Cited by 47Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

CellVGAE: an unsupervised scRNA-seq analysis workflow with graph attention networks

Open access
Buterez, David, Bica, Ioana, Tariq, Ifrah, Andrés-Terré, Helena, Liò, Pietro·2022·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Single-cell RNA sequencing allows high-resolution views of individual cells for libraries of up to millions of samples, thus motivating the use of deep learning for analysis. In this study, we introduce the use of graph neural networks for the unsupervised exploration of scRNA-seq data by developing a variational graph autoencoder architecture with graph attention layers that operates directly on the connectivity between cells, focusing on dimensionality reduction and clustering. With the help of several case studies, we show that our model, named CellVGAE, can be effectively used for exploratory analysis even on challenging datasets, by extracting meaningful features from the data and providing the means to visualize and interpret different aspects of the model. Results: We show that CellVGAE is more interpretable than existing scRNA-seq variational architectures by analysing the graph attention coefficients. By drawing parallels with other scRNA-seq studies on interpretability, we assess the validity of the relationships modelled by attention, and furthermore, we show that CellVGAE can intrinsically capture information such as pseudotime and NF-ĸB activation dynamics, the latter being a property that is not generally shared by existing neural alternatives. We then evaluate the dimensionality reduction and clustering performance on 9 difficult and well-annotated datasets by comparing with three leading neural and non-neural techniques, concluding that CellVGAE outperforms competing methods. Finally, we report a decrease in training times of up to × 20 on a dataset of 1.3 million cells compared to existing deep learning architectures. Availabilityand implementation: The CellVGAE code is available at https://github.com/davidbuterez/CellVGAE. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab804

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods that use only gene expression data typically transform the co-expression matrix into a more topologically meaningful form.

    “Methods that rely solely on gene expression data typically transform the co-expression matrix into a more topologically meaningful form [146, 147, 148].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [146]

  • Gene expression data can also directly construct disease and gene networks that are input into a joint matrix factorization and GCN method to infer disease-gene associations, similar to a recommendation task.

    “Alternatively, gene expression data can directly be used to construct disease and gene networks that are then input into a joint matrix factorization and GCN method to draw disease-gene associations, akin to a recommendation task (Section 2.2) [146].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [146]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Brody S. et al (2022) How attentive are graph attention networks? Submitted to The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, under review.
  2. Kingma D.P., Welling M. (2014) Auto-encoding variational Bayes. 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Banff, AB, Canada, April 14-16, 2014, Conference Track Proceedings.
  3. Kipf T.N., Welling M. (2016a) Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings.
  4. Kipf T.N., Welling M. (2016b). Variational graph auto-encoders. Bayesian Deep Learning Workshop (NIPS 2016), December 10, 2016 - Centre Convencions Internacional Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  5. Maas A.L. et al (2013) Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2013.
  6. Veličković P. et al (2018) Graph attention networks. 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April 30 - May 3, 2018, Conference Track Proceedings

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buterez, D., Bica, I., Tariq, I., Andrés-Terré, H., & Liò, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB3 0FD, UK
Corresponding author
Buterez, David
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2021-12-02
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
1277-1286
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4226296494
Cited by
44
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
variational graph autoencoder, graph attention networks, single-cell RNA sequencing, unsupervised dimensionality reduction, cell clustering, interpretability, pseudotime, graph neural networks
MeSH terms
Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Workflow, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review