Cited by 684Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurological disorders and treatments

An unfolded map of the cerebellar dentate nucleus and its projections to the cerebral cortex

Dum, Richard P., Strick, Peter L.·2003·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

We have used retrograde transneuronal transport of neurotropic viruses to examine the organization of the projections from the dentate nucleus of the cerebellum to “motor” and “nonmotor” areas of the cerebral cortex. To perform this analysis we created an unfolded map of the dentate. Plotting the results from current and prior experiments on this unfolded map revealed important features about the topography of function in the dentate. We found that the projections to the primary motor and premotor areas of the cerebral cortex originated from dorsal portions of the dentate. In contrast, projections to prefrontal and posterior parietal areas of cortex originated from ventral portions of the dentate. Thus the dentate contains anatomically separate and functionally distinct motor and nonmotor domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00626.2002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hemispheric parts of the cerebellum (mainly Crus I and Crus II) are connected with various cortical association areas through DN.

    “Strick and his colleagues eventually established that the hemispheric parts of the cerebellum (mainly Crus I and Crus II) are connected with various cortical association areas through DN (Middleton and Strick, 1994; Dum and Strick, 2003; Kelly and Strick, 2003).”

    From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Dum and Strick, 2003

  • The Kalman-filter model is at least compatible with the non-motor part of the cerebro-cerebellum if the two inputs to non-motor parts of DN are proven to have different origins in future studies.

    “Overall, the Kalman-filter model is at least compatible with the non-motor part of the cerebro-cerebellum if the two inputs to non-motor parts of DN (Dum and Strick, 2003) are proven to have different origins in future studies.”

    From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Dum and Strick, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dum, R. P., & Strick, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
634-639
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2104308975
Cited by
684
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 32
FWCI
8.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH056661, MH 45156, MH-56661, P50MH045156)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-24328, R01NS024328)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
dentate nucleus, cerebellum, retrograde tracing, neurotropic viruses, primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cebus, Cerebellar Nuclei, Cerebral Cortex, Neural Pathways, Thalamus, Herpesvirus 1, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review