The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenomics to structure: evolutionary and clinical signals in the TP53 DNA-binding core through LOOCV-validated ensemble learning
Abstract
TP53 encodes a master tumor suppressor, and understanding its evolutionary constraints is critical for interpreting pathogenic variation. We developed a fully reproducible computational pipeline integrating evolutionary genomics, structural biology, and clinical variant analysis to systematically prioritize functionally critical residues in TP53. We used fixed effects likelihood and fast unconstrained Bayesian approximation to perform genome-wide alignment, maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation, and site-specific selection testing over 19 vertebrate orthologs. We mapped these evolutionary signals onto the AlphaFold-predicted structure and integrated 3936 human variants from ClinVar and UniProt. Selection analysis identified five sites under positive or diversifying selection, with a single consensus position detected by both methods: multiple-sequence-alignment position 606 (human codon 129) in the DNA-binding domain. Structural mapping revealed that pathogenic variants concentrate at the DNA-contacting interface, with residues 239–248 emerging as the highest-priority targets based on our composite scoring system that integrates evolutionary constraint, pathogenic burden, hotspot density, and domain importance. Machine learning validation under leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) demonstrated robust predictive performance. A Ridge–ExtraTrees ensemble achieved $\textrm{MAE (mean absolute error)}=2.84$, $\textrm{RMSE(root mean squared error)}=3.72$, $R^{2}=0.91$ for phylogenetic-distance regression and 89.5% accuracy (17/19) for clade classification. A multi-branch deep neural network attained comparable results ($\textrm{MAE}=2.33$, $\textrm{RMSE}=2.56$, $R^{2}=0.86$), while Random Forest substantially underperformed ($\textrm{MAE}\approx 7.19$, $\textrm{RMSE}\approx 8.82$, $R^{2}\approx 0.47$, accuracy $\approx 63\%$) due to shrinkage and class-imbalance bias. Our findings show that evolutionary signals and clinical variants converge within the structurally constrained DNA-binding core of TP53, with codon 129 representing a robust positive-selection site and residues 239–248 constituting the primary pathogenic hotspot. This AlphaFold-anchored, LOOCV-validated framework offers a systematic, generalizable approach for residue-level prioritization to guide mechanistic studies and potentially inform precision oncology applications pending experimental validation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
ClinVar: improvements to accessing data
Landrum, M. J., Chitipiralla, S., Brown, G. R., Chen, C., Gu, B., Hart, J., Hoffman, D., Jang, W., Kaur, K., Liu, C., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz972 · Cited by 994
Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data
Frazer, J., Notin, P., Dias, M., Gomez, A., Min, J. K., Brock, K., Gal, Y., & Marks, D. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · Cited by 791
Rentzsch, P., Schubach, M., Shendure, J., & Kircher, M. (2021) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-021-00835-9 · Cited by 640
Mutational processes shape the landscape of TP53 mutations in human cancer
Giacomelli, A. O., Yang, X., Lintner, R. E., McFarland, J. M., Duby, M., Kim, J., Howard, T. P., Takeda, D. Y., Ly, S. H., Kim, E., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0204-y · Cited by 556
A Designed Inhibitor of p53 Aggregation Rescues p53 Tumor Suppression in Ovarian Carcinomas
Soragni, A., Janzen, D. M., Johnson, L. M., Lindgren, A. G., Thai-Quynh Nguyen, A., Tiourin, E., Soriaga, A. B., Lu, J., Jiang, L., Faull, K. F., et al. (2016) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2015.12.002 · Cited by 341
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Kastenhuber, 2017, Putting p53 in context, Cell, 170, 1062, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.028 · DOI · Paper page
- Levine, 2020, p53: 800 million years of evolution and 40 years of discovery, Nat Rev Cancer, 20, 471, 10.1038/s41568-020-0262-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Cheng, 2021, Comprehensive characterization of protein–protein interactions perturbed by disease mutations, Nat Genet, 53, 342, 10.1038/s41588-020-00774-y · DOI · Paper page
- Kuan-lin Huang, 2018, Pathogenic germline variants in 10,389 adult cancers, Cell, 173, 355, 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.039 · DOI · Paper page
- Mantovani, 2019, Mutant p53 as a guardian of the cancer cell, Cell Death Differ, 26, 199, 10.1038/s41418-018-0246-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Kotler, 2018, A systematic p53 mutation library links differential functional impact to cancer mutation pattern and evolutionary conservation, Mol Cell, 71, 178, 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.012 · DOI · Paper page
- Bouaoun, 2016, Tp53 variations in human cancers: new lessons from the IARC TP53 database and genomics data, Hum Mutat, 37, 865, 10.1002/humu.23035 · DOI · Paper page
- The UniProt Consortium, 2018, UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase, Nucleic Acids Res, 46, 2699, 10.1093/nar/gky092 · DOI · Paper page
- Brandes, 2023, Genome-wide prediction of disease variant effects with a deep protein language model, Nat Genet, 55, 1512, 10.1038/s41588-023-01465-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Kosakovsky, 2020, Hyphy 2.5—A customizable platform for evolutionary hypothesis testing using phylogenies, Mol Biol Evol, 37, 295, 10.1093/molbev/msz197 · DOI · Paper page
- Wisotsky, 2020, Synonymous site-to-site substitution rate variation dramatically inflates false positive rates of selection analyses: ignore at your own peril, Mol Biol Evol, 37, 2430, 10.1093/molbev/msaa037 · DOI
- Tate, 2010, Cosmic: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer, Nucleic Acids Res, 38, 164
- Stephens, 2012, The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer, Nature, 486, 400, 10.1038/nature11017 · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, 2016, Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system, 785, 10.1145/2939672.2939785 · DOI · Paper page
- Raimondi, 2017, DEOGEN2: prediction and interactive visualization of single amino acid variant deleteriousness in human proteins, Nucleic Acids Res, 45, W201, 10.1093/nar/gkx390 · DOI · Paper page
- Gunning, 2019, Xai—Explainable artificial intelligence, Sci Rob, 4, eaay7120, 10.1126/scirobotics.aay7120 · DOI · Paper page
- Stein, 2010, The case for cloud computing in genome informatics, Genome Biol, 11, 207, 10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-207 · DOI · Paper page
- Niroula, 2017, Predicting severity of disease-causing variants, Hum Mutat, 38, 357, 10.1002/humu.23173 · DOI
- Joerger, 2007, Structural biology of the tumor suppressor p53 and cancer-associated mutants, Adv Cancer Res, 97, 1
- Bullock, 1997, Thermodynamic stability of wild-type and mutant p53 core domain, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 94, 14338, 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14338 · DOI · Paper page
- Varadi, 2022, Alphafold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, D439, 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- Ng, 2003, SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function, Nucleic Acids Res, 31, 3812, 10.1093/nar/gkg509 · DOI · Paper page
- Adzhubei, 2010, A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations, Nat Methods, 7, 248, 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · DOI · Paper page
- Ioannidis, 2016, REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants, Am. J Hum Genet, 99, 877, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
- Howe, 2021, Ensembl 2021, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D884, 10.1093/nar/gkaa942 · DOI · Paper page
- Herrero, 2016, Ensembl comparative genomics resources, Database, 2016, bav096, 10.1093/database/bav096 · DOI · Paper page
- Löytynoja, 2013, Phylogeny-aware alignment with prank, 155, 10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_10 · DOI · Paper page
- Nguyen, 2015, IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies, Mol Biol Evol, 32, 268, 10.1093/molbev/msu300 · DOI · Paper page
- Soubrier, 2012, The influence of rate heterogeneity among sites on the time dependence of molecular rates, Mol Biol Evol, 29, 3345, 10.1093/molbev/mss140 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoang, 2018, UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation, Mol Biol Evol, 35, 518, 10.1093/molbev/msx281 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Raza Abbas, S., Abbas, Z., Zahir, A., Ur Rehman, M., & Won Lee, S.
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1467-5463
- 1477-4054
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Sungkyunkwan University
- BK21 FOUR
- Ministry of Education, Korea
- Ministry of Education and Ministry of Science & ICT, Republic of Korea (NRF [2021-R1-I1A2 (059735)], RS [2024-0040 (5650)], RS [2024-0044 (0881)], RS [2019-II19 (0421)], RS [2025-2544 (3209)])
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenomics to structure: evolutionary and clinical signals in the TP53 DNA-binding core through LOOCV-validated ensemble learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bib/bbag087
- The paper
- Raza Abbas, S., Abbas, Z., Zahir, A., Ur Rehman, M., & Won Lee, S. (2026). Phylogenomics to structure: evolutionary and clinical signals in the TP53 DNA-binding core through LOOCV-validated ensemble learning. Briefings in Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbag087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.