Cited by 29Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHealthcare cost, quality, practicesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Costs of unstructured investigation of unexplained syncope: insights from a micro-costing analysis of the observational PICTURE registry

Open access
Edvardsson, Nils, Wolff, Claudia, Tsintzos, Stelios, Rieger, Guido, Linker, Nicholas J.·2015·Europace

Abstract

AIMS: The observational PICTURE (Place of Reveal In the Care pathway and Treatment of patients with Unexplained Recurrent Syncope) registry enrolled 570 patients with unexplained syncope, documented their care pathway and the various tests they underwent before the insertion of an implantable loop recorder (ILR). The aims were to describe the extent and cost of diagnostic tests performed before the implant. METHODS AND RESULTS: Actual costs of 17 predefined diagnostic tests were characterized based on a combination of data from PICTURE and a micro-costing study performed at a medium-sized UK university hospital in the UK. The median cost of diagnostic tests per patient was £1114 (95% CI £995-£1233). As many patients received more than the median number of tests, the mean expenditure per patient was higher with £1613 (95% CI £1494-£1732), and for 10% of the patients the cost exceeded £3539. Tests were frequently repeated, and early use of specific and expensive tests was common. In the 12% of patients with types of tests entirely within the recommendations for an initial evaluation before ILR implant, the mean cost was £710. CONCLUSION: Important opportunities to reduce test-related costs before an ILR implant were identified, e.g. by more appropriate use of tests recommended in the initial evaluation, by decreasing repetition of tests, and by avoiding early use of specialized and expensive tests. A structured multidisciplinary approach would be the best model to achieve an optimal outcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euu412

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ILR was more cost-effective than a conventional strategy.

    “ILR was more cost-effective than a conventional strategy. 172,173,177,178”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [178]

    The Discussion (‘What is an adequate care pathway and an adequate use of diagnostic tests?’) says earlier ILR implantation has a ‘good chance’ of being cost-effective compared with unstructured conventional testing. That supports the direction of the claim, but the paper does not establish the unqualified comparison that ILR was more cost-effective; its analysis focused on costs before implantation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Moya A Sutton R Ammirati F Blanc JJ Brignole M Dahm JB Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 2631– 71. 19713422 PMC3295536
  2. [6]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Transient Loss of Consciousness (‘Blackouts’) Management in Adults and Young People. NICE Clinical Guideline 109. London: NICE, 2010 http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG109/NICEGuidance/pdf/English (29 Nov 2010, date last accessed). 31886995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edvardsson, N., Wolff, C., Tsintzos, S., Rieger, G., & Linker, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Medtronic (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Medtronic (United States) (US)
  • Medtronic (Netherlands) (NL)
  • James Cook University Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Edvardsson, Nils
Venue
Europace
Published
2015-03-10
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
1141-1148
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2035700852
Cited by
29
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
unexplained syncope, recurrent syncope, diagnostic test costs, micro-costing, implantable loop recorder, retesting, initial assessment, multidisciplinary care pathway, health care expenditure
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Costs and Cost Analysis, Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular, Electroencephalography, Female, United Kingdom, Heart Function Tests, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Syncope, Health Care Costs, Models, Economic, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review