Cited by 328Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Efficacy of prefrontal theta-burst stimulation in refractory depression: a randomized sham-controlled study

Li, Cheng-Ta, Chen, Mu-Hong, Juan, Chi-Hung, Huang, Hsiang-Hsuan, Chen, Li-Fen, Hsieh, Jen-Chuen, Tu, Pei-Chi, Bai, Ya-Mei +3 more·2014·Brain

Abstract

Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation could modulate cortical excitability and has the potential to treat refractory depression. However, there has been a lack of large randomized studies of the antidepressant efficacy of different forms of theta-burst stimulation, such as intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation. A randomized sham-controlled study was conducted to investigate antidepressant efficacy of theta-burst stimulation and to compare efficacy among left-prefrontal intermittent theta-burst stimulation, right-prefrontal continuous theta-burst stimulation and a combination of them in patients showing different levels of antidepressant refractoriness. A group of 60 treatment-refractory patients with recurrent major depressive disorder were recruited and randomized to four groups (Group A: continuous theta-burst stimulation; Group B: intermittent theta-burst stimulation; Group C: a combination of continuous and intermittent theta-burst stimulation; and Group D: sham theta-burst stimulation; 15 patients were included in each group). After 2 weeks of theta-burst stimulation treatment, depression improved in all groups. Groups B and C had better antidepressant responses (as reflected by % decreases in depression score) than Groups A and D (P = 0.001, post hoc analysis: B > A, B > D, C > A, and C > D), even after controlling for age and refractoriness scores. The mean antidepressant effect was highest in Group C and followed by that in Group B. Additionally,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awu109

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, C.-T., Chen, M.-H., Juan, C.-H., Huang, H.-H., Chen, L.-F., Hsieh, J.-C., Tu, P.-C., Bai, Y.-M., Tsai, S.-J., Lee, Y.-C., & Su, T.-P.
Affiliations
Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Venue
Brain
Published
2014-05-10
Volume
137
Issue
7
Pages
2088-2098
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2108289758
Cited by
328
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
theta burst stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, intermittent theta burst stimulation, continuous theta burst stimulation, prefrontal cortex, antidepressant efficacy, placebo effect, treatment response prediction, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Theta Rhythm, Treatment Outcome, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review