Cited by 183Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles

Pluriformity of inflammation in multiple sclerosis shown by ultra-small iron oxide particle enhancement

Vellinga, Machteld M., Oude Engberink, Raoul D., Seewann, Alexandra, Pouwels, Petra J.W., Wattjes, Mike P., van der Pol, Susanne M.A., Pering, Christiane, Polman, Chris H. +3 more·2008·Brain

Abstract

Gadolinium-DTPA (Gd-DTPA) is routinely used as a marker for inflammation in MRI to visualize breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in multiple sclerosis. Recent data suggest that ultra-small superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIO) can be used to visualize cellular infiltration, another aspect of inflammation. This project aimed to compare the novel USPIO particle SHU555C to the longitudinal pattern of Gd-DTPA enhancement in multiple sclerosis. Nineteen relapsing-remitting patients were screened monthly using Gd-enhanced MRI. In case of new enhancing lesions, USPIO were injected and 24 h later, MRI was performed and blood was collected to confirm USPIO loading of circulating monocytes. Lesion development was monitored by 3 monthly Gd-DTPA-enhanced scans and a final scan 7-11 months after injection. USPIO-enhancement was observed as hyperintensity on T1-weighted images, whereas no signal changes were observed on T2-weighted-gradient-echo images. In 14 patients with disease activity, 188 USPIO-positive lesions were seen, 144 of which were Gd-negative. By contrast, there were a total of 59 Gd-positive lesions, 15 of which were USPIO negative. Three patterns of USPIO-enhancement were seen: (i) focal enhancement; (ii) ring-like enhancement and (iii) return to isointensity of a previously hypointense lesion. The latter pattern was most frequently observed for lesions that turned out to be transiently hypointense on follow-up scans, and ring-enhancing lesions were less likely to evolve into black holes at follow-up than lesions without ring-like USPIO-enhancement; we speculate this to be associated with repair. In 4% of the USPIO-positive/Gd negative lesions, USPIO-enhancement preceded Gd-enhancement by 1 month. USPIO-enhancement remained visible for up to 3 months in 1.5% of all USPIO-positive lesions. In 29% of the lesions enhancing with both contrast agents, USPIO-enhancement persisted whereas Gd-enhancement had already resolved. In conclusion, the new nano-particle SHU555C provides complementary information to Gd-enhanced MRI, probably related to monocyte infiltration. The use of USPIO-enhanced MRI is likely to lead to more insight in the pluriformity of inflammation in multiple sclerosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awn009

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Iron-oxide particles allow in vivo visualization of macrophages but are insensitive to non-phagocytic cells involved in inflammation.

    “Iron-oxide particles have been used to allow in vivo visualization of macrophages, but this method is insensitive to non-phagocytic cells involved in inflammation (Vellinga et al., 2008).”

    From Quantifying white matter tract diffusion parameters in the presence of increased extra-fiber cellularity and vasogenic edema (2014) · cites this paper as Vellinga et al., 2008

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that phagocytosis of iron-oxide particles by monocytes and macrophages enables visualization of cellular infiltration, supporting the first part of the claim. It does not establish that the method is insensitive to all non-phagocytic inflammatory cells; it also notes a report of particles in astrocytes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • USPIOs provide insights into the early stages of the inflammatory process preceding gadolinium enhancement.

    “The use of USPIOs provide insights into the early stages of the inflammatory process preceding gadolinium enhancement (64).”
  • Iron oxide nanoparticles have a key advantage over gadolinium-based contrast agents in MS imaging: they visualize monocyte/macrophage infiltration, which correlates with ongoing demyelination and disease progression.

    “In this context, a key advantage of using iron oxide nanoparticles over gadolinium-based contrast agents is the visualization of monocyte/macrophage infiltration by the former, which correlates with ongoing demyelination and is a hallmark of disease progression in MS [175–177].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dousset V, Delalande C, Ballarino L, Quesson B, Seilhan D, Coussemacq M, et al. In vivo macrophage activity imaging in the central nervous system detected by magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1999b; 41: 329-33.
  2. Xu S, Kay Jordan E, Brocke S, Bulte JW, Quigley L, Tresser N, et al. Study of relapsing remitting experimental allergic encephalomyelitis SJL mouse model using MION-46L enhanced in vivo MRI: early histopathological correlation. J Neurosci Res 1998; 52: 549-58.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vellinga, M. M., Oude Engberink, R. D., Seewann, A., Pouwels, P. J. W., Wattjes, M. P., van der Pol, S. M. A., Pering, C., Polman, C. H., de Vries, H. E., Geurts, J. J. G., & Barkhof, F.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Brain
Published
2008-02-02
Volume
131
Issue
3
Pages
800-807
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2121341823
Cited by
183
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, Gd-DTPA, inflammation, monocyte infiltration, blood-brain barrier disruption, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, lesion enhancement patterns, black holes, lesion repair, contrast-enhanced MRI
MeSH terms
Brain, Contrast Media, Dextrans, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Inflammation, Iron, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Monocytes, Oxides, Gadolinium DTPA, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Ferrosoferric Oxide, Magnetite Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review