
607
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 6
FWCI
37.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U01CA152939)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
vegetarian diet, dietary habits, mortality, vegan diet, lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet, pesco-vegetarian diet, semi-vegetarian diet, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, renal mortality, Seventh-day Adventists, Adventist Health Study-2, sex differences, cause-specific mortality, lifestyle confounding, food frequency questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cause of Death, Diet, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, North America, Nutritional Status, Prospective Studies, Sampling Studies, Diet, Vegetarian, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Myocardial Ischemia, Protestantism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review