Cited by 51Hemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Dissociation of letter and picture naming resulting from callosal disconnection

Suzuki, K., Yamadori, A., Endo, K., Fujii, T., Ezura, M., Takahashi, A.·1998·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detailed mapping of the corpus callosum for functional fractionation in humans remains incomplete. OBJECTIVE: To examine separable interhemispheric transfer of visual information by callosal fibers, especially in the splenium. METHODS: We examined callosal disconnection signs in a 14-year-old boy with a lesion confined to the posterior part of the splenium and reviewed reported cases with callosal lesions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The patient presented with left hemialexia as the only manifestation of callosal disconnection syndrome. The only difficulty demonstrated was in reading aloud or copying letters, which were presented tachistoscopically to the left visual field, with his right hand. He could copy letters presented to his left visual field with his left hand, however. Therefore, left hemialexia was not due to hemiamblyopia or hemineglect. There was no anomia for pictures and colors in the left visual field. MRI revealed that the lesion was limited to the ventroposterior end of the splenium. Review of 40 reported patients with callosal lesions suggests that the anterior to middle part of the splenium is involved in transferring picture information from the language-nondominant hemisphere to the language-dominant hemisphere and that the ventroposterior part is involved in transferring letter information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.51.5.1390

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alexia restricted to the left half of the visual field results from lesions of posterior callosal pathways.

    “The clearest example of such a deafferentation is the alexia restricted to the left half of the visual field which results from lesions of posterior callosal pathways (Suzuki et al., 1998).”

    From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Suzuki et al., 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suzuki, K., Yamadori, A., Endo, K., Fujii, T., Ezura, M., & Takahashi, A.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1998-11
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
1390-1394
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2146318512
Cited by
51
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
corpus callosum, splenium, letter naming, picture naming, interhemispheric transfer, visual information transfer, language-dominant hemisphere, callosal lesions, reading aloud, letter copying
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Cognition, Corpus Callosum, Embolization, Therapeutic, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review