Cited by 242Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Effect of a Telemonitoring-Facilitated Collaboration Between General Practitioner and Heart Failure Clinic on Mortality and Rehospitalization Rates in Severe Heart Failure: The TEMA-HF 1 (Telemonitoring in the Management of Heart Failure) Study

Open access
Dendale, Paul, De Keulenaer, Gilles, Troisfontaines, Pierre, Weytjens, Caroline, Mullens, Wilfried, Elegeert, Ivan, Ector, Bavo, Houbrechts, Marita +2 more·2012·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

Aims: Chronic heart failure (CHF) patients are frequently rehospitalized within 6 months after an episode of fluid retention. Rehospitalizations are preventable, but this requires an extensive organization of the healthcare system. In this study, we tested whether intensive follow-up of patients through a telemonitoring-facilitated collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and a heart failure clinic could reduce mortality and rehospitalization rate. Methods and results: One hunderd and sixty CHF patients [mean age 76 ± 10 years, 104 males, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 35 ± 15%] were block randomized by sealed envelopes and assigned to 6 months of intense follow-up facilitated by telemonitoring (TM) or usual care (UC). The TM group measured body weight, blood pressure, and heart rate on a daily basis with electronic devices that transferred the data automatically to an online database. Email alerts were sent to the GP and heart failure clinic to intervene when pre-defined limits were exceeded. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the TM group as compared with the UC group (5% vs. 17.5%, P = 0.01). The total number of follow-up days lost to hospitalization, dialysis, or death was significantly lower in the TM group as compared with the UC group (13 vs. 30 days, P = 0.02). The number of hospitalizations for heart failure per patient showed a trend (0.24 vs. 0.42 hospitalizations/patient, P = 0.06) in favour of TM. Conclusion: Telemonitoring-facilitated collaboration between GPs and a heart failure clinic reduces mortality and number of days lost to hospitalization, death, or dialysis in CHF patients. These findings need confirmation in a large trial. Trial registation: ISRCTN39223875

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr144

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TEMA-HF1 and TIM-HF-2 trials showed that telemonitoring reduced days lost owing to heart failure hospitalizations and reduced all-cause mortality.

    “The TEMA-HF1 and TIM-HF-2 trial showed that telemonitoring reduced days lost owing to HF hospitalizations and reduced all-cause mortality66,67”
  • In the TEMA-HF1 trial, the intervention group had significantly lower all-cause mortality (absolute reduction of 12.5%) and a lower number of follow-up days lost to death, hospitalization or dialysis.

    “The intervention group had a significantly lower all-cause mortality (absolute reduction of 12.5%) and a lower number of follow-up days lost to death, hospitalization or dialysis.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dendale, P., De Keulenaer, G., Troisfontaines, P., Weytjens, C., Mullens, W., Elegeert, I., Ector, B., Houbrechts, M., Willekens, K., & Hansen, D.
Affiliations
  • Jessa Hospital (BE)
  • Middelheim Hospital , Antwerp ,
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE)
  • Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg , Genk ,
  • AZ Groeninge (BE)
  • Imelda Hospital (BE)
  • Hasselt University (BE)
Corresponding author
Dendale, Paul
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
333-340
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2054949377
Cited by
242
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Institut National d'assurance Maladie-Invalidité
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, chronic heart failure, severe heart failure, hospital readmission, mortality, general practitioners, heart failure clinic, email notifications, fluid retention
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Antihypertensive Agents, Cardiac Care Facilities, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Function, Left, Treatment Failure, Telemedicine, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review