Cited by 313Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGene expression and cancer classificationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Polyester : simulating RNA-seq datasets with differential transcript expression

Open access
Frazee, Alyssa C., Jaffe, Andrew E., Langmead, Ben, Leek, Jeffrey T.·2015·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Statistical methods development for differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) requires software tools to assess accuracy and error rate control. Since true differential expression status is often unknown in experimental datasets, artificially constructed datasets must be utilized, either by generating costly spike-in experiments or by simulating RNA-seq data. Results: Polyester is an R package designed to simulate RNA-seq data, beginning with an experimental design and ending with collections of RNA-seq reads. Its main advantage is the ability to simulate reads indicating isoform-level differential expression across biological replicates for a variety of experimental designs. Data generated by Polyester is a reasonable approximation to real RNA-seq data and standard differential expression workflows can recover differential expression set in the simulation by the user. Availability and implementation: Polyester is freely available from Bioconductor (http://bioconductor.org/). Contact: jtleek@gmail.com Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv272

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polyester allows simulating experiments with differential transcript expression and biological variability, enabling assessment of accuracy and downstream differential expression performance.

    “In addition to the ability to generate reads, Polyester allows simulating experiments with differential transcript expression and biological variability. Thus, we can assess not only the accuracy of the resulting estimates, but also how these estimates would perform in a typical downstream analysis task like differential expression testing.”
  • Results from SEQC, GEUVADIS, and Polyester (simulated with bias) are expected to better represent typical real-world performance.

    “However, we expect results on the SEQC [12], GEUVADIS [11], and Polyester [13] (simulated with bias) data sets to be more representative of typical real-world performance.”
  • A parallel self-hosted continuous integration system runs Salmon on simulated samples on each commit, stores accuracy metrics, and allows tracking accuracy and identifying performance regressions across commits.

    “For this task, a parallel, self-hosted continuous integration system has been created. On each commit to the Salmon repository, a Drone (Drone-CI) server pulls the latest commit, and builds it in a clean CentOS5 environment using Docker [30]. In addition to the functionality tests, Salmon is run on simulated samples (generated using Polyester [13]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ismail,N. and Jemain,A.A. (2007). Handling overdispersion with negative bi- nomial and generalized Poisson regression models. In: Casualty Actuarial Society Forum. Citeseer. pp.103-158.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frazee, A. C., Jaffe, A. E., Langmead, B., & Leek, J. T.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Leek, Jeffrey T.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2015-04-28
Volume
31
Issue
17
Pages
2778-2784
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2112876600
Cited by
313
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Lieber Institute for Brain Development
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01, UL1TR001079)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM105705)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
differential gene expression, synthetic dataset, spike-in experiments, biological replicates, experimental design, Bioconductor
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22, Europe, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetics, Population, Haplotypes, Humans, RNA, Software, Binomial Distribution, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology, Protein Isoforms, Gene Expression Profiling, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review