Cited by 2,501Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

‘Sniffin’ Sticks': Olfactory Performance Assessed by the Combined Testing of Odour Identification, Odor Discrimination and Olfactory Threshold

Hummel, T., Sekinger, B., Wolf, S.R., Pauli, E., Kobal, G.·1997·Chemical Senses

Abstract

'Sniffin' Sticks' is a new test of nasal chemosensory performance based on pen-like odor dispensing devices. It comprises three tests of olfactory function, namely tests for odor threshold (n-butanol, testing by means of a single staircase), odor discrimination (16 pairs of odorants, triple forced choice) and odor identification (16 common odorants, multiple forced choice from four verbal items per test odorant). After extensive preliminary investigations the tests were applied to a group of 104 healthy volunteers (52 female, 52 male, mean age 49.5 years, range 18-84 years) in order to establish test-retest reliability and to compare them with an established measure of olfactory performance (the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Test, CCCRC). Performance decreased with increasing age of the subjects (P < 0.001). Coefficients of correlation between sessions 1 and 2 were 0.61 for thresholds, 0.54 for discrimination and 0.73 for identification. Butanol thresholds as obtained with the CCCRC increased as a function of age; this relation to the subjects' age was not found for the CCCRC odor identification task. The test-retest reliability for CCCRC thresholds was 0.36, for odor identification it was 0.60. It is concluded that 'Sniffin' Sticks' may be suited for the routine clinical assessment of olfactory performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chemse/22.1.39

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Doty, R.L. (1991) Olfactory system. In Getchell, T.V., Doty, R.L, Bartoshuk, L.M. and Snow, J.B., Jr (eds), Smell and Taste in Health and Disease. Raven Press, New York, p. 1803.
  2. Doty, R.L and Kobal, G. (1995) Current trends in the measurement of olfactory function. In Doty, R.L. (ed.), Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 191-225.
  3. Kobal G., Hummel I, Sekinger B., Barz S., Roscher S. and Wolf S.R. (1997) 'Sniffin' Sticks': a screening test of olfactory performance. Ada Oto-Rhino-Laryngol., in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hummel, T., Sekinger, B., Wolf, S. R., Pauli, E., & Kobal, G.
Affiliations
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Hummel, T.
Venue
Chemical Senses
Published
1997
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
39-52
ISSN
  • 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3553
OpenAlex
W2159289603
Cited by
2,501
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 184 · 2023: 170 · 2022: 195 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 176 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 120 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 110 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 73
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
Sniffin' Sticks, olfactory function testing, odor identification, odor discrimination, odor threshold, n-butanol, test-retest reliability, age-related olfactory decline
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Fruit, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Odorants, Smell, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review