Cited by 1,852Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGene expression and cancer classification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is increasingly used to study gene expression at the level of individual cells. However, preparing raw sequence data for further analysis is not a straightforward process. Biases, artifacts and other sources of unwanted variation are present in the data, requiring substantial time and effort to be spent on pre-processing, quality control (QC) and normalization. Results: We have developed the R/Bioconductor package scater to facilitate rigorous pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of scRNA-seq data. The package provides a convenient, flexible workflow to process raw sequencing reads into a high-quality expression dataset ready for downstream analysis. scater provides a rich suite of plotting tools for single-cell data and a flexible data structure that is compatible with existing tools and can be used as infrastructure for future software development. Availability and Implementation: The open-source code, along with installation instructions, vignettes and case studies, is available through Bioconductor at http://bioconductor.org/packages/scater. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 63 references

3 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Campbell, 2016, Ouija: Incorporating prior knowledge in single-cell trajectory learning using Bayesian nonlinear factor analysis, bioRxiv, 060442
  2. Hicks, 2015, On the widespread and critical impact of systematic bias and batch effects in single-cell RNA-Seq data, bioRxiv, 025528

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,006

Metadata

Authors
McCarthy, D. J., Campbell, K. R., Lun, A. T. L., & Wills, Q. F.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, Davis J
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2017-01-14
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
1179-1186
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2951158909
Cited by
1,852
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 188 · 2025: 247 · 2024: 261 · 2023: 275 · 2022: 248 · 2021: 213 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 22
FWCI
44.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1112, 681 to D.J.M.)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (D.J.M.)
  • Cancer Research UK (A1719, 7 to A.T.L.L.)
  • United Kingdom Medical Research Council (K.R.C.)
  • Oxford Single Cell Biology Consortium (Q.F.W.)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, R/Bioconductor package, data preprocessing, quality control, normalization, data visualization, gene expression data, sequencing artifacts
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Humans, Programming Languages, Quality Control, RNA, Software, Statistics as Topic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Principal Component Analysis, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review