The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cerebellar Inputs to Intraparietal Cortex Areas LIP and MIP: Functional Frameworks for Adaptive Control of Eye Movements, Reaching, and Arm/Eye/Head Movement Coordination
Open accessAbstract
Using retrograde transneuronal transfer of rabies virus in combination with a conventional tracer (cholera toxin B), we studied simultaneously direct (thalamocortical) and polysynaptic inputs to the ventral lateral intraparietal area (LIPv) and the medial intraparietal area (MIP) in nonhuman primates. We found that these areas receive major disynaptic inputs from specific portions of the cerebellar nuclei, the ventral dentate (D), and ventrolateral interpositus posterior (IP). Area LIPv receives inputs from oculomotor domains of the caudal D and IP. Area MIP is the target of projections from the ventral D (mainly middle third), and gaze- and arm-related domains of IP involved in reaching and arm/eye/head coordination. We also showed that cerebellar cortical "output channels" to MIP predominantly stem from posterior cerebellar areas (paramedian lobe/Crus II posterior, dorsal paraflocculus) that have the required connectivity for adaptive control of visual and proprioceptive guidance of reaching, arm/eye/head coordination, and prism adaptation. These findings provide important insight about the interplay between the posterior parietal cortex and the cerebellum regarding visuospatial adaptation mechanisms and visual and proprioceptive guidance of movement. They also have potential implications for clinical approaches to optic ataxia and neglect rehabilitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 5×
“…rostral MIP area functions as a sensorimotor interface for planning and control of proximal arm movements under visual and proprioceptive guidance (Mountcastle et al. 1975; Burbaud et al. 1991; Kalaska and Crammond 1992; Iriki et al. 1996; Johnson et al. 1996), like the parietal reach region…”
BackgroundInfluentialSPACE AND ATTENTION IN PARIETAL CORTEX
Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.319 · Cited by 1,710
Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements
Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01537-0 · Cited by 1,300 · cited 3×
“This conjunction of inputs is consistent with the role of PML/Crus IIp PC strips in visual and proprioceptive guidance of reaching, and possibly coordination of arm/eye/head movement (Stein and Glickstein 1992; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Miall et al. 2001).”
MethodResultCoding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones
lriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010 · Cited by 1,274 · cited 5×
“For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org discriminate active from passive movement (Klam and Graf 2003, 2006) and bimodal neurons with congruent visualsomatosensory receptive fields that are dynamically modified by tool use (Iriki et al. 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialMaravita, A., & Iriki, A. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008 · Cited by 1,214
An unfolded map of the cerebellar dentate nucleus and its projections to the cerebral cortex
Dum, R. P., & Strick, P. L. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00626.2002 · Cited by 684
Visual-vestibular interactive responses in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP)
Bremmer, F., Klam, F., Duhamel, J., Ben Hamed, S., & Graf, W. (2002) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02206.x · Cited by 331
Spatial maps for the control of movement.
Graziano, M. S., & Gross, C. G. (1998) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80140-2 · Cited by 323
Lynch, J. C., Hoover, J. E., & Strick, P. L. (1994) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00227293 · Cited by 306
Ben Hamed, S., Duhamel, J.-R., Bremmer, F., & Graf, W. (2001) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210100785 · Cited by 242
Self-citation
Cited by
A new neural framework for visuospatial processing
Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., & Mishkin, M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3008 · Cited by 1,325
Cerebellar networks with the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia
Bostan, A. C., Dum, R. P., & Strick, P. L. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.003 · Cited by 759
The basal ganglia communicate with the cerebellum
Bostan, A. C., Dum, R. P., & Strick, P. L. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000496107 · Cited by 780
Predictions not commands: Active inference in the motor system
Adams, R. A., Shipp, S., & Friston, K. J. (2013) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5 · Cited by 765
D'Angelo, E., & Casali, S. (2013) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2012.00116 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- Prevosto, V., Graf, W., & Ugolini, G.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-05-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 214-228
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2156370424
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cerebellar Inputs to Intraparietal Cortex Areas LIP and MIP: Functional Frameworks for Adaptive Control of Eye Movements, Reaching, and Arm/Eye/Head Movement Coordination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhp091
- The paper
- Prevosto, V., Graf, W., & Ugolini, G. (2010). Cerebellar Inputs to Intraparietal Cortex Areas LIP and MIP: Functional Frameworks for Adaptive Control of Eye Movements, Reaching, and Arm/Eye/Head Movement Coordination. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
