Cited by 298Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceReading and Literacy Development

Severe nonfluency in aphasia. Role of the medial subcallosal fasciculus and other white matter pathways in recovery of spontaneous speech

NAESER, MARGARET A., PALUMBO, CAROLE L., HELM-ESTABROOKS, NANCY, STIASSNY-EDER, DENISE, ALBERT, MARTIN L.·1989·Brain

Abstract

The relationship between location and extent of lesion on CT scan and limitation in spontaneous speech was examined. The severity of spontaneous speech ranged from cases with no speech or only verbal stereotypies (first major group) to those with reduced, hesitant, poorly articulated, agrammatic speech (nonfluent Broca's aphasia, second major group). CT scan analysis revealed no single neuroanatomical area that contained an extensive lesion which could be used to discriminate the most severe cases from the least severe. The two groups were separable, however, on the basis of the CT scan when the extent of the lesion in two subcortical white matter areas were combined: (1) the most medial and rostral portion of the subcallosal fasciculus plus (2) the periventricular white matter near the body of the lateral ventricle, deep to the lower motor/sensory cortex area for the mouth. The most rostral portion of the medial subcallosal fasciculus, located in the lateral angle of the frontal horn (extremely deep to Broca's area), contains projections from the cingulate gyrus (area 24) and the supplementary motor area, to the caudate nucleus. We suggest that one explanation for the more severe limitation in spontaneous speech in the first group is the extensive white matter lesion in these two subcortical pathways had interrupted a large number of connections for (1) initiation and preparation of speech movements, and limbic aspects of speech (lesions in the medial subcallosal fasciculus), and (2) motor execution and sensory feedback for spontaneous speech (lesions in periventricular white matter deep to the motor/sensory cortex area for the mouth). Extensive lesion in only one of these two white matter pathway areas, alone was not sufficient to produce long-lasting severe limitation in spontaneous speech and could not be used to discriminate the two groups on the basis of the CT scans. The patients with less severe limitation in spontaneous speech (nonfluent Broca's aphasia) had less extensive lesion within these two white matter areas combined, and had interrupted a smaller number of these subcortical connections. The sites of the lesions in subcortical white matter in CT scans in Broca's original case who could only produce a verbal stereotypy are similar to those in our first group with the most severe limitation in spontaneous speech. The presence or absence of hemiplegia was not related to severity or recovery of spontaneous speech. Careful examination of lesion extent in these two areas of subcortical white matter on CT scanning appears to be relevant in predicting potential for recovery of spontaneous speech in some stroke patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/112.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combined stroke damage to the medial subcallosal fasciculus and periventricular white matter has previously been associated with persistent non-fluent speech production.

    “there are other white matter tracts where combined stroke damage has previously been associated with persistent non-fluent speech production. These fibre pathways are more deeply situated (i.e. adjacent to the lateral ventricle) than the ones studied here and comprise the medial subcallosal fasciculus and periventricular white matter (Naeser et al., 1989; Naeser and Palumbo, 1994).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NAESER, M. A., PALUMBO, C. L., HELM-ESTABROOKS, N., STIASSNY-EDER, D., & ALBERT, M. L.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
NAESER, MARGARET A.
Venue
Brain
Published
1989
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
1-38
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2120831329
Cited by
298
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-06209)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
aphasia severity, spontaneous speech, periventricular white matter, subcortical white matter lesions, lesion extent, speech initiation, hemiplegia, Broca's area, cingulate gyrus, supplementary motor area
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aphasia, Aphasia, Broca, Brain, Corpus Callosum, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Speech, Stereotyped Behavior, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review