Cited by 197Free Will and AgencyMotor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The neural processes underlying self-agency

Open access
Nahab, F. B., Kundu, P., Gallea, C., Kakareka, J., Pursley, R., Pohida, T., Miletta, N., Friedman, J. +1 more·2011·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Self-agency (SA) is the individual's perception that an action is the consequence of his/her own intention. The neural networks underlying SA are not well understood. We carried out a novel, ecologically valid, virtual-reality experiment using blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) where SA could be modulated in real-time while subjects performed voluntary finger movements. Behavioral testing was also performed to assess the explicit judgment of SA. Twenty healthy volunteers completed the experiment. Results of the behavioral testing demonstrated paradigm validity along with the identification of a bias that led subjects to over- or underestimate the amount of control they had. The fMRI experiment identified 2 discrete networks. These leading and lagging networks likely represent a spatial and temporal flow of information, with the leading network serving the role of mismatch detection and the lagging network receiving this information and mediating its elevation to conscious awareness, giving rise to SA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhq059

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AIC is also differentially activated by changes in the sense of agency.

    “Interestingly, the AIC is also differentially activated by changes in the sense of agency”

    From An Interoceptive Predictive Coding Model of Conscious Presence (2012) · cites this paper as Nahab et al., 2011

  • The cerebellum is involved in detecting a mismatch between the expected and actual sensory feedback, leading to a feeling of disrupted agency.

    “Second, as shown in the previous section, the cerebellum is involved in detecting a mismatch between the expected and actual sensory feedback, leading to a feeling of disrupted agency (Blakemore et al., 2001; Nahab et al., 2011; Seghezzi et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nahab, F. B., Kundu, P., Gallea, C., Kakareka, J., Pursley, R., Pohida, T., Miletta, N., Friedman, J., & Hallett, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2010-04-08
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
48-55
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2161040742
Cited by
197
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
self-agency, sense of agency, voluntary action, artificial neural networks, virtual reality, mismatch detection, conscious awareness, finger movement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Volition, Personal Autonomy, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review