Cited by 1,479Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

PhenoScanner: a database of human genotype-phenotype associations.

Open access
Staley, James R., Blackshaw, James, Kamat, Mihir A., Ellis, Steve, Surendran, Praveen, Sun, Benjamin B., Paul, Dirk S., Freitag, Daniel +4 more·2016·Bioinformatics

Abstract

PhenoScanner is a curated database of publicly available results from large-scale genetic association studies. This tool aims to facilitate 'phenome scans', the cross-referencing of genetic variants with many phenotypes, to help aid understanding of disease pathways and biology. The database currently contains over 350 million association results and over 10 million unique genetic variants, mostly single nucleotide polymorphisms. It is accompanied by a web-based tool that queries the database for associations with user-specified variants, providing results according to the same effect and non-effect alleles for each input variant. The tool provides the option of searching for trait associations with proxies of the input variants, calculated using the European samples from 1000 Genomes and Hapmap. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PhenoScanner is available at www.phenoscanner.medschl.cam.ac.uk CONTACT: jrs95@medschl.cam.ac.ukSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw373

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences between the two samples in population characteristics such as age, sex, and socio-economic background can affect not only the interpretation of causal estimates, but also the validity of causal inferences.

    “Alternatively, the two samples could differ substantially according to population characteristics such as age, sex, socio-economic background, and so on 32 . Such differences can affect not only the interpretation of causal estimates, but also the validity of causal inferences 33 .”
  • If the genetic associations with the exposure vary over time, then Mendelian randomization estimates based on genetic associations with the exposure measured at a single timepoint can be unreliable.

    “If the genetic associations with the exposure vary over time, then Mendelian randomization estimates based on genetic associations with the exposure measured at a single timepoint can be unreliable 33 .”
  • As genetic variants typically affect usual levels of exposures on a long-term basis, Mendelian randomization estimates are often larger than those from conventional observational studies or randomized trials for the same magnitude of difference in the exposure.

    “As genetic variants typically affect usual levels of exposures on a long-term basis, Mendelian randomization estimates are often larger than those from conventional observational studies or randomized trials for the same magnitude of difference in the exposure 33 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staley, J. R., Blackshaw, J., Kamat, M. A., Ellis, S., Surendran, P., Sun, B. B., Paul, D. S., Freitag, D., Burgess, S., Danesh, J., Young, R., & Butterworth, A. S.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Staley, James R.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2016-06-17
Volume
32
Issue
20
Pages
3207-3209
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2398690791
Cited by
1,479
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 413 · 2023: 241 · 2022: 198 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
52.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer (G73632)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10165)
  • British Heart Foundation (G0800270, SP/09/002, RG/13/13/30194, RG/08/014/24067)
  • European Commission (279233)
  • Medical Research Council (G66840, SP/09/002, G0800270, MR/L003120/1)
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (268834)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
genotype-phenotype correlation, genetic association studies, single nucleotide polymorphisms, genetic variants, disease pathways, genetic proxies, 1000 Genomes Project, HapMap
MeSH terms
Genotype, Humans, Phenotype, Software, Genetic Variation, Databases, Factual, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review