Severe nonfluency in aphasia. Role of the medial subcallosal fasciculus and other white matter pathways in recovery of spontaneous speech
Abstract
The relationship between location and extent of lesion on CT scan and limitation in spontaneous speech was examined. The severity of spontaneous speech ranged from cases with no speech or only verbal stereotypies (first major group) to those with reduced, hesitant, poorly articulated, agrammatic speech (nonfluent Broca's aphasia, second major group). CT scan analysis revealed no single neuroanatomical area that contained an extensive lesion which could be used to discriminate the most severe cases from the least severe. The two groups were separable, however, on the basis of the CT scan when the extent of the lesion in two subcortical white matter areas were combined: (1) the most medial and rostral portion of the subcallosal fasciculus plus (2) the periventricular white matter near the body of the lateral ventricle, deep to the lower motor/sensory cortex area for the mouth. The most rostral portion of the medial subcallosal fasciculus, located in the lateral angle of the frontal horn (extremely deep to Broca's area), contains projections from the cingulate gyrus (area 24) and the supplementary motor area, to the caudate nucleus. We suggest that one explanation for the more severe limitation in spontaneous speech in the first group is the extensive white matter lesion in these two subcortical pathways had interrupted a large number of connections for (1) initiation and preparation of speech movements, and limbic aspects of speech (lesions in the medial subcallosal fasciculus), and (2) motor execution and sensory feedback for spontaneous speech (lesions in periventricular white matter deep to the motor/sensory cortex area for the mouth). Extensive lesion in only one of these two white matter pathway areas, alone was not sufficient to produce long-lasting severe limitation in spontaneous speech and could not be used to discriminate the two groups on the basis of the CT scans. The patients with less severe limitation in spontaneous speech (nonfluent Broca's aphasia) had less extensive lesion within these two white matter areas combined, and had interrupted a smaller number of these subcortical connections. The sites of the lesions in subcortical white matter in CT scans in Broca's original case who could only produce a verbal stereotypy are similar to those in our first group with the most severe limitation in spontaneous speech. The presence or absence of hemiplegia was not related to severity or recovery of spontaneous speech. Careful examination of lesion extent in these two areas of subcortical white matter on CT scanning appears to be relevant in predicting potential for recovery of spontaneous speech in some stroke patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Combined stroke damage to the medial subcallosal fasciculus and periventricular white matter has previously been associated with persistent non-fluent speech production.
“there are other white matter tracts where combined stroke damage has previously been associated with persistent non-fluent speech production. These fibre pathways are more deeply situated (i.e. adjacent to the lateral ventricle) than the ones studied here and comprise the medial subcallosal fasciculus and periventricular white matter (Naeser et al., 1989; Naeser and Palumbo, 1994).”
From Damage to Broca’s area does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after stroke (2021) · cites this paper as Naeser et al., 1989
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paul Broca's historic cases: high resolution MR imaging of the brains of Leborgne and Lelong
Dronkers, N. F., Plaisant, O., Iba-Zizen, M. T., & Cabanis, E. A. (2007) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm042 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Martino, J., De Witt Hamer, P. C., Berger, M. S., Lawton, M. T., Arnold, C. M., de Lucas, E. M., & Duffau, H. (2013) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0386-5 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Impairment of speech production predicted by lesion load of the left arcuate fasciculus
Marchina, S., Zhu, L. L., Norton, A., Zipse, L., Wan, C. Y., & Schlaug, G. (2011) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.110.606103 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus predicts non-fluent speech production in aphasia
Fridriksson, J., Guo, D., Fillmore, P., Holland, A., & Rorden, C. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt267 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Damage to Broca’s area does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after stroke
Gajardo-Vidal, A., Lorca-Puls, D. L., team, P., Warner, H., Pshdary, B., Crinion, J. T., Leff, A. P., Hope, T. M. H., Geva, S., Seghier, M. L., et al. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa460 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Variability in recovery from aphasia
Lazar, R. M., & Antoniello, D. (2008) · Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s11910-008-0079-x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Regional white matter damage predicts speech fluency in chronic post-stroke aphasia
Basilakos, A., Fillmore, P. T., Rorden, C., Guo, D., Bonilha, L., & Fridriksson, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00845 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Therapy-induced brain reorganization patterns in aphasia
Abel, S., Weiller, C., Huber, W., Willmes, K., & Specht, K. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv022 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Kurland, J., & Falcon, M. (2011) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699206.2011.565398 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Dissociation of letter and picture naming resulting from callosal disconnection
Suzuki, K., Yamadori, A., Endo, K., Fujii, T., Ezura, M., & Takahashi, A. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.51.5.1390 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- NAESER, M. A., PALUMBO, C. L., HELM-ESTABROOKS, N., STIASSNY-EDER, D., & ALBERT, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- NAESER, MARGARET A.
- ORCID
- NAESER, MARGARET A.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-38
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2120831329
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-06209)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- aphasia severity, spontaneous speech, periventricular white matter, subcortical white matter lesions, lesion extent, speech initiation, hemiplegia, Broca's area, cingulate gyrus, supplementary motor area
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aphasia, Aphasia, Broca, Brain, Corpus Callosum, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Speech, Stereotyped Behavior, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review