Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,760

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ZDOCK server: interactive docking prediction of protein–protein complexes and symmetric multimers

Open access
Pierce, Brian G., Wiehe, Kevin, Hwang, Howook, Kim, Bong-Hyun, Vreven, Thom, Weng, Zhiping·2014·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: Protein–protein interactions are essential to cellular and immune function, and in many cases, because of the absence of an experimentally determined structure of the complex, these interactions must be modeled to obtain an understanding of their molecular basis. We present a user-friendly protein docking server, based on the rigid-body docking programs ZDOCK and M-ZDOCK, to predict structures of protein–protein complexes and symmetric multimers. With a goal of providing an accessible and intuitive interface, we provide options for users to guide the scoring and the selection of output models, in addition to dynamic visualization of input structures and output docking models. This server enables the research community to easily and quickly produce structural models of protein–protein complexes and symmetric multimers for their own analysis. Availability: The ZDOCK server is freely available to all academic and non-profit users at: http://zdock.umassmed.edu. No registration is required. Contact: brian.pierce@umassmed.edu or zhiping.weng@umassmed.edu

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pierce, B. G., Wiehe, K., Hwang, H., Kim, B.-H., Vreven, T., & Weng, Z.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2014-02-14
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
1771-1773
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2170564629
Cited by
1,760
References
0
FWCI
36.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.