Cited by 416Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Digital health interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Widmer, R. Jay, Collins, Nerissa M., Collins, C. Scott, West, Colin P., Lerman, Lilach O., Lerman, Amir·2015·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

Objective To assess the potential benefit of digital health interventions (DHI) on cardiovascular disease outcomes (CVD events, all-cause mortality, hospitalizations) and risk factors compared to non-DHI interventions. Patients and Methods We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, OVID, CINHAL, ERIC, PsychInfo, Cochrane, and CENTRAL from January 1, 1990 and January 21, 2014. Included studies examined any element of DHI (telemedicine, web-based strategies, email, mobile phones, mobile applications, text messaging, and monitoring sensors) and CVD outcomes or risk factors. Two reviewers independently evaluated study quality utilizing a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration risk assessment tool. Authors extracted CVD outcomes and risk factors for CVD such as weight, BMI, blood pressure, and lipids from 51 full-text articles that met validity and inclusion criteria. Results DHI significantly reduced CVD outcomes (RR=0.61, (95% CI, 0.45–0.83), P=.002; I2=22%). Concomitant reductions in weight (−3.35 lbs, (95% CI, −6.08 lbs, −1.01 lbs); P=.006; I2=96%) and BMI (−0.59 kg/m2, (95% CI, −1.15 kg/m2, −0.03 kg/m2); P=.04; I2=94%) but not blood pressure (+4.95 mmHg, (95% CI, −4.5 mmHg, 14.4 mmHg); P=.30; I2=100%) were found in these DHI trials compared to usual care. Framingham 10 year risk percentages were also significantly improved (−1.24%; 95% CI −1.73%, −0.76%; n=6; P<0.001; I2=94%). Results were limited by heterogeneity not fully explained by study population (primary or secondary prevention) or DHI modality. Conclusions Overall, these aggregations of data provide evidence that DHI can reduce CVD outcomes and have a positive impact on risk factors for CVD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.026

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two reviews found that remote monitoring and structured telephone support was superior to usual care in reducing the odds of mortality and hospitalization related to heart failure, improving survival rates, and reducing cardiovascular disease risk factors such as weight, BMI and blood pressure.

    “Two reviews found that remote monitoring, and structured telephone support was superior to usual care in reducing the odds of mortality and hospitalization related to heart failure, improve survival rates and reduce cardiovascular disease risk factors such as weight, BMI and blood pressure [20,21].”

    From Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A smartphone application from the European Society of Hypertension (ESH CARE app) has been validated and continuously updated.

    “A smartphone application from the European Society of Hypertension (ESH CARE app) has been validated and continuously updated.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Green BB Anderson ML Cook AJ A trial of web-based dietitian care for hypertension control: Weight loss effects on blood pressure Journal of Clinical Hypertension 2012 14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Widmer, R. J., Collins, N. M., Collins, C. S., West, C. P., Lerman, L. O., & Lerman, A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Lerman, Amir
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
469-480
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089506664
Cited by
416
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 7
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG31750, R01AG031750)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL92954, R01HL092954)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
digital health interventions, cardiovascular disease prevention, telemedicine, mobile health apps, weight loss, body mass index, blood pressure, serum lipids, Framingham risk score, cardiovascular risk factors, all-cause mortality, hospitalization, primary prevention, secondary prevention, online intervention, text messaging, mobile phone intervention, usual care comparison, cardiovascular events
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Primary Prevention, Telemedicine, Internet, Electronic Mail, Secondary Prevention, Text Messaging, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review