The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION
Abstract
A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION M. G. KENDALL M. G. KENDALL Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Biometrika, Volume 30, Issue 1-2, June 1938, Pages 81–93, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81 Published: 01 June 1938
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.
Ferguson, C. J. (2009) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0015808 · Cited by 3,467
The Medical Segmentation Decathlon
Antonelli, M., Reinke, A., Bakas, S., Farahani, K., Kopp-Schneider, A., Landman, B. A., Litjens, G., Menze, B., Ronneberger, O., Summers, R. M., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30695-9 · Cited by 1,384
Summary of ChatGPT-Related research and perspective towards the future of large language models
Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., He, H., Li, A., He, M., Liu, Z., et al. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100017 · Cited by 855
(2011) · Cited by 675
Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures
Croux, C., & Dehon, C. (2010) · Statistical Methods & Applications · doi:10.1007/s10260-010-0142-z · Cited by 634
Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems
Sanderson, M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000009 · Cited by 485
Parameters behind “Nonparametric” Statistics: Kendall's tau, Somers’ D and Median Differences
Newson, R. (2002) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0200200103 · Cited by 394
Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce web sites
Hannak, A., Soeller, G., Lazer, D., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference · doi:10.1145/2663716.2663744 · Cited by 405
BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation
Yuan, W., Neubig, G., & Liu, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.11520 · Cited by 353
A Theoretical Analysis of NDCG Type Ranking Measures
Wang, Y., Wang, L., Li, Y., He, D., Liu, T.-Y., & Chen, W. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1304.6480 · Cited by 351
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001 · Cited by 236
Is chatGPT a good nlg evaluator? A preliminary study
Wang, J., Liang, Y., Meng, F., Sun, Z., Shi, H., Li, Z., Xu, J., Qu, J., & Zhou, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 4th New Frontiers in Summarization Workshop · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.newsum-1.1 · Cited by 235
Climate model benchmarking with glacial and mid-Holocene climates
Harrison, S. P., Bartlein, P. J., Brewer, S., Prentice, I. C., Boyd, M., Hessler, I., Holmgren, K., Izumi, K., & Willis, K. (2014) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1922-6 · Cited by 231
Interpreting Kendall’s Tau and Tau- U for single-case experimental designs
Brossart, D. F., Laird, V. C., & Armstrong, T. W. (2018) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2018.1518687 · Cited by 210
Li, R. Y., Di Felice, R., Rohs, R., & Lidar, D. A. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0060-8 · Cited by 202
Alves Gomes, M., & Meisen, T. (2023) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-023-00640-4 · Cited by 165
The multimodality cell segmentation challenge: toward universal solutions
Ma, J., Xie, R., Ayyadhury, S., Ge, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, R., Gu, S., Zhang, Y., Lee, G., Kim, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02233-6 · Cited by 154
Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare
Kleinberg, J., & Raghavan, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2018340118 · Cited by 147
Robust covariance and scatter matrix estimation under Huber’s contamination model
Chen, M., Gao, C., & Ren, Z. (2018) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/17-aos1607 · Cited by 146
Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system
Swift, S., Morris, S., McKinnie, V., Freeman, R., Petri, E., Scotti, R. J., & Dwyer, P. (2006) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-006-0076-z · Cited by 133
Assessing mental stress from the photoplethysmogram: a numerical study
Charlton, P. H., Celka, P., Farukh, B., Chowienczyk, P., & Alastruey, J. (2018) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/aabe6a · Cited by 131
Environmental Impact of Buildings─What Matters?
Heeren, N., Mutel, C. L., Steubing, B., Ostermeyer, Y., Wallbaum, H., & Hellweg, S. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01735 · Cited by 128
Spearman Rank Correlation: Overview
Zar, J. H. (2014) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat05964 · Cited by 114
Pandia, K., Inan, O. T., Kovacs, G. T. A., & Giovangrandi, L. (2012) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/33/10/1643 · Cited by 114
Kang, J., Wang, L., Yan, C., Wang, J., Liang, X., & He, Y. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.033 · Cited by 111
Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis
Losilla, J.-M., Oliveras, I., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Vives, J. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021 · Cited by 111
Chen, J. H., Alagappan, M., Goldstein, M. K., Asch, S. M., & Altman, R. B. (2017) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.006 · Cited by 101
Viaene, S., Baes, M., Tamm, A., Tempel, E., Bendo, G., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., Boquien, M., Boselli, A., Camps, P., Cooray, A., et al. (2017) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629251 · Cited by 79
Additive dose response models: defining synergy
Lederer, S., Dijkstra, T. M. H., & Heskes, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01384 · Cited by 74
Nature-inspired framework for hyperspectral band selection
Nakamura, R. Y. M., Fonseca, L. M. G., Santos, J. A. D., Torres, R. D. S., Yang, X.-S., & Papa, J. P. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2013.2258351 · Cited by 70
Training-free Transformer Architecture Search
Zhou, Q., Sheng, K., Zheng, X., Li, K., Sun, X., Tian, Y., Chen, J., & Ji, R. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01062 · Cited by 64
Wheeler, L. C., Walker, J. F., Ng, J., Deanna, R., Dunbar-Wallis, A., Backes, A., Pezzi, P. H., Palchetti, M. V., Robertson, H. M., Monaghan, A., et al. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msac044 · Cited by 63
Population‐based stroke and dementia incidence trends: Age and sex variations
Cerasuolo, J. O., Cipriano, L. E., Sposato, L. A., Kapral, M. K., Fang, J., Gill, S. S., Hackam, D. G., & Hachinski, V. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.02.010 · Cited by 59
Ties that bind: Local networks, communities and adaptive capacity in rural Ghana
Chaudhury, A. S., Thornton, T. F., Helfgott, A., Ventresca, M. J., & Sova, C. (2017) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.010 · Cited by 54
Modeling Uncertainty with Hedged Instance Embedding
Oh, S. J., Murphy, K., Pan, J., Roth, J., Schroff, F., & Gallagher, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.00319 · Cited by 55
Characterization of e-Government adoption in Europe
Yera, A., Arbelaitz, O., Jauregui, O., & Muguerza, J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231585 · Cited by 52
An Experimental Exploration of Marsaglia's xorshift Generators, Scrambled
Vigna, S. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · doi:10.1145/2845077 · Cited by 55
“The scatter plot in Figure 5 and Kendall’s(5) τ ≈ 0.98 between the two rankings we obtain make rather clear that this is not the case. In particular, the four best conjugate pairs in Table I are the same with both seeds. To gather more information, we ran the full BigCrush suite and Dieharder on our four best generato…”
InfluentialEvaluation Examples are not Equally Informative: How should that change NLP Leaderboards?
Rodriguez, P., Barrow, J., Hoyle, A. M., Lalor, J. P., Jia, R., & Boyd-Graber, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.346 · Cited by 47
Analogy Generation by Prompting Large Language Models: A Case Study of InstructGPT
Bhavya, B., Xiong, J., & Zhai, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Natural Language Generation · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.inlg-main.25 · Cited by 40
Understanding Self-attention Mechanism via Dynamical System Perspective
Huang, Z., Liang, M., Qin, J., Zhong, S., & Lin, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00136 · Cited by 44
“So we further calculate the rank correlation (kendall correlation [31] and spearman correlation [45]) between the TNS and the model performance.”
MethodRandomization tests: A new gold standard?
Dugard, P. (2014) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.10.001 · Cited by 37
Nowicki, J., Hebda-Sobkowicz, J., Zimroz, R., & Wyłomańska, A. (2021) · Applied Acoustics · doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.107974 · Cited by 31
Lienert, J., Andersson, J. C. M., Hofmann, D., Silva Pinto, F., & Kuller, M. (2022) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-26-2899-2022 · Cited by 26
Limitations of Neural Map Topography for Decoding Spatial Information
Avitan, L., Pujic, Z., Hughes, N. J., Scott, E. K., & Goodhill, G. J. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0385-16.2016 · Cited by 26
Adaptive method for following dynamic topics on twitter
Magdy, W., & Elsayed, T. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14540 · Cited by 26
Robust and sparse correlation matrix estimation for the analysis of high-dimensional genomics data
Serra, A., Coretto, P., Fratello, M., & Tagliaferri, R. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx642 · Cited by 25
Transferability-Guided Cross-Domain Cross-Task Transfer Learning
Tan, Y., Zhang, E., Li, Y., Huang, S.-L., & Zhang, X.-P. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3358094 · Cited by 24
“…of transferability metrics, we adopt the commonly used Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (Spearman’s ρ coefficient) and the Kendall rank correlation coefficient (Kendall’s τ coefficient) [35] to assess the correlation between the transfer accuracy and predicted transferability scores.”
Bi-factor analyses of the brief test of adult cognition by telephone
Gavett, B. E., Crane, P. K., & Dams-O'Connor, K. (2013) · NeuroRehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-130842 · Cited by 23
Quality indices for topic model selection and evaluation: a literature review and case study
Meaney, C., Stukel, T. A., Austin, P. C., Moineddin, R., Greiver, M., & Escobar, M. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02216-1 · Cited by 23
Maunick, B., Skvarc, D., Olive, L., & Mikocka-Walus, A. (2023) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111366 · Cited by 21
All pay auctions and group size: Grading on a curve and other applications
Andreoni, J., & Brownback, A. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.017 · Cited by 18
FIDO2 the Rescue? Platform vs. Roaming Authentication on Smartphones
Würsching, L., Putz, F., Haesler, S., & Hollick, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580993 · Cited by 17
Accatino, F., Creed, I. F., & Weber, M. (2018) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13084 · Cited by 16
What are the characteristics of highly-selected packages? A case study on the npm ecosystem
Mujahid, S., Abdalkareem, R., & Shihab, E. (2023) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2022.111588 · Cited by 16
Implementation of a mobile inpatient quality of life (QoL) assessment for oncology nursing
Schuler, M. K., Trautmann, F., Radloff, M., Schmädig, R., Hentschel, L., Eberlein-Gonska, M., Petzold, T., Vetter, H., Oberlack, S., Ehninger, G., et al. (2016) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3163-9 · Cited by 10
Revisiting Training-free NAS Metrics: An Efficient Training-based Method
Yang, T., Yang, L., Jin, X., & Chen, C. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00473 · Cited by 9
NASformer: Neural architecture search for vision transformer
Ni, B., Meng, G., Xiang, S., & Pan, C. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02375-0_4 · Cited by 9
A Consideration of the Measurement and Reporting of Interrater Reliability
Day, F. C., & Schriger, D. L. (2009) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.07.013 · Cited by 8
Constantin, R., Duck, M., Alexandrov, A., Matosevic, P., Keidar, D., & El-Assady, M. (2022) · 2022 IEEE Workshop on TRust and EXpertise in Visual Analytics (TREX) · doi:10.1109/trex57753.2022.00005 · Cited by 3
DebateQA: Evaluating Question Answering on Debatable Knowledge
Xu, R., Qi, X., Qi, Z., Xu, W., & Guo, Z. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-eacl.44 · Cited by 1
Are Performance-Optimization Benchmarks Reliably Measuring Coding Agents?
Chen, Z., Sun, Z., Shi, Y., Lo, D., & Jiang, L. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.01211 · Cited by 9
Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare
(2023) · The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603202
Scientific discovery as meta-optimization: a combinatorial optimization case study
Zhang, Y.-H., Sipling, C., & Di Ventra, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.26728
Metadata
- Authors
- KENDALL, M. G.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1938-06-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 81-93
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W1985514943
- Cited by
- 7,269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.