Cited by 86Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Psychological distress in informal caregivers of patients with dementia in primary care: course and determinants

Borsje, Petra, Hems, Marleen A P, Lucassen, Peter L B J, Bor, Hans, Koopmans, Raymond T C M, Pot, Anne Margriet·2016·Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The course of psychological distress in informal caregivers of patients with dementia has been investigated in longitudinal studies with conflicting outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the course and determinants of psychological distress in informal caregivers of patients with dementia in primary care. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, data were collected at baseline, after 9 and 18 months. We assessed cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) of the patient (Mini-Mental State Examination and Neuropsychiatric Inventory) and psychological distress (Sense of Competence Questionnaire, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale and General Health Questionnaire 12-tem version) of the informal caregivers. Determinants for the course of psychological distress were caregivers' age, gender and relationship with the patient, patients' cognition and NPS, participation in a care program and admission to long-term care facilities (LTCF). With linear mixed models, the course over time for psychological distress and its determinants were explored. RESULTS: We included 117 informal caregivers, of whom 23.1% had a high risk for depression and 41.0% were identified to be likely to have mental problems at baseline. We found a stable pattern of psychological distress over time. Higher frequency of NPS, informal caregivers' age between 50 and 70 years and being female or spouse were associated with higher psychological distress. For patients who were admitted to a LTCF during the study psychological distress of the informal caregivers improved. CONCLUSIONS: GPs should focus on NPS in patients with dementia and on caregivers' psychological distress and be aware of their risk for depression and mental problems, specifically to those who are spouse, female or between 50 and 70 years of age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmw009

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior research suggests female carers spend more time caregiving and have multiple conflicting roles, resulting in greater psychological distress than male carers.

    “Prior research suggests that female carers tend to spend more time in caregiving and often have to play multiple conflicting roles 57 resulting in greater psychological distress compared to male carers 11,58,59 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vernooij-Dassen MJFJ. Dementia and home-care. PhD Thesis. University of Nijmegen Department of General Practice and Social Medicine 1993.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borsje, P., Hems, M. A. P., Lucassen, P. L. B. J., Bor, H., Koopmans, R. T. C. M., & Pot, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Centre for Family Medicine (CA)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Borsje, Petra
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2016-03-11
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
374-381
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2325332993
Cited by
86
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
psychological distress, informal caregivers, dementia, neuropsychiatric symptoms, depression, caregiver mental health, primary care, long-term care admission, spousal caregivers
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Neuropsychological Tests, Primary Health Care, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review